CVE-2026-104434 — zebra-rpc
CVE-2026-104434 is a Reachable Assertion vulnerability in zebra-rpc. A fix is available for zebra-rpc — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Zebra before 8.0.0 Denial of Service via z_listunifiedreceivers RPC
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-104434.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
zebra-rpc🦀zebradReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Am I affected
You are affected if:
- You run
zebradup to and includingv4.4.1. - Your
zebrad.tomlsetsrpc.listen_addrto a TCP address (RPC server is enabled). - An attacker can authenticate to the RPC endpoint. With the default
enable_cookie_auth = true, this requires the attacker to read the.cookiefile (typically local access). Withenable_cookie_auth = false, any network client reaching the RPC port can trigger it.
Summary
The z_listunifiedreceivers RPC handler panics when processing a structurally valid Unified Address whose Sapling receiver carries 43 bytes that fail cryptographic validation (sapling_crypto::PaymentAddress::from_bytes returns None for non-subgroup Jubjub points). The handler calls .expect("using data already decoded as valid") on the fallible result. Because Zebra's release profile sets panic = "abort", the panic terminates the entire node process, not just the RPC task.
Details
zcash_address::unified::Encoding::decode validates only the structural envelope of a Unified Address (F4Jumble, bech32m, typecode ordering, 43-byte length for Sapling). It does not validate that the embedded pk_d is a valid Jubjub subgroup point or that the diversifier produces a valid g_d preimage.
At zebra-rpc/src/methods.rs:2893, the handler calls Address::try_from_sapling(network, data), which delegates to sapling_crypto::PaymentAddress::from_bytes. When from_bytes returns None (most random 32-byte strings fail the subgroup check), the .expect() fires and the process aborts.
The same crate already handles this correctly in try_from_unified at zebra-chain/src/primitives/address.rs:99-110, which returns Err when from_bytes fails. The vulnerable code path bypasses this validated route.
Patches
zebra-rpc 8.0.0 and zebrad 4.5.0.
Replace .expect() with .map_err(|e| ErrorObject::owned(...)) for proper error propagation, or route through the existing try_from_unified path which already handles this case correctly.
Workarounds
- Disable the RPC server by removing
rpc.listen_addrfromzebrad.toml. - Ensure
enable_cookie_auth = true(the default) and restrict filesystem access to the.cookiefile. - Place a reverse proxy in front of the RPC port that rejects
z_listunifiedreceiverscalls with untrusted address parameters.
Impact
A single authenticated RPC request terminates the zebrad process. The attack is repeatable on restart (the same request triggers the same abort), allowing an attacker to keep the node down indefinitely until the request is filtered upstream. Operators using lightwalletd backends, Zaino indexers, or mining pool infrastructure that forward RPC calls to zebrad may be exposed if the forwarding path passes through z_listunifiedreceivers.
Credit
Reported by @robustfengbin via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | zebra-rpc | all versions | 8.0.0cargo update -p zebra-rpc --precise 8.0.0 |
| 🦀crates.io | zebrad | all versions | 4.5.0cargo update -p zebrad --precise 4.5.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for zebra-rpc, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update zebra-rpc to 8.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-104434 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-104434 in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.