Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6

HIGH

GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-345 vulnerability in fast-jwt. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

fast-jwt accepts unknown `crit` header extensions (RFC 7515 violation)

Also known asCVE-2026-35042
Published
Apr 3, 2026
Updated
Apr 6, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Apr 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

87other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
fast-jwtnpm
1.2Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

fast-jwt does not validate the crit (Critical) Header Parameter defined in RFC 7515 §4.1.11. When a JWS token contains a crit array listing extensions that fast-jwt does not understand, the library accepts the token instead of rejecting it. This violates the MUST requirement in the RFC.


RFC Requirement

RFC 7515 §4.1.11:

If any of the listed extension Header Parameters are not understood and supported by the recipient, then the JWS is invalid.


Proof of Concept

const { createSigner, createVerifier } = require("fast-jwt"); // v3.3.3

const signer = createSigner({ key: "secret", algorithm: "HS256" });
const token = signer({
  sub: "attacker",
  role: "admin",
  header: { crit: ["x-custom-policy"], "x-custom-policy": "require-mfa" },
});

// Should REJECT — x-custom-policy is not understood
const verifier = createVerifier({ key: "secret", algorithms: ["HS256"] });
try {
  const result = verifier(token);
  console.log("ACCEPTED:", result);
  // Output: ACCEPTED: { sub: 'attacker', role: 'admin' }
} catch (e) {
  console.log("REJECTED:", e.message);
}

Expected: Error — unsupported critical extension Actual: Token accepted.

Comparison

// jose (panva) v4+ — correctly rejects
const jose = require("jose");
await jose.jwtVerify(token, new TextEncoder().encode("secret"));
// throws: Extension Header Parameter "x-custom-policy" is not recognized

Impact

  • Split-brain verification in mixed-library environments
  • Security policy bypass when crit carries enforcement semantics
  • Token binding bypass (RFC 7800 cnf confirmation)
  • See CVE-2025-59420 for full impact analysis

Suggested Fix

In src/verifier.js, add crit validation after header decoding:

const SUPPORTED_CRIT = new Set(["b64"]);

function validateCrit(header) {
  if (!header.crit) return;
  if (!Array.isArray(header.crit) || header.crit.length === 0)
    throw new Error("crit must be a non-empty array");
  for (const ext of header.crit) {
    if (!SUPPORTED_CRIT.has(ext))
      throw new Error(`Unsupported critical extension: ${ext}`);
    if (!(ext in header))
      throw new Error(`Critical extension ${ext} not present in header`);
  }
}

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmfast-jwtall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fast-jwt. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of fast-jwt has shipped for GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `fast-jwt` does not validate the `crit` (Critical) Header Parameter defined in RFC 7515 §4.1.11. When a JWS token contains a `crit` array listing extensions that `fast-jwt` does not understand, the library accepts the token instead of rejecting it. This violates the **MUST** requirement in the RFC. --- ## RFC Requirement RFC 7515 §4.1.11: > If any of the listed extension Header Parameters are **not understood > and supported** by the recipient, then the **JWS is invalid**. --- ## Proof of Concept ```javascript const { createSigner, createVerifier } = require("fast-jwt"); //
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-hm7r-c7qw-ghp6 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.