Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w @tinacms/graphql

HIGHFix: tinacms/tinacms@f124eab

GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in @tinacms/graphql. A fix is available for @tinacms/graphql — see the affected versions and patch details below.

@tinacms/graphql's Media Endpoints Can Escape the Media Root via Symlinks or Junctions

Also known asCVE-2026-34603
Published
Apr 1, 2026
Updated
Apr 6, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 21, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs35th percentile — riskier than 35% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

5other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@tinacms/graphqlnpm
41Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

@tinacms/cli recently added lexical path-traversal checks to the dev media routes, but the implementation still validates only the path string and does not resolve symlink or junction targets.

If a link already exists under the media root, Tina accepts a path like pivot/written-from-media.txt as "inside" the media directory and then performs real filesystem operations through that link target. This allows out-of-root media listing and write access, and the same root cause also affects delete.

Details

The dev media handlers validate user-controlled paths with:

function resolveWithinBase(userPath: string, baseDir: string): string {
  const resolvedBase = path.resolve(baseDir);
  const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, userPath));
  if (resolved === resolvedBase) {
    return resolvedBase;
  }
  if (resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep)) {
    return resolved;
  }
  throw new PathTraversalError(userPath);
}

function resolveStrictlyWithinBase(userPath: string, baseDir: string): string {
  const resolvedBase = path.resolve(baseDir) + path.sep;
  const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, userPath));
  if (!resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase)) {
    throw new PathTraversalError(userPath);
  }
  return resolved;
}

But the validated path is then used directly for real filesystem access:

filesStr = await fs.readdir(validatedPath);
...
await fs.ensureDir(path.dirname(saveTo));
file.pipe(fs.createWriteStream(saveTo));
...
await fs.remove(file);

This does not account for symlinks/junctions already present below the media root. A path such as pivot/secret.txt can be lexically inside the media directory while the filesystem target is outside it.

Local Reproduction

I verified this locally with a real junction on Windows.

Test layout:

  • media root: D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4\public\uploads
  • junction under media root: public\uploads\pivot -> D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4\outside
  • file outside the media root: outside\secret.txt

Tina's current media-path validation logic was applied and used to perform the same list/write operations the route handlers use.

Observed result:

{
  "media": {
    "base": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\public\\uploads",
    "resolvedListPath": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\public\\uploads\\pivot",
    "listedEntries": [
      "secret.txt"
    ],
    "resolvedWritePath": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\public\\uploads\\pivot\\written-from-media.txt",
    "outsideWriteExists": true,
    "outsideWriteContents": "MEDIA_ESCAPE"
  }
}

This shows the problem clearly:

  • the path validator accepted pivot
  • listing revealed a file from outside the media root
  • writing to pivot/written-from-media.txt created outside\written-from-media.txt

The delete path uses the same flawed containment model and should be hardened at the same time.

Impact

  • Out-of-root file listing via /media/list/...
  • Out-of-root file write via /media/upload/...
  • Likely out-of-root file delete via /media/... DELETE, using the same path-validation gap
  • Bypass of the recent path traversal hardening for any deployment whose media tree contains a link to another location

This is especially relevant in development and self-hosted workflows where the media directory may contain symlinks or junctions intentionally or via repository content.

Recommended Fix

Harden media path validation with canonical filesystem checks:

  1. resolve the real base path with fs.realpath()
  2. resolve the real target path, or for writes the nearest existing parent
  3. compare canonical paths rather than lexical strings
  4. reject any operation that traverses through a symlink/junction to leave the real media root

path.resolve(...).startsWith(...) is not sufficient for filesystem security on linked paths.

Resources

  • packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/commands/dev-command/server/media.ts
  • packages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/models/media.ts
  • packages/@tinacms/cli/src/utils/path.ts

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@tinacms/graphqlall versions2.2.2npm install @tinacms/graphql@2.2.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @tinacms/graphql, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @tinacms/graphql to 2.2.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `@tinacms/cli` recently added lexical path-traversal checks to the dev media routes, but the implementation still validates only the path string and does not resolve symlink or junction targets. If a link already exists under the media root, Tina accepts a path like `pivot/written-from-media.txt` as "inside" the media directory and then performs real filesystem operations through that link target. This allows out-of-root media listing and write access, and the same root cause also affects delete. ## Details The dev media handlers validate user-controlled paths with: ```ts funct
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w: High 7.1 severity | O3 Security