Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3

MEDIUM

GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) vulnerability in zebra-rpc. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

zebrad vulnerable to full node denial of service via crafted Sapling receiver in z_listunifiedreceivers

Published
Jul 2, 2026
Updated
Jul 2, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Jul 2, 2026 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🦀zebra-rpc🦀zebrad

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Am I affected

You are affected if:

  1. You run zebrad up to and including v4.4.1.
  2. Your zebrad.toml sets rpc.listen_addr to a TCP address (RPC server is enabled).
  3. An attacker can authenticate to the RPC endpoint. With the default enable_cookie_auth = true, this requires the attacker to read the .cookie file (typically local access). With enable_cookie_auth = false, any network client reaching the RPC port can trigger it.

Summary

The z_listunifiedreceivers RPC handler panics when processing a structurally valid Unified Address whose Sapling receiver carries 43 bytes that fail cryptographic validation (sapling_crypto::PaymentAddress::from_bytes returns None for non-subgroup Jubjub points). The handler calls .expect("using data already decoded as valid") on the fallible result. Because Zebra's release profile sets panic = "abort", the panic terminates the entire node process, not just the RPC task.

Details

zcash_address::unified::Encoding::decode validates only the structural envelope of a Unified Address (F4Jumble, bech32m, typecode ordering, 43-byte length for Sapling). It does not validate that the embedded pk_d is a valid Jubjub subgroup point or that the diversifier produces a valid g_d preimage.

At zebra-rpc/src/methods.rs:2893, the handler calls Address::try_from_sapling(network, data), which delegates to sapling_crypto::PaymentAddress::from_bytes. When from_bytes returns None (most random 32-byte strings fail the subgroup check), the .expect() fires and the process aborts.

The same crate already handles this correctly in try_from_unified at zebra-chain/src/primitives/address.rs:99-110, which returns Err when from_bytes fails. The vulnerable code path bypasses this validated route.

Patches

zebra-rpc 8.0.0 and zebrad 4.5.0.

Replace .expect() with .map_err(|e| ErrorObject::owned(...)) for proper error propagation, or route through the existing try_from_unified path which already handles this case correctly.

Workarounds

  • Disable the RPC server by removing rpc.listen_addr from zebrad.toml.
  • Ensure enable_cookie_auth = true (the default) and restrict filesystem access to the .cookie file.
  • Place a reverse proxy in front of the RPC port that rejects z_listunifiedreceivers calls with untrusted address parameters.

Impact

A single authenticated RPC request terminates the zebrad process. The attack is repeatable on restart (the same request triggers the same abort), allowing an attacker to keep the node down indefinitely until the request is filtered upstream. Operators using lightwalletd backends, Zaino indexers, or mining pool infrastructure that forward RPC calls to zebrad may be exposed if the forwarding path passes through z_listunifiedreceivers.

Credit

Reported by @robustfengbin via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iozebra-rpcall versions8.0.0
🦀crates.iozebradall versions4.5.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for zebra-rpc. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update zebra-rpc to 8.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Am I affected You are affected if: 1. You run `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`. 2. Your `zebrad.toml` sets `rpc.listen_addr` to a TCP address (RPC server is enabled). 3. An attacker can authenticate to the RPC endpoint. With the default `enable_cookie_auth = true`, this requires the attacker to read the `.cookie` file (typically local access). With `enable_cookie_auth = false`, any network client reaching the RPC port can trigger it. ### Summary The `z_listunifiedreceivers` RPC handler panics when processing a structurally valid Unified Address whose Sapling receiver carries 43 by
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3 across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-c8w6-x74f-vmg3: zebra-rpc (Medium 6.5) | O3 Security