GHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc — portainer
MEDIUMGHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-862 vulnerability in github.com/portainer/portainer. A fix is available for github.com/portainer/portainer — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Portainer missing authorization on custom template file endpoint, which exposes template content
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/portainer/portainer🐹github.com/portainer/portainerReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A missing authorization vulnerability in the Custom Template file endpoint (GET /api/custom_templates/{id}/file) allows any authenticated user to read the file content of any custom template by enumerating sequential integer IDs, bypassing Resource Control access restrictions. Template files may contain environment-specific values such as connection strings, API tokens, or registry credentials that administrators would not expect standard users to read.
Severity
Medium
CWE-862 — Missing Authorization
Exploitation requires an authenticated user account and at least one custom template to exist. Template files are returned verbatim and may contain embedded credentials.
Affected Versions
The vulnerability exists in every Portainer release since custom templates were introduced — the customTemplateFile handler has never performed an authorization check.
Fixes are included in the following releases:
| Branch | First vulnerable | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
| 2.33.x (LTS) | 2.33.0 | 2.33.8 |
| 2.39.x (LTS) | 2.39.0 | 2.39.1 |
Portainer 2.40.0 and later are not affected — the fix was already on develop when the 2.40.x STS line branched. Portainer LTS branches receive fixes for 6 months plus a 3-month overlap after the next LTS ships. All releases prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life and will not receive a fix; users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported release.
Workarounds
There is no runtime configuration that blocks the vulnerable endpoint directly. Administrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure by:
- Avoiding storing secrets in custom templates until the patched release is deployed. Move sensitive configuration values to Portainer environment variables or an external secret store.
- Reviewing existing custom templates for embedded secrets. Assume any secret previously stored in a custom template on an unpatched instance has been exposed to every authenticated user and rotate accordingly.
Neither replaces the fix.
Affected Code
The customTemplateFile handler in api/http/handler/customtemplates/customtemplate_file.go (lines 30-53) retrieves a custom template by its numeric ID and returns the file content without performing any authorization check.
All other custom template endpoints properly verify access:
| Endpoint | Method | Authorization Check |
|---|---|---|
/api/custom_templates/{id} | GET (inspect) | userCanEditTemplate() + UserCanAccessResource() |
/api/custom_templates/{id} | PUT (update) | userCanEditTemplate() |
/api/custom_templates/{id} | DELETE | userCanEditTemplate() |
/api/custom_templates | GET (list) | FilterAuthorizedCustomTemplates() |
/api/custom_templates/{id}/file | GET | None |
Vulnerable code (customtemplate_file.go:30-53):
func (handler *Handler) customTemplateFile(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) *httperror.HandlerError {
customTemplateID, _ := request.RetrieveNumericRouteVariableValue(r, "id")
customTemplate, _ := handler.DataStore.CustomTemplate().Read(portainer.CustomTemplateID(customTemplateID))
// NO AUTHORIZATION CHECK
fileContent, _ := handler.FileService.GetFileContent(customTemplate.ProjectPath, entryPath)
return response.JSON(w, &fileResponse{FileContent: string(fileContent)})
}
Secure reference (customtemplate_inspect.go:50-75):
canEdit := userCanEditTemplate(customTemplate, securityContext)
hasAccess := authorization.UserCanAccessResource(securityContext.UserID, teamIDs, resourceControl)
if !canEdit && !hasAccess {
return httperror.Forbidden("Access denied to resource", httperrors.ErrResourceAccessDenied)
}
Impact
Any authenticated user (including the lowest-privilege standard user) can read the file content of every custom template in the instance. Custom templates commonly contain Docker Compose configuration, which may include environment-specific secrets such as database connection strings, API tokens, or registry credentials.
Timeline
- 2026-02-11: Reported via GitHub Security Advisory by duddnr0615k.
- 2026-03-04: Fix merged to
developand cherry-picked torelease/2.39. - 2026-03-19: 2.39.1 released with fix.
- 2026-03-25: 2.40.0 released with fix already present from branch cut.
- 2026-05-07: 2.33.8 released.
Credit
- duddnr0615k — identified and reported the missing authorization check on the custom template file endpoint.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/portainer/portainer | ≥ 2.33.0&&< 2.33.8 | 2.33.8go get github.com/portainer/portainer@v2.33.8 |
| 🐹Go | github.com/portainer/portainer | ≥ 2.39.0&&< 2.39.1 | 2.39.1go get github.com/portainer/portainer@v2.39.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/portainer/portainer, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/portainer/portainer to 2.33.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-cqpq-2fgr-8mvc across Go dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.