Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-cqvq-fvhr-v6hc

`CHECK` failure in `SobolSample` via missing validation

Published
Nov 21, 2022
Updated
Dec 4, 2024
Affected
9 pkgs
Patched
9 / 9
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

9 pkgs affected
🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-gpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-gpu🐍tensorflow-cpu+1 more

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Another instance of CVE-2022-35935, where SobolSample is vulnerable to a denial of service via assumed scalar inputs, was found and fixed.

import tensorflow as tf
tf.raw_ops.SobolSample(dim=tf.constant([1,0]), num_results=tf.constant([1]), skip=tf.constant([1]))

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commits c65c67f88ad770662e8f191269a907bf2b94b1bf and 02400ea266bd811fc016a848445de1bbff3a23a0

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.11. We will also cherrypick both commits on TensorFlow 2.10.1, 2.9.3, and TensorFlow 2.8.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range. TensorFlow 2.7.4 will have the first commit cherrypicked.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by:

  • Kang Hong Jin from Singapore Management University
  • Neophytos Christou, Secure Systems Labs, Brown University
  • 刘力源, Information System & Security and Countermeasures Experiments Center, Beijing Institute of Technology
  • Pattarakrit Rattankul

Affected Packages

9 total 9 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPItensorflowall versions2.8.4
🐍PyPItensorflow2.9.0&&< 2.9.32.9.3
🐍PyPItensorflow2.10.0&&< 2.10.12.10.1
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpuall versions2.8.4
🐍PyPItensorflow-gpuall versions2.8.4
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpu2.9.0&&< 2.9.32.9.3

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update tensorflow to 2.8.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cqvq-fvhr-v6hc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-cqvq-fvhr-v6hc is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-cqvq-fvhr-v6hc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Another instance of CVE-2022-35935, where `SobolSample` is vulnerable to a denial of service via assumed scalar inputs, was found and fixed. ```python import tensorflow as tf tf.raw_ops.SobolSample(dim=tf.constant([1,0]), num_results=tf.constant([1]), skip=tf.constant([1])) ``` ### Patches We have patched the issue in GitHub commits [c65c67f88ad770662e8f191269a907bf2b94b1bf](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/c65c67f88ad770662e8f191269a907bf2b94b1bf) and [02400ea266bd811fc016a848445de1bbff3a23a0](https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/commit/02400ea266bd811fc016a8484
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-cqvq-fvhr-v6hc in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-cqvq-fvhr-v6hc across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.