Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-ch7q-53v8-73pc

MEDIUM

authentik's invitation expiry is delayed by at least 5 minutes

Also known asBIT-authentik-2025-64708CVE-2025-64708GO-2025-4136
Published
Nov 19, 2025
Updated
Apr 17, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk12th percentile+0.17%
0.00%0.24%0.48%0.72%0.0%0.2%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹goauthentik.io

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

In previous authentik versions, invitations were considered valid regardless if they are expired or not, thus relying on background tasks to clean up expired ones. In a normal scenario this can take up to 5 minutes because the cleanup of expired objects is scheduled to run every 5 minutes. However, with a large amount of tasks in the backlog, this might take longer.

Patches

authentik 2025.8.5 and 2025.10.2 fix this issue; for other versions the workaround below can be used.

Workarounds

Users can create a policy that explicitly checks whether the invitation is still valid, and then bind it to the invitation stage on your invitation flow, and deny access if the invitation is not valid.

return not context['flow_plan'].context['invitation'].is_expired

For more information

If users have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogoauthentik.ioall versions0.0.0-20251119135424-6672e6aaa41e

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for goauthentik.io. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update goauthentik.io to 0.0.0-20251119135424-6672e6aaa41e or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-ch7q-53v8-73pc is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-ch7q-53v8-73pc is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-ch7q-53v8-73pc. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary In previous authentik versions, invitations were considered valid regardless if they are expired or not, thus relying on background tasks to clean up expired ones. In a normal scenario this can take up to 5 minutes because the cleanup of expired objects is scheduled to run every 5 minutes. However, with a large amount of tasks in the backlog, this might take longer. ### Patches authentik 2025.8.5 and 2025.10.2 fix this issue; for other versions the workaround below can be used. ### Workarounds Users can create a policy that explicitly checks whether the invitation is still val
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-ch7q-53v8-73pc in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-ch7q-53v8-73pc across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.