GHSA-h5j9-cvrw-v5qh
HIGHGHSA-h5j9-cvrw-v5qh is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) CWE-613 vulnerability in github.com/knadh/listmonk. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-h5j9-cvrw-v5qh is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
listmonk's active sessions remain valid after password reset and password change
Blast Radius
github.com/knadh/listmonkReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A session management vulnerability allows previously issued authenticated sessions to remain valid after sensitive account security changes, specifically password reset and password change. As a result, an attacker who has already obtained a valid session cookie can retain access to the account even after the victim changes or resets their password.
This weakens account recovery and session security guarantees. I reproduced the issue on listmonk v6.0.0.
Details
The application updates account credentials successfully, but existing active sessions are not revoked afterward.
This behavior was confirmed in two flows:
-
Password reset flow
- A user resets their password through the forgot/reset flow.
- The old password becomes invalid.
- The new password works.
- However, a session cookie issued before the reset remains valid and continues to authenticate successfully.
-
Authenticated password change flow
- The same user logs in from two separate sessions.
- Using session A, the password is changed through the authenticated profile endpoint.
- The old password becomes invalid.
- The new password works.
- However, session B, issued before the password change, remains valid and continues to authenticate successfully.
From the source review, the reset flow consumes the reset token, updates the password, and creates a fresh session, but there does not appear to be any revocation of older sessions. The same applies to the profile password change flow.
Relevant code areas observed during review:
cmd/auth.go— forgot/reset flowcmd/users.go— authenticated profile update flowinternal/core/users.go— password update path
Additionally:
- It was verified that reset links are single-use.
- It was verified that password reset on a TOTP-enabled account still enforces TOTP on fresh login.
- However, already-issued sessions still remain valid after reset.
PoC
Case 1: Password reset does not revoke existing session
- Create or use a normal user account.
- Log in as that user and save the authenticated session cookie.
- Trigger forgot-password for the account.
- Use the emailed reset link and set a new password.
- Verify:
- the old password no longer works
- the new password works
- Replay the old pre-reset session cookie against an authenticated endpoint such as
/api/profile.
Example validation request:
GET /api/profile HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:9000
Cookie: session=<old_pre_reset_session>
Observed result:
Server returns HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Response contains the authenticated user profile
Case 2: Password change does not revoke other active sessions
-
Log in twice as the same user and save two authenticated session cookies:
- session A
- session B
-
Using session A, change the password through the authenticated profile update endpoint.
-
Verify:
- the old password no longer works
- the new password works
-
Replay session B against an authenticated endpoint such as
/api/profile.
Example password change request:
PUT /api/profile HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:9000
Cookie: session=<session_A>
Content-Type: application/json
{
"name":"victim1",
"email":"[email protected]",
"password":"VictimChanged123"
}
Then validate session B:
GET /api/profile HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:9000
Cookie: session=<session_B>
Observed result:
- Server returns
HTTP/1.1 200 OK - Response contains the authenticated user profile
Impact
This issue allows persistence of unauthorized access after credential recovery actions.
If an attacker has already stolen a valid session cookie through any means (for example malware, browser compromise, XSS, shared machine access, proxy leakage, or other session theft), the victim cannot fully recover the account by changing or resetting the password alone. The attacker’s existing session remains valid.
This impacts account recovery expectations and session security for all authenticated users, including users with TOTP enabled.
Attachment
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/knadh/listmonk | ≥ 1.1.1-0.20241028090858-319053dd7a90&&< 1.1.1-0.20260329113754-1b5e8d38c778 | 1.1.1-0.20260329113754-1b5e8d38c778 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/knadh/listmonk. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update github.com/knadh/listmonk to 1.1.1-0.20260329113754-1b5e8d38c778 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-h5j9-cvrw-v5qh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-h5j9-cvrw-v5qh is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-h5j9-cvrw-v5qh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-h5j9-cvrw-v5qh in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-h5j9-cvrw-v5qh across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.