Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

CVE-2026-10561 — langflow

CRITICALFix: langflow-ai/langflow#13700

CVE-2026-10561 is a critical-severity (CVSS 10) Code Injection vulnerability in langflow. A fix is available for langflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Langflow: PythonREPLComponent executes unsandboxed Python code, enabling authenticated RCE and privilege escalation

Also known asGHSA-8qpj-27x8-pwpqPYSEC-2026-4231
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 22, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-10561.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk-0.18%
Lower risk than most CVEs57th percentile — riskier than 57% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%0.5%0.9%1.0%1.0%0.8%Jul 26Sep 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-10561 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,415 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍langflow

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Langflow's built-in Python interpreter components — PythonREPLComponent (Python Interpreter) and the legacy PythonREPLToolComponent (Python REPL Tool) — executed arbitrary user- or model-supplied Python code inside flows without effective sandboxing. Because the code ran in-process with the privileges of the Langflow service, any authenticated user who could edit and run a flow could achieve remote code execution and, from there, escalate privileges to superuser (e.g. by opening a database session and flipping is_superuser) or compromise the host.

This issue is fixed as of 1.10.1, with additional hardening through 1.12.3. See Remediation below.

Affected

  • Package: langflow (PyPI), and the underlying lfx package that ships the component.
  • Vulnerable versions: < 1.10.1.
  • Patched: 1.10.1 (core fix). Upgrade to >= 1.12.3 for the complete hardening series.

Details

The root cause is code injection (CWE-94/CWE-95): the component passed raw input to LangChain's PythonREPL, which is explicitly not a security sandbox.

Two distinct weaknesses existed before 1.10.1:

  1. Unrestricted builtins (default deployments). get_globals() built the exec globals from the global_imports allow-list but never set __builtins__. CPython's exec() then auto-injected the full builtins module, leaving __import__, open, eval, exec and the whole import machinery reachable regardless of the allow-list — e.g. __import__("os").system(...) or __import__("subprocess").check_output([...]). This made the "only modules in Global Imports can be used" guarantee false, and it applied even with the default configuration (allow_custom_components=True).

  2. No server-policy gate (locked-down deployments). Even a deployment hardened with allow_custom_components=False could still run interpreter code, because the components did not consult that policy before executing.

Both let an authenticated user run the reported PoC, which opens a DB session and sets is_superuser = True on their account, or writes to the filesystem / runs OS commands with the service's privileges.

PoC (as reported)

  1. Authenticate as a normal user.
  2. Create a flow with the PythonREPLComponent.
  3. Execute Python that imports Langflow internals and elevates the account:
import asyncio
from sqlmodel import select
from langflow.services.database.models.user.model import User
from langflow.services.deps import session_scope

async def escalate():
    async with session_scope() as session:
        stmt = select(User).where(User.username == 'testuser')
        user = (await session.exec(stmt)).first()
        if user:
            user.is_superuser = True
            session.add(user)
            await session.commit()

asyncio.run(escalate())

Impact

Any authenticated user could:

  • Execute arbitrary Python / OS commands with the Langflow service's privileges (RCE).
  • Escalate their own account to superuser via direct database access.
  • Read/modify data and configuration, and potentially pivot to the underlying host.

Remediation

Upgrade to Langflow 1.10.1 or later (preferably >= 1.12.3). The interpreter components were hardened with layered, defense-in-depth controls, applied in run_python_repl() before any code is executed:

  • Restricted builtins — get_globals() injects a curated safe_builtins() mapping, removing __import__, eval, exec, compile, open, input, globals/locals/vars, getattr/setattr, etc. (#13397)
  • AST validation — validate_code_safety() rejects inline import/from ... import, dunder/escape-gadget attribute access (__class__, __subclasses__, __globals__, frame/traceback introspection) and format-string dunder traversal. (#13397)
  • Server-policy gate — ensure_code_execution_enabled() refuses to run when allow_custom_components=False or block_code_interpreter_components=True, and fails closed if the settings stack cannot be resolved. (#13700 — this advisory — and #14375)
  • Allow-listed module proxies — imported modules are exposed via a proxy that blocks reaching sys.modules["os"] through a module's transitive import graph. (#15198)
  • Optional hardware isolation — configure LANGFLOW_SANDBOX_BACKEND to run interpreter code in an isolated microVM instead of in-process. (#14400)

Upstream fix references: #13397, #13700 (carries this GHSA), #14375, #14400, #15198.

Hardening recommendations for operators

  • Keep Langflow updated (>= 1.12.3).
  • For locked-down deployments, set LANGFLOW_ALLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS=false (or LANGFLOW_BLOCK_CODE_INTERPRETER_COMPONENTS=true) to disable the interpreter entirely.
  • For deployments that must run untrusted code, configure LANGFLOW_SANDBOX_BACKEND for microVM isolation.
  • Run the Langflow service as an unprivileged user with least-privilege database credentials.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIlangflowall versions1.10.1pip install --upgrade 'langflow==1.10.1'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
langflowlangflow
≥ 1.0.0 && ≤ 1.9.3
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for langflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update langflow to 1.10.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-10561 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Langflow's built-in Python interpreter components — `PythonREPLComponent` (Python Interpreter) and the legacy `PythonREPLToolComponent` (Python REPL Tool) — executed arbitrary user- or model-supplied Python code inside flows without effective sandboxing. Because the code ran in-process with the privileges of the Langflow service, any **authenticated** user who could edit and run a flow could achieve remote code execution and, from there, escalate privileges to superuser (e.g. by opening a database session and flipping `is_superuser`) or compromise the host. **This issue is fixed
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-10561 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-10561: langflow RCE — Fixed in 1.10.1