How severe is GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg?

No CVSS score has been assigned to GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg yet. Review the advisory details and affected package list to assess your exposure.

Which packages are affected by GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg?

GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg affects the following packages: nocodb (npm). Ecosystems affected: npm.

How do I fix GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg?

Update nocodb to 2026.05.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

How do I detect GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg in my npm dependencies?

Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nocodb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

How do I mitigate GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg if there is no patch (or I can't update yet)?

Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Is GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg actively exploited in the wild?

No public exploit code has been indexed for GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg yet. This does not mean the vulnerability cannot be exploited — absence of public exploits does not imply safety. Apply the recommended fix and use O3 Security to monitor your exposure.

What is the EPSS score for GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg?

GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg has an EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) score of 0.4%, placing it in the 31th percentile of all CVEs. EPSS is maintained by FIRST.org and estimates the probability that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild within the next 30 days. This score indicates relatively lower exploitation probability, though the CVSS severity should still guide your patching priority.

What type of vulnerability is GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg?

GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg is classified as Cross-site Scripting (XSS) (CWE-79). This weakness type describe the underlying flaw category, which helps determine the potential impact and the right class of mitigation. This is a high-impact weakness class that often enables remote code execution or data exposure.

When was GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg published, and has it been updated?

GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg was published on June 5, 2026 and was last updated on July 20, 2026. Advisory data evolves as severity scores, affected ranges, and exploit intelligence are revised — always check the latest version of the advisory before acting.

📦 npm

Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg — nocodb

GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg is a Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in nocodb. A fix is available for nocodb — see the affected versions and patch details below.

NocoDB: Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Form View Redirect URL

Also known asCVE-2026-47387

Published

Jun 5, 2026

Updated

Jul 20, 2026

Affected

1 pkg

Patched

1 / 1

Exploits

None indexed

Exploitation data as of Sep 27, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗

0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days

Lower Risk0.00%

Lower risk than most CVEs31th percentile — riskier than 31% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

0other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream

nocodbnpm

2Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The shared form-view submit handler in NocoDB writes the form's redirect_url to window.location.href after a same-host check that does not validate the URL scheme. A user with editor role (or above) on any base can plant a javascript: URL in the form's redirect_url; when an authenticated viewer opens the share-link and submits the form, the payload executes in the NocoDB origin and can read the session token from localStorage["nocodb-gui-v2"].

Details

The vulnerable sink is in packages/nc-gui/composables/useSharedFormViewStore.ts:

isValidRedirectUrl validated only typeof === 'string' and non-empty trim — no scheme check.
The submit branch built an anchor element, compared anchor.host to window.location.host, and either pushState-reloaded (same host) or assigned window.location.href = redirectUrl (otherwise).
For non-network schemes such as javascript:, data:, vbscript:, and file:, anchor.host is the empty string, so the same-host check is false and the code falls into the external-redirect branch — executing the URL same-origin in the NocoDB tab.

The redirect_url field is writable by any user with editor role on the base via the form-view PATCH endpoint, and the value is returned verbatim by the public shared-view meta endpoint, so no further privilege is required to weaponize a public form share.

Impact

Same-origin script execution in the viewer's NocoDB tab. The payload runs in the NocoDB origin and can read the session token at localStorage["nocodb-gui-v2"].token.
Action under the viewer's identity. With the token, an attacker can call authenticated APIs as the viewer, scoped to whatever workspaces, bases, and operations that viewer is permitted to use.
Single-click viewer flow. Form share-links are the intended distribution channel for forms, so the phishing surface is on-brand; the form can be configured with a single hidden pre-filled required field to reduce the viewer flow to one click.

Credit

This issue was reported by @kah-ja (turingpoint.de).

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed

Ecosystem	Package	Vulnerable range	Fix
📦npm	`nocodb`	all versions	2026.05.1`npm install nocodb@2026.05.1`

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency

Detect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nocodb, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update nocodb to 2026.05.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The shared form-view submit handler in NocoDB writes the form's `redirect_url` to `window.location.href` after a same-host check that does not validate the URL scheme. A user with `editor` role (or above) on any base can plant a `javascript:` URL in the form's `redirect_url`; when an authenticated viewer opens the share-link and submits the form, the payload executes in the NocoDB origin and can read the session token from `localStorage["nocodb-gui-v2"]`. ### Details The vulnerable sink is in `packages/nc-gui/composables/useSharedFormViewStore.ts`: - `isValidRedirectUrl` valida

O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-hj85-ph9q-78jg in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

Scan my dependencies How O3 SCA works