GHSA-jfp7-4j67-8r3q is a low-severity (CVSS 2.5) CWE-131 vulnerability in tensorflow. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-jfp7-4j67-8r3q is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Heap buffer overflow caused by rounding
Real-World Exposure
tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu+4 moreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
An attacker can trigger a heap buffer overflow in tf.raw_ops.QuantizedResizeBilinear by manipulating input values so that float rounding results in off-by-one error in accessing image elements:
import tensorflow as tf
l = [256, 328, 361, 17, 361, 361, 361, 361, 361, 361, 361, 361, 361, 361, 384]
images = tf.constant(l, shape=[1, 1, 15, 1], dtype=tf.qint32)
size = tf.constant([12, 6], shape=[2], dtype=tf.int32)
min = tf.constant(80.22522735595703)
max = tf.constant(80.39215850830078)
tf.raw_ops.QuantizedResizeBilinear(images=images, size=size, min=min, max=max,
align_corners=True, half_pixel_centers=True)
This is because the implementation computes two integers (representing the upper and lower bounds for interpolation) by ceiling and flooring a floating point value:
const float in_f = std::floor(in);
interpolation->lower[i] = std::max(static_cast<int64>(in_f), static_cast<int64>(0));
interpolation->upper[i] = std::min(static_cast<int64>(std::ceil(in)), in_size - 1);
For some values of in, interpolation->upper[i] might be smaller than interpolation->lower[i]. This is an issue if interpolation->upper[i] is capped at in_size-1 as it means that interpolation->lower[i] points outside of the image. Then, in the interpolation code, this would result in heap buffer overflow:
template <int RESOLUTION, typename T, typename T_SCALE, typename T_CALC>
inline void OutputLerpForChannels(const InterpolationCache<T_SCALE>& xs,
const int64 x, const T_SCALE ys_ilerp,
const int channels, const float min,
const float max, const T* ys_input_lower_ptr,
const T* ys_input_upper_ptr,
T* output_y_ptr) {
const int64 xs_lower = xs.lower[x];
...
for (int c = 0; c < channels; ++c) {
const T top_left = ys_input_lower_ptr[xs_lower + c];
...
}
}
For the other cases where interpolation->upper[i] is smaller than interpolation->lower[i], we can set them to be equal without affecting the output.
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit f851613f8f0fb0c838d160ced13c134f778e3ce7.
The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by Ying Wang and Yakun Zhang of Baidu X-Team.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | all versions | 2.1.4 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.2.0&&< 2.2.3 | 2.2.3 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.3.0&&< 2.3.3 | 2.3.3 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.4.0&&< 2.4.2 | 2.4.2 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | all versions | 2.1.4 |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | ≥ 2.2.0&&< 2.2.3 | 2.2.3 |
Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update tensorflow to 2.1.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-jfp7-4j67-8r3q is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-jfp7-4j67-8r3q is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-jfp7-4j67-8r3q. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-jfp7-4j67-8r3q in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-jfp7-4j67-8r3q across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.