Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist

GHSA-j72f-h752-mx4w

MEDIUM

Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log

Also known asCVE-2023-48708
Published
Nov 23, 2023
Updated
Feb 16, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk45th percentile+0.47%
0.00%0.38%0.75%1.13%0.2%0.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐘codeigniter4/shield

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

If successful login attempts are recorded, the raw tokens are stored in the log table. If a malicious person somehow views the data in the log table, he or she can obtain a raw token, which can then be used to send a request with that user's authority.

When you (1) use the following authentiactors,

and you (2) log successful login attempts, the raw tokens are stored.

Patches

Upgrade to Shield v1.0.0-beta.8 or later.

Workarounds

Disable logging for successful login attempts by the configuration files.

  • AccessTokens or HmacSha256
    • Set Config\AuthToken::$recordLoginAttempt to Auth::RECORD_LOGIN_ATTEMPT_FAILURE or Auth::RECORD_LOGIN_ATTEMPT_NONE
  • JWT
    • Set Config\AuthJWT::$recordLoginAttempt to Auth::RECORD_LOGIN_ATTEMPT_FAILURE or Auth::RECORD_LOGIN_ATTEMPT_NONE

References

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistcodeigniter4/shieldall versions1.0.0-beta.8

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for codeigniter4/shield. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update codeigniter4/shield to 1.0.0-beta.8 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-j72f-h752-mx4w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-j72f-h752-mx4w is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-j72f-h752-mx4w. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact If successful login attempts are recorded, the raw tokens are stored in the log table. If a malicious person somehow views the data in the log table, he or she can obtain a raw token, which can then be used to send a request with that user's authority. When you (1) **use the following authentiactors**, - [AccessTokens](https://codeigniter4.github.io/shield/references/authentication/tokens/) (`tokens`) - [JWT](https://codeigniter4.github.io/shield/addons/jwt/) (`jwt`) - [HmacSha256](https://codeigniter4.github.io/shield/references/authentication/hmac/) (`hmac`) and you (2) **log su
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-j72f-h752-mx4w in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-j72f-h752-mx4w across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.