CVE-2026-41890 — ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms
Fix: ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms@2f38284CVE-2026-41890 is a Improper Input Validation vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. A fix is available for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms — see the affected versions and patch details below.
CI4MS: Arbitrary Database Table Drop via Theme deleteProcess
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-41890.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
ci4-cms-erp/ci4msReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The deleteProcess() action accepts a POST parameter tables[] containing arbitrary table names. These are passed directly to $forge->dropTable() without validating that the tables belong to the theme being deleted.
The deleteConfirm view correctly populates tables[] from the theme's own migration files, but the server-side deleteProcess does not verify the received values against those files. An authenticated admin can craft a POST request with arbitrary table names and drop any table in the database.
This is a real bug even within the admin trust model: the action should be scoped to the theme's own tables. The permission grants delete this theme's data", not "drop any table".
Details
Location
modules/Theme/Controllers/Theme.php :: deleteProcess() ~line 147
Vulnerable Code
public function deleteProcess(string $slug)
{
$themeName = $slug;
$activeTheme = setting('App.siteTheme');
if ($activeTheme === $themeName) {
return redirect()->route('templateSettings')...;
}
$tablesToDrop = $this->request->getPost('tables'); // ← user-supplied, unvalidated
if (!empty($tablesToDrop) && is_array($tablesToDrop)) {
$forge = \Config\Database::forge();
$db = \Config\Database::connect();
foreach ($tablesToDrop as $table) {
if ($db->tableExists($table)) {
$forge->dropTable($table, true); // ← no whitelist check
}
}
}
PoC
- Authenticate to the backend (any user with theme.delete permission)
- POST to
/backend/themes/delete-process/<any_non_active_theme_slug> - Include
tables[]=<any_table>in POST body - The named tables are dropped without validation
Impact
- Dropped
ci4ms_blog(confirmed in test) - Dropped
ci4ms_users+ci4ms_auth_identitiessimultaneously — disables all authentication (confirmed) - Any table in the database can be targeted
Additional note
Quick note on the design intent for deleteProcess — I noticed delete_confirm.php scopes the checkboxes to the theme's own migration files, and the CHANGELOG confirms the selective deletion was intentional (admins can choose which tables to keep). The server-side deleteProcess already has all the information it needs to validate the input — deleteConfirm derives the valid table set from the migration files, deleteProcess just needs to do the same before acting on the POST. Happy to clarify if useful.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms | ≥ 0.31.1.0&&< 0.31.8.0 | 0.31.8.0composer require ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms:^0.31.8.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.8.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-41890 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like CVE-2026-41890 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to CVE-2026-41890. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-41890 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds CVE-2026-41890 across Packagist dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.