GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm
GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm is a CWE-61 vulnerability in pdm. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
PDM: Project-Local State and Config Writes Follow Symlinks
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
pdmReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
PDM writes several project-local state or configuration files without symlink protection. If a malicious repository places those files as symlinks, local PDM operations can overwrite the symlink targets.
This creates an arbitrary file clobber primitive relative to the privileges of the invoking user.
Affected Behavior
- Project-local config writes can affect files outside the repository
- The most stable demonstrated sink is
pdm.toml - Related sinks include
.pdm-pythonand.python-version
Affected Code
src/pdm/project/config.py:303-350src/pdm/project/core.py:209-217src/pdm/cli/commands/use.py:187-189
Technical Details
Config.__init__() resolves the project-local pdm.toml path and _save_config() writes to the resolved target. If PROJECT_ROOT/pdm.toml is a symlink to another file, pdm config -l ... updates the target file instead of refusing the write.
The same general problem exists for other project-local persistence paths that are written directly with no lstat / O_NOFOLLOW protection.
For the pdm.toml PoC specifically, the target file must already contain parseable TOML. Otherwise the load step fails before the write path is reached. That parser constraint does not apply to the .pdm-python or .python-version sinks.
Impact
- Arbitrary file clobber as the invoking user
- Destructive modification of local files outside the repository root
- Useful primitive for privilege abuse when
pdmis run in elevated contexts
Reproduction
PoC:
# Replace this with a Python interpreter that can run `python -m pdm`.
PDM_PY=/path/to/python-with-pdm
tmpdir=$(mktemp -d)
target="$tmpdir/clobbered-target.toml"
cat > "$target" <<'EOF'
[seed]
value = 1
EOF
ln -s "$target" "$tmpdir/pdm.toml"
cat > "$tmpdir/pyproject.toml" <<'EOF'
[project]
name = "symlink-clobber-demo"
version = "0.0.1"
EOF
(
cd "$tmpdir" &&
"$PDM_PY" -m pdm config -l venv.in_project false
)
cat "$target"
Expected result:
- A temporary project is created
pdm.tomlis a symlink to another TOML file- Running
pdm config -l venv.in_project falsemodifies the symlink target
Observed output from local validation:
--- target ---
[seed]
value = 1
[venv]
in_project = false
Severity
Medium
CVSS v4.0
- Base score:
6.8(Medium) - Vector:
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Rationale:
AV:L: exploitation requires local execution ofpdmagainst an attacker-prepared checkoutAC:L: there is no complex constraint once the symlink sink existsAT:N: no extra prerequisite beyond the victim running the relevant command is requiredPR:N: the attacker does not need prior privileges on the victim systemUI:A: the victim must actively run a command that writes project-local state or configVC:N: the demonstrated issue is a write primitive, not a direct read primitiveVI:H: the attacker can cause unauthorized modification of files outside the repository rootVA:L: file clobber can disrupt local operation, but direct same-step availability impact is lower than a full RCESC:N/SI:N/SA:N: the base score is limited to the directly affected system
Root Cause
Project-local file sinks are treated as trusted regular files and are written without symlink checks or guarded atomic replacement.
Recommended Remediation
- Refuse to write project-local config/state files when the destination is a symlink
- Use
lstatandO_NOFOLLOWwhere available - Avoid resolving attacker-controlled project-local paths before writing
- Use atomic temp-file replacement only after confirming the destination is a regular file
Disclosure Notes
This issue is independent from the code-execution issues above. It is best tracked as a separate CVE candidate because the root cause and remediation are different.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | pdm | all versions | 2.27.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pdm. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update pdm to 2.27.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-ghq2-5c67-fprm across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.