MantisBT XSS in manage_custom_field_update.phpGHSA-cvrm-cr3m-qj92
MEDIUMFix: mantisbt/mantisbt@100c3d5GHSA-cvrm-cr3m-qj92 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in mantisbt/mantisbt. A fix is available for mantisbt/mantisbt — see the affected versions and patch details below.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
mantisbt/mantisbtReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
An issue was discovered in MantisBT through 2.24.3. In the helper_ensure_confirmed call in manage_custom_field_update.php, the custom field name is not sanitized. This may be problematic depending on CSP settings.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | mantisbt/mantisbt | all versions | 2.25.0composer require mantisbt/mantisbt:^2.25.0 |
Affected Products
mantisbtmantisbtDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mantisbt/mantisbt, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update mantisbt/mantisbt to 2.25.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cvrm-cr3m-qj92 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-cvrm-cr3m-qj92 in your dependencies?
Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.