Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7

CRITICALFix: fission/fission#3391

GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.9) Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in github.com/fission/fission. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Fission Environment CRD podspec passthrough enables hostPID/hostNetwork/privileged pods, node escape

Also known asCVE-2026-50564GO-2026-5855
Published
Jun 30, 2026
Updated
Jul 7, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Jul 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/fission/fission

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Fission's Environment CRD exposes spec.runtime.podSpec and spec.builder.podSpec, which are merged into the Kubernetes pod specs for runtime and builder pods. The merge logic propagated hostNetwork, hostPID, hostIPC, container privileged, and serviceAccountName from the user-supplied podspec with no filtering, and Environment.Validate performed no security-relevant checks on these fields.

Details

A namespace user with create/update on environments.fission.io could produce privileged, host-network, hostPID pods in the Fission function or builder namespace. Because the Helm chart created the fission-function and fission-builder namespaces with no pod-security.kubernetes.io/enforce labels, Kubernetes Pod Security Admission did not catch the escape either.

From a host-network privileged pod with hostPID, the attacker could nsenter into the host, read cloud-metadata credentials, access the container-runtime socket, pivot to other namespaces, and fully compromise the node.

Impact

environments.fission.io create/update RBAC is escalated to node compromise — host filesystem and network access on the scheduling node, and from there potential cluster-wide takeover.

Fix

Fixed in #3391 and released in v1.24.0. Denylist at admission (the primary defence) plus belt-and-braces at the merge layer.

Admission denylist (pkg/apis/core/v1/podspec_safety.go::ValidatePodSpecSafety), called from Environment.Validate for both Runtime.PodSpec and Builder.PodSpec:

  • pod-level: HostNetwork, HostPID, HostIPC, ServiceAccountName / DeprecatedServiceAccount override, hostPath volumes;
  • per-container: SecurityContext.Privileged=true, SecurityContext.AllowPrivilegeEscalation=true, dangerous capabilities (SYS_ADMIN, NET_ADMIN, SYS_PTRACE, SYS_MODULE, DAC_READ_SEARCH, DAC_OVERRIDE).

Update-bypass closed: the Environment validating-webhook marker is extended from verbs=create to verbs=create;update (chart and envtest manifests aligned).

Merge-layer belt-and-braces (pkg/executor/util/merge.go): even if admission is bypassed (failurePolicy=Ignore or stale pre-webhook objects), the denylisted pod-level fields are stripped and per-container dangerous settings are sanitized before the merge (with SecurityContext deep-copied first so cached informer objects are not mutated). Legitimate operator hardening via the chart's pod-level securityContext (fsGroup, runAsNonRoot, runAsUser) still flows through.

Behavioural change

Environments that explicitly set any denylisted field are now rejected at admission. There is no legitimate Fission use case — these primitives exist for cluster operators, not Environment authors.

This is the same root cause and fix as GHSA-wmgg-3p4h-48x7.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/fission/fissionall versions1.24.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/fission/fission. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/fission/fission to 1.24.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Fission's `Environment` CRD exposes `spec.runtime.podSpec` and `spec.builder.podSpec`, which are merged into the Kubernetes pod specs for runtime and builder pods. The merge logic propagated `hostNetwork`, `hostPID`, `hostIPC`, container `privileged`, and `serviceAccountName` from the user-supplied podspec with no filtering, and `Environment.Validate` performed no security-relevant checks on these fields. ### Details A namespace user with `create`/`update` on `environments.fission.io` could produce privileged, host-network, hostPID pods in the Fission function or builder namesp
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-gx55-f84r-v3r7 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.