Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6

MEDIUM

GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.6) Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in github.com/projectcapsule/capsule. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Capsule has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-22872: TenantResource RawItems and Generators still allow cluster-scoped resource creation (cross-tenant privilege escalation)

Also known asCVE-2026-65835GO-2026-6157
Published
Jul 31, 2026
Updated
Aug 18, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 14, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs9th percentile — riskier than 9% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.23%0.46%0.69%0.2%0.2%0.2%Aug 26Sep 26Sep 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 372,613 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/projectcapsule/capsule

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

CVE-2026-22872 (GHSA-qjjm-7j9w-pw72) reported that a Tenant Owner could create cluster-scoped resources (e.g. ClusterRole, ValidatingWebhookConfiguration) through a TenantResource, because the controller applies them with its cluster-admin ServiceAccount and SetNamespace is ineffective for cluster-scoped kinds. The v0.13.0 fix added a cluster-scope rejection guard, but only on the NamespacedItems selection path (ResourceReference.LoadResources -> IsNamespacedGVK, error "cluster-scoped kind ... is not allowed"). The RawItems create path — the exact vector the original advisory named — and the Generators path were not given this guard. The vulnerability therefore persists in all releases v0.13.0 through v0.13.7 and on trunk HEAD (8d89d6865d).

Details

TenantResource reconcile flow:

  • internal/controllers/resources/namespaced.go reconcile() obtains the apply client via loadClient(); by default (impersonation off, no Spec.ServiceAccount) this is the manager client whose SA is bound to cluster-admin (charts/capsule/templates/rbac.yaml:488-501, {fullname}-manager-rolebinding -> roleRef cluster-admin).
  • Collector.Collect() (collect.go) processes spec.RawItems via handleRawItem and spec.Generators via handleGeneratorItem.

handleRawItem (collect.go:406-425, trunk HEAD — byte-identical to v0.13.0):

tmplString := tpl.FastTemplate(string(item.Raw), opts.Iterator.FastContext)
obj := &unstructured.Unstructured{}
unstructured.UnstructuredJSONScheme.Decode([]byte(tmplString), nil, obj)
if ns != nil { obj.SetNamespace(ns.Name) }   // ONLY mitigation
return obj, nil                                // NO IsNamespacedGVK / allowClusterScoped guard

handleGeneratorItem (collect.go:382-404) is the same: it only SetNamespaces on rendered objects.

The accumulated objects flow to pkg/api/processor/processor_func.go Reconcile() -> Apply() -> clt.PatchApply(ctx, c, obj, ...) (line 167/378) with no scope check at any point.

By contrast, CollectNamespacedItems (collect.go:308) calls item.LoadResources(..., allowClusterScoped=false), and pkg/template/reference.go:105-107 enforces:

if !allowClusterScoped && !isNamespaced {
    return nil, fmt.Errorf("cluster-scoped kind %s/%s is not allowed", ...)
}

So the guard the fix added is real, but it sits on a different (selection) path than the one the CVE described (RawItems create path). For cluster-scoped kinds, SetNamespace is ignored by the Kubernetes API server, so the object is created cluster-wide by the cluster-admin client.

Parent-fix diff confirmation: in v0.12.4 the RawItems handler in processor.go was the vulnerable code (obj.SetNamespace(ns.Name) then createOrUpdate via r.client). v0.13.0 refactored this into collect.go handleRawItem but left it without the new guard.

Proof of Concept

A self-contained in-process Go test (incompletefix_poc_test.go), run against trunk HEAD with go1.26.4, proves the asymmetry:

  • TestRawItemPath_NoClusterScopeGuard: feeds a ClusterRole rawItem to handleRawItem -> object returned unchanged, no rejection (PASS).
  • TestNamespacedItemsPath_HasClusterScopeGuard: feeds the same ClusterRole kind to LoadResources(allowClusterScoped=false) -> rejected with "cluster-scoped kind rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole is not allowed" (PASS).
VULNERABLE: RawItems path accepted cluster-scoped rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole;
            metadata.namespace="tenant-ns" (ignored by API server for cluster-scoped kinds)
GUARDED:    NamespacedItems path correctly rejected cluster-scoped kind:
            cluster-scoped kind rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole is not allowed

End-to-end (cluster) reproduction:

  1. Deploy capsule (default Helm) with rbac.resources.create=true (the opt-in that exposes TenantResources to tenant owners; the configuration the original CVE applies to).
  2. As a Tenant Owner, create in a tenant namespace:
    apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2
    kind: TenantResource
    metadata: {name: pwn, namespace: <tenant-ns>}
    spec:
      resources:
        - namespaceSelector: {matchLabels: {capsule.clastix.io/tenant: <tenant>}}
          rawItems:
            - apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
              kind: ClusterRole
              metadata: {name: tenant-escalation}
              rules: [{apiGroups: ["*"], resources: ["*"], verbs: ["*"]}]
    
  3. Observe the cluster-scoped ClusterRole tenant-escalation is created by the cluster-admin controller, despite the tenant owner lacking cluster RBAC to create it. Swap in ValidatingWebhookConfiguration to intercept/exfiltrate cluster-wide Secrets.

Impact

A Tenant Owner (namespace-scoped) escalates to cluster-admin-equivalent privileges and can compromise all tenants and the cluster control plane. Identical impact to CVE-2026-22872; the v0.13.0 remediation does not close the RawItems/Generators vector.

Remediation

Apply the same IsNamespacedGVK / allowClusterScoped rejection inside handleRawItem and handleGeneratorItem — or centrally in Collector.AddToAccumulation / processor.Apply — so the create path enforces the same cluster-scope policy as the selection path. (GlobalTenantResource shares the path but is not a privesc — cluster-admin-only to create.)

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/projectcapsule/capsule0.13.0&&< 0.13.80.13.8

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/projectcapsule/capsule. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/projectcapsule/capsule to 0.13.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary CVE-2026-22872 (GHSA-qjjm-7j9w-pw72) reported that a Tenant Owner could create cluster-scoped resources (e.g. `ClusterRole`, `ValidatingWebhookConfiguration`) through a `TenantResource`, because the controller applies them with its cluster-admin ServiceAccount and `SetNamespace` is ineffective for cluster-scoped kinds. The v0.13.0 fix added a cluster-scope rejection guard, but **only on the NamespacedItems selection path** (`ResourceReference.LoadResources` -> `IsNamespacedGVK`, error `"cluster-scoped kind ... is not allowed"`). The **RawItems create path — the exact vector the ori
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6: capsule (Medium 6.6) | O3 Security