Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
Maven
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm undertow-core

HIGHFix: undertow-io/undertow@c7e84a0

GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in io.undertow:undertow-core. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for io.undertow:undertow-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Undertow vulnerable to memory exhaustion due to buffer leak

Also known asCVE-2021-3690
Published
Jul 15, 2022
Updated
Feb 16, 2024
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Sep 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
1.7%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs76th percentile — riskier than 76% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,238 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
io.undertow:undertow-coreio.undertow:undertow-core

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Buffer leak on incoming WebSocket PONG message(s) in Undertow before 2.0.40 and 2.2.10 can lead to memory exhaustion and allow a denial of service.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
Mavenio.undertow:undertow-coreall versions2.0.40io.undertow:undertow-core:2.0.40
Mavenio.undertow:undertow-core2.2.0&&< 2.2.102.2.10io.undertow:undertow-core:2.2.10
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for io.undertow:undertow-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update io.undertow:undertow-core to 2.0.40 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

Although Red Hat OpenStack Platform packages the vulnerable code in Opendaylight, it does not use or support the undertow-encapsulating features. The security impact for RHOSP is therefore rated as Low and no update will be provided at this time.

ProductFixed inAdvisory
EAP 7.3.9 releaseundertowRHSA-2021:3471
EAP 7.3 asyncsee advisoryRHSA-2021:3216
Red Hat EAP-XP 2.0.0 via EAP 7.3.x baseundertowRHSA-2021:3516
Red Hat Fuse 7.10undertowRHSA-2021:5134
Red Hat Integration Camel Quarkus 2see advisoryRHSA-2021:4767
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platformio.undertow/undertow-core:2.2.5.Final-redhat-00001RHSA-2021:3218
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platformio.undertow/undertow-core:2.2.9.SP1-redhat-00001RHSA-2021:3660
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7eap7-activemq-artemis-0:1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7RHSA-2025:4226

Frequently Asked Questions

Buffer leak on incoming WebSocket PONG message(s) in Undertow before 2.0.40 and 2.2.10 can lead to memory exhaustion and allow a denial of service.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm across Maven dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-fj7c-vg2v-ccrm: DoS (High 7.5) | O3 Security