Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
Maven
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r

MEDIUMFix: google/tink@93d839a

GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-176 vulnerability in com.google.crypto.tink:tink. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Ciphertext Malleability Issue in Tink Java

Also known asCVE-2020-8929PYSEC-2020-142
Published
Oct 16, 2020
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Jul 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
com.google.crypto.tink:tink

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Tink's Java version before 1.5 under some circumstances allowed attackers to change the key ID part of the ciphertext, resulting in the attacker creating a second ciphertext that will decrypt to the same plaintext. This can be a problem in particular in the case of encrypting with a deterministic AEAD with a single key, and relying on the fact that there is only a single valid ciphertext per plaintext.

No loss of confidentiality or loss of plaintext integrity occurs due to this problem, only ciphertext integrity is compromised.

Patches

The issue was fixed in this pull request.

Workarounds

The only workaround is to backport the fixing pull request.

Details

Tink uses the first five bytes of a ciphertext for a version byte and a four byte key ID. Since each key has a well defined prefix, this extends non-malleability properties (but technically not indistinguishability). However, in the Java version this prefix lookup used a hash map indexed by unicode strings instead of the byte array, which means that invalid Unicode characters would be replaced by U+FFFD by the Java API's default behavior. This means several different values for the five bytes would result in the same hash table key, which allows an attacker to exchange one invalid byte sequence for another, creating a mutated ciphertext that still decrypts (to the same plaintext).

Acknowledgements

We'd like to thank Peter Esbensen for finding this issue and raising it internally.

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

  • Open an issue in Tink

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
Mavencom.google.crypto.tink:tinkall versions1.5.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for com.google.crypto.tink:tink. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update com.google.crypto.tink:tink to 1.5.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Tink's Java version before 1.5 under some circumstances allowed attackers to change the key ID part of the ciphertext, resulting in the attacker creating a second ciphertext that will decrypt to the same plaintext. This can be a problem in particular in the case of encrypting with a deterministic AEAD with a single key, and relying on the fact that there is only a single valid ciphertext per plaintext. No loss of confidentiality or loss of plaintext integrity occurs due to this problem, only ciphertext integrity is compromised. ### Patches The issue was fixed in this [pull request
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-g5vf-v6wf-7w2r: Ciphertext Malleability… | O3 Security