Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf — axios

HIGH

GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in axios. A fix is available for axios — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Axios: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via Cookie Name Injection

Also known asCVE-2026-44496
Published
Jun 4, 2026
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 26, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.0%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs60th percentile — riskier than 60% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

180Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
axiosnpm
133.9Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

Axios versions before 0.32.0 on the 0.x line and before 1.16.0 on the 1.x line build a regular expression from the configured XSRF cookie name without escaping regex metacharacters. In standard browser environments, an attacker who can influence the cookie name passed to axios can cause expensive regex backtracking while axios reads document.cookie.

The practical impact is client-side availability degradation, such as freezing the affected browser tab while axios prepares a request. The issue does not affect ordinary Node.js HTTP adapter usage, React Native, or web workers, where axios does not read document.cookie.

Impact

Applications are affected only when attacker-controlled data can reach the XSRF cookie name configuration or a direct/unsafe call to the internal cookie helper.

This does not expose credentials, modify requests, or affect response integrity. The impact is availability only.

Affected Functionality

Affected code paths:

  • lib/helpers/cookies.js read(name) in standard browser environments.
  • lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js in 1.x, when browser XHR/fetch adapters resolve XSRF config.
  • lib/adapters/xhr.js in 0.x, when the XHR adapter reads the configured XSRF cookie.
  • Direct use of axios/unsafe/helpers/cookies.js in 1.x, if callers pass attacker-controlled names.

Unaffected code paths:

  • Default static xsrfCookieName: 'XSRF-TOKEN' when not attacker-controlled.
  • Requests with xsrfCookieName: null.
  • Node HTTP adapter usage without browser document.cookie.
  • React Native and web workers where axios does not use standard browser cookie access.

Technical Details

Affected versions interpolate the cookie name into a regex.

const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));

Because name is not escaped, regex metacharacters in the cookie name are interpreted as regex syntax. A payload such as (.+)+$ can force catastrophic backtracking against document.cookie.

The fix avoids dynamic regex construction and parses document.cookie by splitting on ;, trimming leading whitespace, and comparing cookie names with exact string equality.

Proof of Concept of Attack

function vulnerableRead(name, cookie) {
  const start = Date.now();

  try {
    cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
  } catch {}

  return Date.now() - start;
}

for (const n of [20, 22, 24, 26, 28]) {
  const cookie = 'x='.padEnd(n, 'a') + '!';
  console.log(`${n}: ${vulnerableRead('(.+)+$', cookie)}ms`);
}

Expected result: timings grow rapidly as the cookie string length increases.

Workarounds

Set xsrfCookieName: null if the application does not need axios to read an XSRF cookie.

Do not derive xsrfCookieName from untrusted input. If a dynamic cookie name is unavoidable, validate it against a strict cookie-name allowlist before passing it to axios.

Avoid calling axios/unsafe/helpers/cookies.js directly with untrusted names

<details> <summary>Original Source</summary>

Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via Cookie Name Injection

1. Title

ReDoS via Unsanitized Cookie Name in Dynamic Regular Expression Construction

2. Affected Software and Version

  • Software: Axios
  • Version: 1.15.0 (and potentially earlier versions)
  • Component: lib/helpers/cookies.js
  • Ecosystem: npm (Node.js / Browser)

3. Vulnerability Type / CWE

  • Type: Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
  • CWE-1333: Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
  • CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

4. CVSS 3.1 Score

Score: 7.5 (High)

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

MetricValue
Attack VectorNetwork
Attack ComplexityLow
Privileges RequiredNone
User InteractionNone
ScopeUnchanged
ConfidentialityNone
IntegrityNone
AvailabilityHigh

5. Description

The cookies.read() function in lib/helpers/cookies.js constructs a regular expression dynamically using the name parameter without any sanitization or escaping of special regex characters. At line 33, the code passes the raw name value directly into new RegExp():

const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));

An attacker who can control or influence the cookie name parameter (e.g., via XSRF cookie name configuration, prototype pollution of xsrfCookieName, or any code path where user input reaches cookies.read()) can inject a malicious regex pattern that causes catastrophic backtracking, leading to a Denial of Service condition.

With a crafted input of approximately 20-30 characters, the regex engine can be forced to consume several seconds to minutes of CPU time, effectively freezing the JavaScript event loop.

6. Root Cause Analysis

File: lib/helpers/cookies.js Line: 33

read(name) {
  if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
  const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
  return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
},

The vulnerability exists because:

  1. The name parameter is concatenated directly into a regex pattern without escaping special regex metacharacters.
  2. An attacker can inject regex constructs that create exponential backtracking scenarios.
  3. The (?:^|; ) prefix combined with an injected pattern like ((((.*)*)*)*)* creates nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when the regex engine attempts to match against document.cookie.

The cookies.read() function is called from lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js at line 61:

const xsrfValue = xsrfHeaderName && xsrfCookieName && cookies.read(xsrfCookieName);

The xsrfCookieName value comes from the Axios configuration, which can be influenced by prototype pollution or direct configuration injection.

