Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-41890 ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms

Fix: ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms@2f38284

CVE-2026-41890 is a Improper Input Validation vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. A fix is available for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms — see the affected versions and patch details below.

CI4MS: Arbitrary Database Table Drop via Theme deleteProcess

Also known asGHSA-vgrf-pr28-vf98
Published
May 7, 2026
Updated
Aug 12, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-41890.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs28th percentile — riskier than 28% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The deleteProcess() action accepts a POST parameter tables[] containing arbitrary table names. These are passed directly to $forge->dropTable() without validating that the tables belong to the theme being deleted.

The deleteConfirm view correctly populates tables[] from the theme's own migration files, but the server-side deleteProcess does not verify the received values against those files. An authenticated admin can craft a POST request with arbitrary table names and drop any table in the database.

This is a real bug even within the admin trust model: the action should be scoped to the theme's own tables. The permission grants delete this theme's data", not "drop any table".

Details

Location

modules/Theme/Controllers/Theme.php :: deleteProcess() ~line 147

Vulnerable Code

public function deleteProcess(string $slug)
{
    $themeName = $slug;
    $activeTheme = setting('App.siteTheme');
    if ($activeTheme === $themeName) {
        return redirect()->route('templateSettings')...;
    }

    $tablesToDrop = $this->request->getPost('tables');  // ← user-supplied, unvalidated
    if (!empty($tablesToDrop) && is_array($tablesToDrop)) {
        $forge = \Config\Database::forge();
        $db    = \Config\Database::connect();
        foreach ($tablesToDrop as $table) {
            if ($db->tableExists($table)) {
                $forge->dropTable($table, true);  // ← no whitelist check
            }
        }
    }

PoC

  1. Authenticate to the backend (any user with theme.delete permission)
  2. POST to /backend/themes/delete-process/<any_non_active_theme_slug>
  3. Include tables[]=<any_table> in POST body
  4. The named tables are dropped without validation

Impact

  • Dropped ci4ms_blog (confirmed in test)
  • Dropped ci4ms_users + ci4ms_auth_identities simultaneously — disables all authentication (confirmed)
  • Any table in the database can be targeted

Additional note

Quick note on the design intent for deleteProcess — I noticed delete_confirm.php scopes the checkboxes to the theme's own migration files, and the CHANGELOG confirms the selective deletion was intentional (admins can choose which tables to keep). The server-side deleteProcess already has all the information it needs to validate the input — deleteConfirm derives the valid table set from the migration files, deleteProcess just needs to do the same before acting on the POST. Happy to clarify if useful.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistci4-cms-erp/ci4ms0.31.1.0&&< 0.31.8.00.31.8.0composer require ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms:^0.31.8.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.8.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-41890 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-41890 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to CVE-2026-41890. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The `deleteProcess()` action accepts a POST parameter `tables[]` containing arbitrary table names. These are passed directly to `$forge->dropTable()` without validating that the tables belong to the theme being deleted. The `deleteConfirm` view correctly populates `tables[]` from the theme's own migration files, but the server-side `deleteProcess` does not verify the received values against those files. An authenticated admin can craft a POST request with arbitrary table names and drop any table in the database. This is a real bug even within the admin trust model: the action sho
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-41890 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds CVE-2026-41890 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

CVE-2026-41890: ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms | O3 Security