Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m arches

HIGHFix: archesproject/arches@7ed53e2

GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) SQL Injection vulnerability in arches. A fix is available for arches — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Arches vulnerable to execution of arbitrary SQL

Also known asCVE-2022-41892PYSEC-2022-42985
Published
Nov 11, 2022
Updated
Feb 17, 2025
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 19, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs47th percentile — riskier than 47% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐍arches🐍arches🐍arches

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

With a carefully crafted web request, it's possible to execute certain unwanted sql statements against the database.
Anyone running the impacted versions (<=6.1.1, 6.2.0, >=7.0.0, <=7.1.1) should upgrade as soon as possible.

Patches

The problem has been patched in the following versions: 6.1.2, 6.2.1, and 7.2.0 Users are strongly urged to upgrade to the most recent relevant patch.

Workarounds

There are no workarounds.

General References

https://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_injection.asp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL_injection

For more information

Post any questions to the Arches project forum.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIarchesall versions6.1.2pip install --upgrade 'arches==6.1.2'
🐍PyPIarches6.2.0&&< 6.2.16.2.1pip install --upgrade 'arches==6.2.1'
🐍PyPIarches7.0.0&&< 7.2.07.2.0pip install --upgrade 'arches==7.2.0'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for arches, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update arches to 6.1.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact With a carefully crafted web request, it's possible to execute certain unwanted sql statements against the database. Anyone running the impacted versions (<=6.1.1, 6.2.0, >=7.0.0, <=7.1.1) should upgrade as soon as possible. ### Patches The problem has been patched in the following versions: [6.1.2](https://pypi.org/project/arches/6.1.2/), [6.2.1](https://pypi.org/project/arches/6.2.1/), and [7.2.0](https://pypi.org/project/arches/7.2.0/) Users are strongly urged to upgrade to the most recent relevant patch. ### Workarounds There are no workarounds. ### General References http
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-gmpq-xrxj-xh8m: arches (High 8.6) | O3 Security