CVE-2026-54653 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) Code Injection vulnerability in datamodel-code-generator. A fix is available for datamodel-code-generator — see the affected versions and patch details below.
`datamodel-code-generator` vulnerable to code injection in via attacker-controlled `default_factory` schema field
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-54653.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-54653 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 396,257 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
datamodel-code-generatorReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
datamodel-code-generator is vulnerable to code injection when generating Python models from an attacker-controlled JSON Schema, OpenAPI, YAML, JSON, Avro, Protobuf, or XSD schema. When a property carries a "default_factory" key, its value is interpolated verbatim — as a raw Python expression — into the generated Field(default_factory=...) / field(default_factory=...) call. Because this assignment is evaluated at class-definition time (i.e. on import of the generated module), an attacker who controls the schema controls a Python expression that runs in the consumer's process. No special CLI flags are required.
Details
The vulnerable chain spans the JSON-Schema-shaped parser and three sink locations (Pydantic v2, dataclass, msgspec):
Source — schema → extras:
src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py:600-614—DEFAULT_FIELD_KEYSincludes the literal string"default_factory".src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py:457-459—JsonSchemaObject.__init__stores any non-standard key (includingdefault_factory) inself.extras.src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py:797-812—get_field_extraspreservesdefault_factorythrough to the field model.
Sinks — extras → generated Python expression:
-
src/datamodel_code_generator/model/pydantic_base.py:222-249:default_factory = data.pop("default_factory", None) ... if default_factory is not None: field_arguments = [f"default_factory={default_factory}", *field_arguments]The
default_factoryvalue is interpolated raw (norepr(), no validation). -
src/datamodel_code_generator/model/dataclass.py:211:f"{k}={v if k == 'default_factory' else repr(v)}"Explicit special-case to skip
repr()fordefault_factory. -
src/datamodel_code_generator/model/msgspec.py:361— same pattern as dataclass.
Because default_factory is in DEFAULT_FIELD_KEYS, no special CLI flag is needed to reach the sink. Any input format that uses the JSON-Schema-shaped parser (jsonschema, openapi, yaml, json, dict, csv) — and any input format that converts to it (avro, protobuf, xmlschema) — is in scope.
Confirmed PoC matrix
| Input file type | Output model type | Result |
|---|---|---|
jsonschema | pydantic_v2.BaseModel | RCE on import |
jsonschema | dataclasses.dataclass | RCE on import |
jsonschema | msgspec.Struct | RCE on import |
jsonschema | typing.TypedDict | safe (TypedDict doesn't render field(); default_factory silently dropped) |
openapi | pydantic_v2.BaseModel | RCE on import |
Other JSON-Schema-shaped inputs (yaml, json, dict, csv, avro, protobuf, xmlschema) follow the same code path and are expected to reproduce.
PoC
Self contained Proof of Concept is available at my secret gist: https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/9648b0fe4fcf7d569ac8e61dd11eebaf
Impact
- Who's affected: any developer or CI pipeline that runs
datamodel-codegenagainst a schema they didn't author themselves — third-party API specs, schemas pulled from a registry, vendored upstream.json/.yaml/.avsc/.proto/.xsdfiles, schemas fetched from a remote URL or introspection endpoint — and who imports the generated.py. - What it gains: arbitrary Python code execution in the importer's process at
importtime. The PoC copies/etc/passwdto a tmp file to demonstrate arbitrary read; the same primitive supports any operation the importing process can perform (filesystem write, environment exfiltration, secondary network calls, RCE on CI runners). - What it does NOT need: no special CLI flags, no custom templates, no
--extra-template-data, no--use-schema-description. Default invocation against a malicious schema is sufficient. - What does block it: choosing
--output-model-type typing.TypedDict(which doesn't renderfield()/Field()calls). All other supported output model types are vulnerable.
Resolution
The fix validates schema-provided default_factory values while extracting JSON Schema field extras. Only the supported factory names dict, list, and set are accepted; any other value now raises a generator error before code generation. Generator-created default factories for supported mutable defaults and optional nested models continue to use the existing code paths.
Remediation
Upgrade to datamodel-code-generator 0.60.2 or later.
This issue affects datamodel-code-generator versions >= 0.17.0, <= 0.60.1 and is fixed in 0.60.2.
Submitted by: Hamza Haroon (thegr1ffyn)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | datamodel-code-generator | ≥ 0.17.0&&< 0.60.2 | 0.60.2pip install --upgrade 'datamodel-code-generator==0.60.2' |
Affected Products
datamodel-code-generatorkoxudaxiDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for datamodel-code-generator, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update datamodel-code-generator to 0.60.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-54653 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-54653 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.