Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-h6c8-cww8-35hf

OpenFGA has an Authorization Bypass through cached keys

Also known asCVE-2026-33729GO-2026-4857
Published
Mar 26, 2026
Updated
Mar 27, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk15th percentile+0.22%
0.00%0.25%0.49%0.74%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.2%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/openfga/openfga

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Description

In OpenFGA, under specific conditions, models using conditions with caching enabled can result in two different check requests producing the same cache key. This can result in OpenFGA reusing an earlier cached result for a different request.

Am I Affected?

Users are affected if the following preconditions are met:

  1. The model has relations which rely on condition evaluation.
  2. Caching is enabled.

Fix

Upgrade to OpenFGA v1.13.1.

Acknowledgement

OpenFGA would like to thank @Amemoyoi for the discovery and responsible disclosure.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/openfga/openfgaall versions1.13.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/openfga/openfga. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/openfga/openfga to 1.13.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-h6c8-cww8-35hf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-h6c8-cww8-35hf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-h6c8-cww8-35hf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Description In OpenFGA, under specific conditions, models using conditions with caching enabled can result in two different check requests producing the same cache key. This can result in OpenFGA reusing an earlier cached result for a different request. ### Am I Affected? Users are affected if the following preconditions are met: 1. The model has relations which rely on condition evaluation. 1. Caching is enabled. ### Fix Upgrade to OpenFGA v1.13.1. ### Acknowledgement OpenFGA would like to thank @Amemoyoi for the discovery and responsible disclosure.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-h6c8-cww8-35hf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-h6c8-cww8-35hf across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-h6c8-cww8-35hf: OpenFGA has an Authorization Bypass throug… | O3 Security