Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-cxgv-px37-4mp2

HIGH

Nuxt Icon affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Also known asCVE-2024-42352
Published
Aug 5, 2024
Updated
Aug 6, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk46th percentile+0.56%
0.00%0.38%0.77%1.15%0.1%0.6%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
📦@nuxt/icon

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects npm packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

nuxt/icon provides an API to allow client side icon lookup. This endpoint is at /api/_nuxt_icon/[name].

The proxied request path is improperly parsed, allowing an attacker to change the scheme and host of the request. This leads to SSRF, and could potentially lead to sensitive data exposure.

Details

The new URL constructor is used to parse the final path. This constructor can be passed a relative scheme or path in order to change the host the request is sent to. This constructor is also very tolerant of poorly formatted URLs.

As a result we can pass a path prefixed with the string http:. This has the effect of changing the scheme to HTTP. We can then subsequently pass a new host, for example http:127.0.0.1:8080. This would allow us to send requests to a local server.

PoC

Make a request to /api/_nuxt_icon/http:example.com, observe the data returned has been fetched from a different resource than intended.

I typically try to find an example within Nuxt infrastructure that is vulnerable to these types of bugs, but I could not identify any with this endpoint enabled.

Impact

  • SSRF, potential sensitive data exposure.
  • I do not believe this can be chained into an XSS, but it may be possible.
  • Does not have a security impact on services deployed on Cloudflare Workers.
  • Does not impact certain builds and modes (like static builds).
  • Can be mitigated using by disabling the fallbackToApi option.

Fix

  • Ensure the host has not been changed after the path is parsed.
  • Alternatively, prefix the path with ./.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@nuxt/iconall versions1.4.5

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @nuxt/icon. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update @nuxt/icon to 1.4.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cxgv-px37-4mp2 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-cxgv-px37-4mp2 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-cxgv-px37-4mp2. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary `nuxt/icon` provides an API to allow client side icon lookup. This endpoint is at `/api/_nuxt_icon/[name]`. The proxied request path is improperly parsed, allowing an attacker to change the scheme and host of the request. This leads to SSRF, and could potentially lead to sensitive data exposure. ### Details The `new URL` constructor is used to parse the final path. This constructor can be passed a relative scheme or path in order to change the host the request is sent to. This constructor is also very tolerant of poorly formatted URLs. As a result we can pass a path prefixed wit
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-cxgv-px37-4mp2 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-cxgv-px37-4mp2 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.