Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Langflow : Cross-user flow access and vertex execution via deprecated /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices endpointsGHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw

MEDIUMFix: langflow-ai/langflow#13153

GHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.4) CWE-639 vulnerability in langflow. A fix is available for langflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-105698PYSEC-2026-4234PYSEC-2026-4238
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 23, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs7th percentile — riskier than 7% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐍langflow🐍langflow-base

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Before Langflow 1.10.1, two deprecated but still-routed endpoints in the chat API did not check that the authenticated caller owns the flow referenced in the URL path:

  • POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices (retrieve_vertices_order)
  • POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices/{vertex_id} (build_vertex)

Any authenticated user who knows (or obtains) another user's flow_id could load that user's private flow graph, enumerate its vertex IDs, and build (execute) individual vertices of it, receiving the vertex results in the response.

Both routes are declared with deprecated=True, include_in_schema=False, so they do not appear in the OpenAPI docs, but they remained registered on the router. The Langflow UI no longer calls them (it uses POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/flow), so they are only reachable by direct HTTP requests.

The issue is fixed in Langflow 1.10.1 (langflow-base 0.10.1) by #13153.

Details

In affected versions, both handlers go straight to the graph loader:

  • retrieve_vertices_order (src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/chat.py, lines 81-159 in 1.9.1) only required authentication via dependencies=[Depends(get_current_active_user)]. The user was never injected into the handler, and the flow was loaded with build_graph_from_db(flow_id=flow_id, ...).
  • build_vertex (chat.py, lines 320-491 in 1.9.1) receives current_user, but only uses it for variable resolution (user_id=str(current_user.id)). It is never used to scope the flow lookup. The graph is taken from the chat-service cache keyed by flow_id, or rebuilt with build_graph_from_db on a cache miss.
  • build_graph_from_db_no_cache (src/backend/base/langflow/api/utils/flow_utils.py) does a bare primary-key lookup, session.get(Flow, flow_id), with no owner filter.

The supported replacement, POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/flow, already restricted the lookup to the owner or a PUBLIC flow (added in #12305 for GHSA-qj98-rhf8-v93f). The deprecated siblings were not covered by that fix, nor by the _read_flow fix for GHSA-8c4j-f57c-35cf.

Additional side effects in affected versions:

  • retrieve_vertices_order stores the graph in the chat-service cache under the victim's flow_id (chat_service.set_cache(str(flow_id), graph)). When the request includes a data body, the cached graph is attacker-supplied.
  • build_vertex schedules log_vertex_build for the victim's flow_id, so attacker-triggered builds are recorded in the victim flow's vertex build history.

Note on older versions: up to and including 1.7.1, these two routes had no authentication dependency at all. Authentication was added in 1.7.2 by #10977, but no ownership check was added. This advisory covers the missing ownership check, which is present in every release from 1.0.0 (when the routes were introduced) through 1.10.0.

Attack scenario

  1. The attacker authenticates as any valid user.
  2. The attacker obtains a victim flow_id (shared URLs, exported flow files, logs, screenshots, etc.).
  3. POST /api/v1/build/{victim_flow_id}/vertices returns 200 OK with {"ids": [...], "run_id": "...", "vertices_to_run": [...]} listing the victim flow's vertex IDs (component type plus suffix, e.g. ChatInput-abc12).
  4. The attacker calls POST /api/v1/build/{victim_flow_id}/vertices/{vertex_id} for a returned ID. The victim's graph is loaded and the vertex is built. Its results, outputs and artifacts are returned to the attacker.

Impact

  • Confidentiality (Low): Discloses the structure of private flows (vertex IDs and component types) and the outputs of vertices the attacker chooses to build. That includes values hardcoded in node configuration, such as prompt text or fixed inputs.
    • Global variables and credentials in the variable store are not exposed, because variable resolution uses the caller's user_id.
    • The victim's stored flow definition is not returned wholesale.
  • Integrity (Low): The attacker can trigger execution of the victim's nodes, including any side effects baked into their configuration (fixed endpoints, webhooks, hardcoded API keys). Build records are written under the victim's flow_id. The attacker cannot modify the stored flow.
  • Availability: None.

The attacker must be authenticated and must know the target flow UUID. Flow UUIDs are random v4 values, so blind enumeration is not practical.

Proof of concept

Observed on langflow==1.9.1 using the project's test client and in-memory SQLite fixtures (see the attached poc.zip):

RequestExpected (hardened)Observed on 1.9.1
Attacker → POST /api/v1/build/{victim_flow_id}/vertices404 Not Found200 OK with vertex order payload
Attacker → POST /api/v1/build/{victim_flow_id}/vertices/<bogus-id>404 Not Found500 {"detail":"Vertex <id> not found"}: the victim graph was loaded before the vertex lookup failed
Owner (control) → same endpointsnon-404non-404

On 1.10.1 and later, the attacker requests return 404 Not Found. This is covered by regression tests in src/backend/tests/unit/test_endpoints.py:

  • test_get_vertices_returns_404_for_other_users_private_flow
  • test_get_vertices_with_supplied_data_returns_404_for_other_users_private_flow
  • test_build_vertex_returns_404_for_other_users_private_flow

Patches

Fixed in Langflow 1.10.1 (langflow-base 0.10.1) by #13153 (merge commit fb3d6ec90b). Both handlers now:

  1. inject current_user (for retrieve_vertices_order, this replaces the dependencies-only declaration),
  2. load the flow with an owner-scoped query and return 404 when it is not found, so a flow you don't own looks the same as a missing flow, and
  3. call ensure_flow_permission(current_user, FlowAction.EXECUTE, ...) before building or caching any graph.
# retrieve_vertices_order / build_vertex (1.10.1)
stmt = (
    select(Flow)
    .where(Flow.id == flow_id)
    .where((Flow.user_id == current_user.id) | (Flow.access_type == AccessTypeEnum.PUBLIC))
)
flow = (await session.exec(stmt)).first()
if not flow:
    raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail=f"Flow with id {flow_id} not found")
await ensure_flow_permission(
    current_user,
    FlowAction.EXECUTE,
    flow_id=flow_id,
    flow_user_id=flow.user_id,
    workspace_id=flow.workspace_id,
    folder_id=flow.folder_id,
)

Related hardening in later releases:

  • #14342 (1.11.2) applies the same guard to the sibling GET /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/{vertex_id}/stream route.
  • #14497 (1.12.0) makes all three deprecated vertex routes owner-only, dropping the PUBLIC exception, because their graph cache is keyed by flow UUID rather than by the executing user.

Users should upgrade to 1.10.1 or later. The latest release is recommended.

Workarounds

If upgrading is not immediately possible, block POST /api/v1/build/*/vertices and POST /api/v1/build/*/vertices/* (and GET /api/v1/build/*/*/stream) at a reverse proxy. The Langflow UI does not use these routes.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlangflow≥ 1.0.0&&< 1.10.11.10.1pip install --upgrade 'langflow==1.10.1'
🐍PyPIlangflow-baseall versions0.10.1pip install --upgrade 'langflow-base==0.10.1'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update langflow to 1.10.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Before **Langflow 1.10.1**, two deprecated but still-routed endpoints in the chat API did not check that the authenticated caller owns the flow referenced in the URL path: - `POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices` (`retrieve_vertices_order`) - `POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices/{vertex_id}` (`build_vertex`) Any authenticated user who knows (or obtains) another user's `flow_id` could load that user's private flow graph, enumerate its vertex IDs, and build (execute) individual vertices of it, receiving the vertex results in the response. Both routes are declared with `depreca
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gh98-4phw-6fmw in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

Langflow : Cross-user flow access and vertex execution…