GHSA-cjw8-79x6-5cj4 — jspdf
Fix: parallax/jsPDF@2863e5cGHSA-cjw8-79x6-5cj4 is a CWE-362 vulnerability in jspdf. A fix is available for jspdf — see the affected versions and patch details below.
jsPDF has Shared State Race Condition in addJS Plugin
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-cjw8-79x6-5cj4.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
jspdfnpmDescription
Impact
The addJS method in the jspdf Node.js build utilizes a shared module-scoped variable (text) to store JavaScript content. When used in a concurrent environment (e.g., a Node.js web server), this variable is shared across all requests.
If multiple requests generate PDFs simultaneously, the JavaScript content intended for one user may be overwritten by a subsequent request before the document is generated. This results in Cross-User Data Leakage, where the PDF generated for User A contains the JavaScript payload (and any embedded sensitive data) intended for User B.
Typically, this only affects server-side environments, although the same race conditions might occur if jsPDF runs client-side.
import { jsPDF } from "jspdf";
const docA = new jsPDF();
const docB = new jsPDF();
// 1. User A sets their script (stored in shared 'text' variable)
docA.addJS('console.log("Secret A");');
// 2. User B sets their script (overwrites shared 'text' variable)
docB.addJS('console.log("Secret B");');
// 3. User A saves their PDF (reads current 'text' variable)
docA.save("userA.pdf");
// Result: userA.pdf contains "Secret B" instead of "Secret A"
Patches
The vulnerability has been fixed in [email protected]. The fix moves the shared variable into the function scope, ensuring isolation between instances.
Workarounds
Avoid using the addJS method in concurrent server-side environments. If usage is required, ensure requests are processed sequentially (e.g., using a queue) rather than in parallel.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | jspdf | all versions | 4.1.0npm install jspdf@4.1.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for jspdf, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update jspdf to 4.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-cjw8-79x6-5cj4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-cjw8-79x6-5cj4 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-cjw8-79x6-5cj4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This MODERATE impact vulnerability in jsPDF affects applications utilizing the `addJS` method in a concurrent server-side Node.js environment. A shared module-scoped variable can lead to cross-user data leakage when multiple PDF generation requests occur simultaneously, potentially embedding sensitive data from one…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.8 | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:1773235880 | RHSA-2026:4466 |
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security 4.9 | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:1773235860 | RHSA-2026:4467 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-cjw8-79x6-5cj4 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-cjw8-79x6-5cj4 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.