Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-33805 @fastify/reply-from

CVE-2026-33805 is a CWE-644 vulnerability in @fastify/reply-from. A fix is available for @fastify/reply-from — see the affected versions and patch details below.

@fastify/reply-from vulnerable to connection header abuse enabling stripping of proxy-added headers

Also known asGHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37
Published
Apr 15, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-33805.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs38th percentile — riskier than 38% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

39other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@fastify/reply-fromnpm
308Kdownloads / week
@fastify/http-proxynpm
228Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

@fastify/reply-from and @fastify/http-proxy process the client's Connection header after the proxy has added its own headers via rewriteRequestHeaders. This allows attackers to retroactively strip proxy-added headers (like access control or identification headers) from upstream requests by listing them in the Connection header value. This affects applications using these plugins with custom header injection for routing, access control, or security purposes.

Details

The vulnerability exists in @fastify/reply-from/lib/request.js at lines 128-136 (HTTP/1.1 handler) and lines 191-200 (undici handler). The processing flow is:

  1. Client headers are copied including the connection header (@fastify/reply-from/index.js line 91)
  2. The proxy adds custom headers via rewriteRequestHeaders (line 151)
  3. During request construction, the transport handlers read the client's Connection header and strip any headers listed in it
  4. This stripping happens after rewriteRequestHeaders, allowing clients to target proxy-added headers for removal

RFC 7230 Section 6.1 Connection header processing is intended for proxies to strip hop-by-hop headers from incoming requests before adding their own headers. The current implementation reverses this order, processing the client's Connection header after the proxy has already modified the header set.

The call chain:

  1. @fastify/reply-from/index.js line 91: headers = { ...req.headers } — copies ALL client headers including connection
  2. index.js line 151: requestHeaders = rewriteRequestHeaders(this.request, headers) — proxy adds custom headers (e.g., x-forwarded-by)
  3. index.js line 180: requestImpl({...headers: requestHeaders...}) — passes headers to transport
  4. request.js line 191 (undici): getConnectionHeaders(req.headers) — reads Connection header FROM THE CLIENT
  5. request.js lines 198-200: Strips headers listed in Connection — including proxy-added headers

This is distinct from the general hop-by-hop forwarding concern — it's specifically about the client controlling which headers get stripped from the upstream request via the Connection header, subverting the proxy's rewriteRequestHeaders function.

PoC

Self-contained reproduction with an upstream echo service and a proxy that adds a custom header:

const fastify = require('fastify');

async function test() {
  // Upstream service that echoes headers
  const upstream = fastify({ logger: false });
  upstream.get('/api/echo-headers', async (request) => {
    return { headers: request.headers };
  });
  await upstream.listen({ port: 19801 });

  // Proxy that adds a custom header via rewriteRequestHeaders
  const proxy = fastify({ logger: false });
  await proxy.register(require('@fastify/reply-from'), {
    base: 'http://localhost:19801'
  });

  proxy.get('/proxy/*', async (request, reply) => {
    const target = '/' + (request.params['*'] || '');
    return reply.from(target, {
      rewriteRequestHeaders: (originalReq, headers) => {
        return { ...headers, 'x-forwarded-by': 'fastify-proxy' };
      }
    });
  });

  await proxy.listen({ port: 19800 });

  // Baseline: proxy adds x-forwarded-by header
  const res1 = await proxy.inject({
    method: 'GET',
    url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers'
  });
  console.log('Baseline response headers from upstream:');
  const body1 = JSON.parse(res1.body);
  console.log('  x-forwarded-by:', body1.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT');

  // Attack: Connection header strips the proxy-added header
  const res2 = await proxy.inject({
    method: 'GET',
    url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers',
    headers: { 'connection': 'x-forwarded-by' }
  });
  console.log('\nAttack response headers from upstream:');
  const body2 = JSON.parse(res2.body);
  console.log('  x-forwarded-by:', body2.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT (stripped!)');

  await proxy.close();
  await upstream.close();
}
test();

Actual output:

Baseline response headers from upstream:
  x-forwarded-by: fastify-proxy

Attack response headers from upstream:
  x-forwarded-by: NOT PRESENT (stripped!)

The x-forwarded-by header that the proxy explicitly added in rewriteRequestHeaders is stripped before reaching the upstream.

Multiple headers can be stripped at once by sending Connection: x-forwarded-by, x-forwarded-for.

Both the undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers in @fastify/reply-from are affected, as well as @fastify/http-proxy which delegates to @fastify/reply-from.

Impact

Attackers can selectively remove any header added by the proxy's rewriteRequestHeaders function. This enables several attack scenarios:

  1. Bypass proxy identification: Strip headers that identify requests as coming through the proxy, potentially bypassing upstream controls that differentiate between direct and proxied requests
  2. Circumvent access control: If the proxy adds headers used for routing, authorization, or security decisions (e.g., x-internal-auth, x-proxy-token), attackers can strip them to access unauthorized resources
  3. Remove arbitrary headers: Any header can be targeted, including Connection: authorization to strip authentication or Connection: x-forwarded-for, x-forwarded-by to remove multiple headers at once

This vulnerability affects deployments where the proxy adds security-relevant headers that downstream services rely on for access control decisions. It undermines the security model where proxies act as trusted intermediaries adding authentication or routing signals.

Affected Versions

  • @fastify/reply-from — All versions, both undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers
  • @fastify/http-proxy — All versions (delegates to @fastify/reply-from)
  • Any configuration using rewriteRequestHeaders to add headers that could be security-relevant
  • No special configuration required to exploit — works with default settings

Suggested Fix

The Connection header from the client should be processed and consumed before rewriteRequestHeaders is called, not after. Alternatively, the Connection header processing in request.js should maintain a list of headers that existed in the original client request and only strip those, not headers added by rewriteRequestHeaders.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@fastify/reply-fromall versions12.6.2npm install @fastify/reply-from@12.6.2
📦npm@fastify/http-proxyall versions11.4.4npm install @fastify/http-proxy@11.4.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @fastify/reply-from, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @fastify/reply-from to 12.6.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-33805 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-33805 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-33805. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

An Important flaw exists in @fastify/reply-from and @fastify/http-proxy, allowing a remote attacker to bypass security, routing, or access control mechanisms. This is achieved by manipulating the Connection header in client requests, which can remove critical proxy-added headers. If reply-from or http-proxy are being…

ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.27devspaces/dashboard-rhel9:1776795511RHSA-2026:10175

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `@fastify/reply-from` and `@fastify/http-proxy` process the client's `Connection` header after the proxy has added its own headers via `rewriteRequestHeaders`. This allows attackers to retroactively strip proxy-added headers (like access control or identification headers) from upstream requests by listing them in the `Connection` header value. This affects applications using these plugins with custom header injection for routing, access control, or security purposes. ### Details The vulnerability exists in `@fastify/reply-from/lib/request.js` at lines 128-136 (HTTP/1.1 handler)
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-33805 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-33805 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-33805: @fastify/reply-from | O3 Security