Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-44884 — portainer

CVE-2026-44884 is a CWE-862 vulnerability in github.com/portainer/portainer. A fix is available for github.com/portainer/portainer — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Portainer: Missing authorization on custom template file endpoint exposes template content

Also known asGHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvcGO-2026-5333
Published
May 28, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 26, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-44884.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs29th percentile — riskier than 29% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/portainer/portainer🐹github.com/portainer/portainer

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A missing authorization vulnerability in the Custom Template file endpoint (GET /api/custom_templates/{id}/file) allows any authenticated user to read the file content of any custom template by enumerating sequential integer IDs, bypassing Resource Control access restrictions. Template files may contain environment-specific values such as connection strings, API tokens, or registry credentials that administrators would not expect standard users to read.

Severity

Medium

CWE-862 — Missing Authorization

Exploitation requires an authenticated user account and at least one custom template to exist. Template files are returned verbatim and may contain embedded credentials.

Affected Versions

The vulnerability exists in every Portainer release since custom templates were introduced — the customTemplateFile handler has never performed an authorization check.

Fixes are included in the following releases:

BranchFirst vulnerableFixed in
2.33.x (LTS)2.33.02.33.8
2.39.x (LTS)2.39.02.39.1

Portainer 2.40.0 and later are not affected — the fix was already on develop when the 2.40.x STS line branched. Portainer LTS branches receive fixes for 6 months plus a 3-month overlap after the next LTS ships. All releases prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life and will not receive a fix; users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported release.

Workarounds

There is no runtime configuration that blocks the vulnerable endpoint directly. Administrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure by:

  • Avoiding storing secrets in custom templates until the patched release is deployed. Move sensitive configuration values to Portainer environment variables or an external secret store.
  • Reviewing existing custom templates for embedded secrets. Assume any secret previously stored in a custom template on an unpatched instance has been exposed to every authenticated user and rotate accordingly.

Neither replaces the fix.

Affected Code

The customTemplateFile handler in api/http/handler/customtemplates/customtemplate_file.go (lines 30-53) retrieves a custom template by its numeric ID and returns the file content without performing any authorization check.

All other custom template endpoints properly verify access:

EndpointMethodAuthorization Check
/api/custom_templates/{id}GET (inspect)userCanEditTemplate() + UserCanAccessResource()
/api/custom_templates/{id}PUT (update)userCanEditTemplate()
/api/custom_templates/{id}DELETEuserCanEditTemplate()
/api/custom_templatesGET (list)FilterAuthorizedCustomTemplates()
/api/custom_templates/{id}/fileGETNone

Vulnerable code (customtemplate_file.go:30-53):

func (handler *Handler) customTemplateFile(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) *httperror.HandlerError {
    customTemplateID, _ := request.RetrieveNumericRouteVariableValue(r, "id")
    customTemplate, _ := handler.DataStore.CustomTemplate().Read(portainer.CustomTemplateID(customTemplateID))
    // NO AUTHORIZATION CHECK
    fileContent, _ := handler.FileService.GetFileContent(customTemplate.ProjectPath, entryPath)
    return response.JSON(w, &fileResponse{FileContent: string(fileContent)})
}

Secure reference (customtemplate_inspect.go:50-75):

canEdit := userCanEditTemplate(customTemplate, securityContext)
hasAccess := authorization.UserCanAccessResource(securityContext.UserID, teamIDs, resourceControl)
if !canEdit && !hasAccess {
    return httperror.Forbidden("Access denied to resource", httperrors.ErrResourceAccessDenied)
}

Impact

Any authenticated user (including the lowest-privilege standard user) can read the file content of every custom template in the instance. Custom templates commonly contain Docker Compose configuration, which may include environment-specific secrets such as database connection strings, API tokens, or registry credentials.

Timeline

  • 2026-02-11: Reported via GitHub Security Advisory by duddnr0615k.
  • 2026-03-04: Fix merged to develop and cherry-picked to release/2.39.
  • 2026-03-19: 2.39.1 released with fix.
  • 2026-03-25: 2.40.0 released with fix already present from branch cut.
  • 2026-05-07: 2.33.8 released.

Credit

  • duddnr0615k — identified and reported the missing authorization check on the custom template file endpoint.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/portainer/portainer≥ 2.33.0&&< 2.33.82.33.8go get github.com/portainer/portainer@v2.33.8
🐹Gogithub.com/portainer/portainer≥ 2.39.0&&< 2.39.12.39.1go get github.com/portainer/portainer@v2.39.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/portainer/portainer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/portainer/portainer to 2.33.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-44884 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-44884 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-44884. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary A missing authorization vulnerability in the Custom Template file endpoint (`GET /api/custom_templates/{id}/file`) allows any authenticated user to read the file content of any custom template by enumerating sequential integer IDs, bypassing Resource Control access restrictions. Template files may contain environment-specific values such as connection strings, API tokens, or registry credentials that administrators would not expect standard users to read. ## Severity **Medium** **CWE-862** — Missing Authorization Exploitation requires an authenticated user account and at least o
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-44884 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-44884 across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.