Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
LOW severity

GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv

LOWFix: tensorflow/tensorflow@548b5ea

GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv is a low-severity (CVSS 2.5) CWE-369 vulnerability in tensorflow. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Division by 0 in `FractionalAvgPool`

Also known asBIT-tensorflow-2021-29550CVE-2021-29550PYSEC-2021-187PYSEC-2021-478PYSEC-2021-676
Published
May 21, 2021
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
12 pkgs
Patched
12 / 12
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Jul 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

12 pkgs affected
🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu+4 more

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

An attacker can cause a runtime division by zero error and denial of service in tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPool:

import tensorflow as tf

value = tf.constant([60], shape=[1, 1, 1, 1], dtype=tf.int32)
pooling_ratio = [1.0, 1.0000014345305555, 1.0, 1.0]
pseudo_random = False
overlapping = False
deterministic = False
seed = 0
seed2 = 0

tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPool(
  value=value, pooling_ratio=pooling_ratio, pseudo_random=pseudo_random,
  overlapping=overlapping, deterministic=deterministic, seed=seed, seed2=seed2)

This is because the implementation computes a divisor quantity by dividing two user controlled values:

for (int i = 0; i < tensor_in_and_out_dims; ++i) {
  output_size[i] = static_cast<int>(std::floor(input_size[i] / pooling_ratio_[i]));
  DCHECK_GT(output_size[i], 0); 
} 

The user controls the values of input_size[i] and pooling_ratio_[i] (via the value.shape() and pooling_ratio arguments). If the value in input_size[i] is smaller than the pooling_ratio_[i], then the floor operation results in output_size[i] being 0. The DCHECK_GT line is a no-op outside of debug mode, so in released versions of TF this does not trigger.

Later, these computed values are used as arguments to GeneratePoolingSequence. There, the first computation is a division in a modulo operation:

std::vector<int64> GeneratePoolingSequence(int input_length, int output_length,
                                           GuardedPhiloxRandom* generator,
                                           bool pseudo_random) {
  ...
  if (input_length % output_length == 0) {
    diff = std::vector<int64>(output_length, input_length / output_length);
  }
  ...
}

Since output_length can be 0, this results in runtime crashing.

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 548b5eaf23685d86f722233d8fbc21d0a4aecb96.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by Ying Wang and Yakun Zhang of Baidu X-Team.

Affected Packages

12 total 12 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPItensorflowall versions2.1.4
🐍PyPItensorflow2.2.0&&< 2.2.32.2.3
🐍PyPItensorflow2.3.0&&< 2.3.32.3.3
🐍PyPItensorflow2.4.0&&< 2.4.22.4.2
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpuall versions2.1.4
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpu2.2.0&&< 2.2.32.2.3
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update tensorflow to 2.1.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact An attacker can cause a runtime division by zero error and denial of service in `tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPool`: ```python import tensorflow as tf value = tf.constant([60], shape=[1, 1, 1, 1], dtype=tf.int32) pooling_ratio = [1.0, 1.0000014345305555, 1.0, 1.0] pseudo_random = False overlapping = False deterministic = False seed = 0 seed2 = 0 tf.raw_ops.FractionalAvgPool( value=value, pooling_ratio=pooling_ratio, pseudo_random=pseudo_random, overlapping=overlapping, deterministic=deterministic, seed=seed, seed2=seed2) ``` This is because the [implementation](https://github.com
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-f78g-q7r4-9wcv: Division by 0 in… | O3 Security