GHSA-jjgj-cx3q-pw4w
HIGHGHSA-jjgj-cx3q-pw4w is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-jjgj-cx3q-pw4w is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
OpenMRS ModuleResourcesServlet has Path Traversal that Leads to Arbitrary File Read
Real-World Exposure
org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web☕org.openmrs.web:openmrs-webReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Affected Versions
version ≤ 2.7.8 (latest version at time of disclosure)
https://github.com/openmrs/openmrs-core
Impact
The /openmrs/moduleResources/{moduleid} endpoint in OpenMRS Core is vulnerable to a path traversal attack. The ModuleResourcesServlet does not properly validate user-supplied path input, allowing an attacker to traverse directories and read arbitrary files from the server filesystem (e.g., /etc/passwd, application configuration files containing database credentials).
This endpoint serves static module resources (CSS, JS, images) and is not protected by authentication filters, as these resources are required for rendering the login page. Therefore, this vulnerability can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker.
Note: Successful exploitation requires the target deployment to run on Apache Tomcat < 8.5.31, where the
..;path parameter bypass is not mitigated by the container. Deployments on Tomcat ≥ 8.5.31 / ≥ 9.0.10 are protected at the container level, though the underlying code defect remains.
Steps to Reproduce
- Identify a valid installed module ID on the target OpenMRS instance (e.g.,
legacyui). - Send the following HTTP request:
- The server responds with HTTP 200 and the contents of
/etc/passwd:
Root Cause Analysis
The vulnerability exists in ModuleResourcesServlet.java (web/src/main/java/org/openmrs/module/web/ModuleResourcesServlet.java).
The getFile() method constructs a filesystem path from user-controlled input without performing path boundary validation:
protected File getFile(HttpServletRequest request) {
// Step 1: User-controlled path input
String path = request.getPathInfo();
// Step 2: Extract module from path prefix
Module module = ModuleUtil.getModuleForPath(path);
if (module == null) { return null; }
// Step 3: Strip module ID prefix — no traversal check
String relativePath = ModuleUtil.getPathForResource(module, path);
// Step 4: Concatenate into absolute path
String realPath = getServletContext().getRealPath("")
+ MODULE_PATH
+ module.getModuleIdAsPath()
+ "/resources"
+ relativePath; // contains "/../../../etc/passwd"
realPath = realPath.replace("/", File.separator);
// Step 5: No normalize().startsWith() boundary check
File f = new File(realPath);
if (!f.exists()) { return null; }
return f; // Arbitrary file returned to client
}
The helper method ModuleUtil.getPathForResource() only strips the module ID prefix and performs no sanitization:
public static String getPathForResource(Module module, String path) {
if (path.startsWith("/")) {
path = path.substring(1);
}
return path.substring(module.getModuleIdAsPath().length());
// Returns unsanitized remainder, e.g., "/../../../../../../etc/passwd"
}
The resulting path resolves as:
{webapp}/WEB-INF/view/module/legacyui/resources/../../../../../../etc/passwd
→ /etc/passwd
Notably, the same codebase already implements correct path traversal protection in StartupFilter.java:
// StartupFilter.java — correct protection
fullFilePath = fullFilePath.resolve(httpRequest.getPathInfo());
if (!(fullFilePath.normalize().startsWith(filePath))) {
log.warn("Detected attempted directory traversal...");
return; // Request rejected
}
This check is absent from ModuleResourcesServlet.
Remediation
Add a path boundary check after constructing realPath and before returning the File object. The fix should use normalize() + startsWith() to ensure the resolved path stays within the allowed module resources directory:
File f = new File(realPath);
Path allowedBase = Paths.get(getServletContext().getRealPath(""), "WEB-INF", "view", "module");
if (!f.toPath().normalize().startsWith(allowedBase.normalize())) {
log.warn("Blocked path traversal attempt: {}", request.getPathInfo());
return null;
}
This is consistent with the existing pattern used in StartupFilter.java and TestInstallUtil.java within the same project.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web | all versions | No fix |
| ☕Maven | org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web | ≥ 2.8.0&&< 2.8.6 | 2.8.6 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
No patched version of org.openmrs.web:openmrs-web has shipped for GHSA-jjgj-cx3q-pw4w yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jjgj-cx3q-pw4w is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-jjgj-cx3q-pw4w. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-jjgj-cx3q-pw4w in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-jjgj-cx3q-pw4w across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.