Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-54653 — datamodel-code-generator

HIGHFix: koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator@17fc235

CVE-2026-54653 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.8) Code Injection vulnerability in datamodel-code-generator. A fix is available for datamodel-code-generator — see the affected versions and patch details below.

`datamodel-code-generator` vulnerable to code injection in via attacker-controlled `default_factory` schema field

Also known asGHSA-386q-5hp3-95m9PYSEC-2026-3555
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 27, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-54653.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs53th percentile — riskier than 53% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.40%0.81%1.21%0.3%0.4%0.7%0.7%Aug 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-54653 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 396,257 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍datamodel-code-generator

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

datamodel-code-generator is vulnerable to code injection when generating Python models from an attacker-controlled JSON Schema, OpenAPI, YAML, JSON, Avro, Protobuf, or XSD schema. When a property carries a "default_factory" key, its value is interpolated verbatim — as a raw Python expression — into the generated Field(default_factory=...) / field(default_factory=...) call. Because this assignment is evaluated at class-definition time (i.e. on import of the generated module), an attacker who controls the schema controls a Python expression that runs in the consumer's process. No special CLI flags are required.

Details

The vulnerable chain spans the JSON-Schema-shaped parser and three sink locations (Pydantic v2, dataclass, msgspec):

Source — schema → extras:

  • src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py:600-614 — DEFAULT_FIELD_KEYS includes the literal string "default_factory".
  • src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py:457-459 — JsonSchemaObject.__init__ stores any non-standard key (including default_factory) in self.extras.
  • src/datamodel_code_generator/parser/jsonschema.py:797-812 — get_field_extras preserves default_factory through to the field model.

Sinks — extras → generated Python expression:

  1. src/datamodel_code_generator/model/pydantic_base.py:222-249:

    default_factory = data.pop("default_factory", None)
    ...
    if default_factory is not None:
        field_arguments = [f"default_factory={default_factory}", *field_arguments]
    

    The default_factory value is interpolated raw (no repr(), no validation).

  2. src/datamodel_code_generator/model/dataclass.py:211:

    f"{k}={v if k == 'default_factory' else repr(v)}"
    

    Explicit special-case to skip repr() for default_factory.

  3. src/datamodel_code_generator/model/msgspec.py:361 — same pattern as dataclass.

Because default_factory is in DEFAULT_FIELD_KEYS, no special CLI flag is needed to reach the sink. Any input format that uses the JSON-Schema-shaped parser (jsonschema, openapi, yaml, json, dict, csv) — and any input format that converts to it (avro, protobuf, xmlschema) — is in scope.

Confirmed PoC matrix

Input file typeOutput model typeResult
jsonschemapydantic_v2.BaseModelRCE on import
jsonschemadataclasses.dataclassRCE on import
jsonschemamsgspec.StructRCE on import
jsonschematyping.TypedDictsafe (TypedDict doesn't render field(); default_factory silently dropped)
openapipydantic_v2.BaseModelRCE on import

Other JSON-Schema-shaped inputs (yaml, json, dict, csv, avro, protobuf, xmlschema) follow the same code path and are expected to reproduce.

PoC

Self contained Proof of Concept is available at my secret gist: https://gist.github.com/thegr1ffyn/9648b0fe4fcf7d569ac8e61dd11eebaf

Impact

  • Who's affected: any developer or CI pipeline that runs datamodel-codegen against a schema they didn't author themselves — third-party API specs, schemas pulled from a registry, vendored upstream .json / .yaml / .avsc / .proto / .xsd files, schemas fetched from a remote URL or introspection endpoint — and who imports the generated .py.
  • What it gains: arbitrary Python code execution in the importer's process at import time. The PoC copies /etc/passwd to a tmp file to demonstrate arbitrary read; the same primitive supports any operation the importing process can perform (filesystem write, environment exfiltration, secondary network calls, RCE on CI runners).
  • What it does NOT need: no special CLI flags, no custom templates, no --extra-template-data, no --use-schema-description. Default invocation against a malicious schema is sufficient.
  • What does block it: choosing --output-model-type typing.TypedDict (which doesn't render field() / Field() calls). All other supported output model types are vulnerable.

Resolution

The fix validates schema-provided default_factory values while extracting JSON Schema field extras. Only the supported factory names dict, list, and set are accepted; any other value now raises a generator error before code generation. Generator-created default factories for supported mutable defaults and optional nested models continue to use the existing code paths.

Remediation

Upgrade to datamodel-code-generator 0.60.2 or later.

This issue affects datamodel-code-generator versions >= 0.17.0, <= 0.60.1 and is fixed in 0.60.2.

Submitted by: Hamza Haroon (thegr1ffyn)

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIdatamodel-code-generator≥ 0.17.0&&< 0.60.20.60.2pip install --upgrade 'datamodel-code-generator==0.60.2'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
datamodel-code-generatorkoxudaxi
≥ 0.17.0 && < 0.60.2
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for datamodel-code-generator, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update datamodel-code-generator to 0.60.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-54653 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Stop passing untrusted input into the interpreter or shell: call the affected binary with an argument array rather than a composed command string, reject anything outside a strict allowlist of expected values, and run the component under an account that cannot reach beyond the work it legitimately does.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `datamodel-code-generator` is vulnerable to code injection when generating Python models from an attacker-controlled JSON Schema, OpenAPI, YAML, JSON, Avro, Protobuf, or XSD schema. When a property carries a `"default_factory"` key, its value is interpolated verbatim — as a raw Python expression — into the generated `Field(default_factory=...)` / `field(default_factory=...)` call. Because this assignment is evaluated at class-definition time (i.e. on `import` of the generated module), an attacker who controls the schema controls a Python expression that runs in the consumer's proc
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-54653 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-54653: datamodel-code RCE — Fixed in 0.60.2