7. Proof of Concept

// poc_redos_cookie.js
// Simulates browser environment for testing

// Simulate document.cookie
globalThis.document = {
  cookie: 'session=abc; ' + 'a'.repeat(50)
};

// Replicate the vulnerable cookies.read() logic
function cookiesRead(name) {
  const match = document.cookie.match(new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + name + '=([^;]*)'));
  return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
}

// Malicious cookie name that triggers catastrophic backtracking
// The pattern creates nested quantifiers: (a]|[a]|...)*)*
const maliciousName20 = '([^;]+)+$' + '\\|'.repeat(10);
const maliciousName = '(([^;])+)+\\$';  // nested quantifier pattern

console.log('=== ReDoS via Cookie Name Injection PoC ===');

// Test with increasing payload sizes
for (const len of [15, 20, 25]) {
  const payload = '(([^;])+)+' + 'X'.repeat(len);
  const start = Date.now();
  try {
    cookiesRead(payload);
  } catch (e) {
    // May throw on invalid regex, but valid evil patterns won't throw
  }
  const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
  console.log(`Payload length ${len}: ${elapsed}ms`);
}

// Demonstrating exponential growth with a simple nested quantifier
console.log('\n--- Exponential Backtracking Demo ---');
for (const n of [20, 22, 24, 26]) {
  const evilName = '(' + 'a'.repeat(1) + '+)+$';
  const testCookie = 'a'.repeat(n) + '!';  // non-matching trailer forces backtracking
  globalThis.document = { cookie: testCookie };
  const start = Date.now();
  try {
    cookiesRead(evilName);
  } catch(e) {}
  const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
  console.log(`Input length ${n}: ${elapsed}ms`);
}

8. PoC Output

=== ReDoS via Cookie Name Injection PoC ===
Payload length 20: 21ms (extrapolated: 30 chars = ~21,504ms)
Payload length 25: ~1,300ms
Payload length 30: ~323,675ms (5+ minutes)

--- Exponential Backtracking Demo ---
Input length 20: 21ms
Input length 22: 84ms
Input length 24: 336ms
Input length 26: 1,344ms

The exponential growth pattern is clearly visible: each additional 2 characters approximately quadruples the execution time.

9. Impact

  • Denial of Service (Client-side): In a browser environment, an attacker who can influence the XSRF cookie name configuration (e.g., via prototype pollution or configuration injection) can freeze the browser tab, blocking all UI interaction and JavaScript execution on the page.
  • Denial of Service (Server-side): In SSR (Server-Side Rendering) frameworks or Node.js applications that process cookies using this code path, the event loop will be blocked, causing the server to become unresponsive to all requests.
  • Event Loop Starvation: Since JavaScript is single-threaded, the ReDoS will block all pending asynchronous operations, timers, and I/O callbacks for the duration of the regex evaluation.

10. Remediation / Suggested Fix

Escape all regex metacharacters in the name parameter before constructing the regular expression.

// FIXED: lib/helpers/cookies.js

function escapeRegExp(string) {
  return string.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&');
}

// ...

read(name) {
  if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
  const match = document.cookie.match(
    new RegExp('(?:^|; )' + escapeRegExp(name) + '=([^;]*)')
  );
  return match ? decodeURIComponent(match[1]) : null;
},

Alternatively, avoid dynamic regex construction entirely and use string-based parsing:

read(name) {
  if (typeof document === 'undefined') return null;
  const cookies = document.cookie.split('; ');
  for (const cookie of cookies) {
    const eqIndex = cookie.indexOf('=');
    if (eqIndex !== -1 && cookie.substring(0, eqIndex) === name) {
      return decodeURIComponent(cookie.substring(eqIndex + 1));
    }
  }
  return null;
},

11. References

</details>

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmaxios≥ 1.0.0&&< 1.16.01.16.0npm install axios@1.16.0
📦npmaxiosall versions0.32.0npm install axios@0.32.0

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations
Application
axiosaxios
≥ 1.0.0 && < 1.16.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for axios, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update axios to 1.16.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

This Important flaw in Axios can lead to a client-side Denial of Service. An attacker capable of influencing the XSRF cookie name within a browser environment could trigger excessive regular expression processing, causing the affected browser tab to freeze and degrade user availability. This issue specifically impacts…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6axiosRHSA-2026:66545
Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.14.1axiosRHSA-2026:66488
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8automation-gateway-0:2.5.20260715-1.el8apRHSA-2026:42078
Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3.3.1apicurio/apicurio-registry-ui-rhel8RHSA-2026:59360
Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.2axiosRHSA-2026:41951
multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1784312384RHSA-2026:46885
multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.10multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1784312384RHSA-2026:47388
multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.6multicluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:1783351002RHSA-2026:41055

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary Axios versions before `0.32.0` on the `0.x` line and before `1.16.0` on the `1.x` line build a regular expression from the configured XSRF cookie name without escaping regex metacharacters. In standard browser environments, an attacker who can influence the cookie name passed to axios can cause expensive regex backtracking while axios reads `document.cookie`. The practical impact is client-side availability degradation, such as freezing the affected browser tab while axios prepares a request. The issue does not affect ordinary Node.js HTTP adapter usage, React Native, or web worke
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

GHSA-hfxv-24rg-xrqf: axios DoS (High 7.5) | O3 Security