Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w ghost

MEDIUMFix: TryGhost/Ghost#29628

GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.8) Information Exposure vulnerability in ghost. A fix is available for ghost — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Ghost: Blind Password Hash Disclosure in Ghost Admin API

Also known asBIT-ghost-2026-70590CVE-2026-70590
Published
Aug 4, 2026
Updated
Aug 17, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs9th percentile — riskier than 9% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 376,715 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

7other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
ghostnpm
13Kdownloads / week

Description

Impact

Any staff-level user was able to leak the hashed passwords of other staff users. An offline password-guessing attack against the hashes could lead to account takeover if successful, but Device Verification should have prevented an attacker from logging in with a recovered password. Depending on the database used, leaked hashes may not have had the correct casing for all characters, increasing the difficulty of a password-guessing attack.

Vulnerable versions

This vulnerability is present in Ghost versions v6.54.0 and earlier.

Patches

v6.54.1 contains a fix for this issue.

How to update

For self-hosters using Docker, find Docker's official Ghost image here. Updating a Docker-based Ghost instance is documented here.

If your Ghost is a Ghost-CLI install see our documentation on updating it to the latest version here.

Workarounds

If upgrading immediately is not possible, ensure all staff users have Multi-factor Authentication (MFA) enabled. This will help prevent an attacker from logging in with any passwords that are successfully recovered from the leaked hashes.

References

Ghost thanks Chapman Schleiss for disclosing this vulnerability responsibly.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, email us at [email protected].

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmghostall versions6.54.1npm install ghost@6.54.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ghost, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ghost to 6.54.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Any staff-level user was able to leak the hashed passwords of other staff users. An offline password-guessing attack against the hashes could lead to account takeover if successful, but [Device Verification](https://docs.ghost.org/security#device-verification) should have prevented an attacker from logging in with a recovered password. Depending on the database used, leaked hashes may not have had the correct casing for all characters, increasing the difficulty of a password-guessing attack. ### Vulnerable versions This vulnerability is present in Ghost versions v6.54.0 and earli
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-jm22-3w23-5q7w: ghost (Medium 4.8) | O3 Security