Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83 — ray

HIGH

GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Path Traversal vulnerability in ray. A fix is available for ray — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Ray Dashboard is vulnerable to path traversal through its static file handling mechanism

Also known asCVE-2026-32981PYSEC-2026-130
Published
Mar 17, 2026
Updated
Jun 9, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 24, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.0%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs62th percentile — riskier than 62% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,145 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍ray

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

A path traversal vulnerability was identified in Ray Dashboard (default port 8265) in Ray versions prior to 2.8.1. Due to improper validation and sanitization of user-supplied paths in the static file handling mechanism, an attacker can use traversal sequences (e.g., ../) to access files outside the intended static directory, resulting in local file disclosure.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIrayall versions2.8.1pip install --upgrade 'ray==2.8.1'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ray, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ray to 2.8.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1774351144RHSA-2026:5809
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:1774547384RHSA-2026:6761
Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.2rhaiis/vllm-rocm-rhel9:1775252598RHSA-2026:6762
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:1780078312RHSA-2026:24977
Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25rhoai/odh-vllm-cuda-rhel9:1783998774RHSA-2026:42644
Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:1778677779RHSA-2026:19712

Frequently Asked Questions

A path traversal vulnerability was identified in Ray Dashboard (default port 8265) in Ray versions prior to 2.8.1. Due to improper validation and sanitization of user-supplied paths in the static file handling mechanism, an attacker can use traversal sequences (e.g., ../) to access files outside the intended static directory, resulting in local file disclosure.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-j3mh-qmjj-xp83: ray (High 7.5) | O3 Security