GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in @tinacms/graphql. A fix is available for @tinacms/graphql — see the affected versions and patch details below.
@tinacms/graphql's Media Endpoints Can Escape the Media Root via Symlinks or Junctions
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
@tinacms/graphqlnpmDescription
Summary
@tinacms/cli recently added lexical path-traversal checks to the dev media routes, but the implementation still validates only the path string and does not resolve symlink or junction targets.
If a link already exists under the media root, Tina accepts a path like pivot/written-from-media.txt as "inside" the media directory and then performs real filesystem operations through that link target. This allows out-of-root media listing and write access, and the same root cause also affects delete.
Details
The dev media handlers validate user-controlled paths with:
function resolveWithinBase(userPath: string, baseDir: string): string {
const resolvedBase = path.resolve(baseDir);
const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, userPath));
if (resolved === resolvedBase) {
return resolvedBase;
}
if (resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase + path.sep)) {
return resolved;
}
throw new PathTraversalError(userPath);
}
function resolveStrictlyWithinBase(userPath: string, baseDir: string): string {
const resolvedBase = path.resolve(baseDir) + path.sep;
const resolved = path.resolve(path.join(baseDir, userPath));
if (!resolved.startsWith(resolvedBase)) {
throw new PathTraversalError(userPath);
}
return resolved;
}
But the validated path is then used directly for real filesystem access:
filesStr = await fs.readdir(validatedPath);
...
await fs.ensureDir(path.dirname(saveTo));
file.pipe(fs.createWriteStream(saveTo));
...
await fs.remove(file);
This does not account for symlinks/junctions already present below the media root. A path such as pivot/secret.txt can be lexically inside the media directory while the filesystem target is outside it.
Local Reproduction
I verified this locally with a real junction on Windows.
Test layout:
- media root:
D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4\public\uploads - junction under media root:
public\uploads\pivot -> D:\bugcrowd\tinacms\temp\junction-repro4\outside - file outside the media root:
outside\secret.txt
Tina's current media-path validation logic was applied and used to perform the same list/write operations the route handlers use.
Observed result:
{
"media": {
"base": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\public\\uploads",
"resolvedListPath": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\public\\uploads\\pivot",
"listedEntries": [
"secret.txt"
],
"resolvedWritePath": "D:\\bugcrowd\\tinacms\\temp\\junction-repro4\\public\\uploads\\pivot\\written-from-media.txt",
"outsideWriteExists": true,
"outsideWriteContents": "MEDIA_ESCAPE"
}
}
This shows the problem clearly:
- the path validator accepted
pivot - listing revealed a file from outside the media root
- writing to
pivot/written-from-media.txtcreatedoutside\written-from-media.txt
The delete path uses the same flawed containment model and should be hardened at the same time.
Impact
- Out-of-root file listing via
/media/list/... - Out-of-root file write via
/media/upload/... - Likely out-of-root file delete via
/media/...DELETE, using the same path-validation gap - Bypass of the recent path traversal hardening for any deployment whose media tree contains a link to another location
This is especially relevant in development and self-hosted workflows where the media directory may contain symlinks or junctions intentionally or via repository content.
Recommended Fix
Harden media path validation with canonical filesystem checks:
- resolve the real base path with
fs.realpath() - resolve the real target path, or for writes the nearest existing parent
- compare canonical paths rather than lexical strings
- reject any operation that traverses through a symlink/junction to leave the real media root
path.resolve(...).startsWith(...) is not sufficient for filesystem security on linked paths.
Resources
packages/@tinacms/cli/src/next/commands/dev-command/server/media.tspackages/@tinacms/cli/src/server/models/media.tspackages/@tinacms/cli/src/utils/path.ts
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | @tinacms/graphql | all versions | 2.2.2npm install @tinacms/graphql@2.2.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @tinacms/graphql, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update @tinacms/graphql to 2.2.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-g87c-r2jp-293w across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.